Literature DB >> 35986801

Adjuvant enzalutamide for the treatment of early-stage androgen-receptor positive, triple-negative breast cancer: a feasibility study.

Elaine M Walsh1, Ayca Gucalp2, Sujata Patil3, Marcia Edelweiss4, Dara S Ross4, Pedram Razavi2, Shanu Modi2, Neil M Iyengar2, Rachel Sanford2, Tiffany Troso-Sandoval2, Mila Gorsky2, Jacqueline Bromberg2, Pamela Drullinsky2, Diana Lake2, Serena Wong2, Patricia Ann DeFusco5, Nicholas Lamparella6, Ranja Gupta6, Tasmila Tabassum2, Leigh Ann Boyle2, Artavazd Arumov2, Tiffany A Traina2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). A subset of TNBCs express the androgen receptor (AR), representing a potential new therapeutic target. This study assessed the feasibility of adjuvant enzalutamide, an AR antagonist, in early-stage, AR-positive (AR +) TNBC.
METHODS: This study was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter trial in which patients with stage I-III, AR ≥ 1% TNBC who had completed standard-of-care therapy were treated with enzalutamide 160 mg/day orally for 1 year. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of 1 year of adjuvant enzalutamide, defined as the treatment discontinuation rate of enzalutamide due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or other events related to tolerability. Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and genomic features of recurrent tumors.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled in this study. Thirty-five patients completed 1 year of therapy, thereby meeting the prespecified trial endpoint for feasibility. Thirty-two patients elected to continue with an optional second year of treatment. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were uncommon. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year DFS were 94%, 92% , and 80%, respectively. Median OS has not been reached.
CONCLUSION: This clinical trial demonstrates that adjuvant enzalutamide is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen in patients with an early-stage AR + TNBC. Randomized trials in the metastatic setting may inform patient selection through biomarker development; longer follow-up is needed to determine the effect of anti-androgens on DFS and OS in this patient population.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgen-dependent breast cancer; Androgen-receptor positive; Anti-androgen therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35986801     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06669-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.624


  42 in total

Review 1.  Clinical implications of molecular heterogeneity in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Brian D Lehmann; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence.

Authors:  Rebecca Dent; Maureen Trudeau; Kathleen I Pritchard; Wedad M Hanna; Harriet K Kahn; Carol A Sawka; Lavina A Lickley; Ellen Rawlinson; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Efficacy and Safety of Ixabepilone and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Triple-negative Breast Cancer: a Pooled Analysis From Two Large Phase III, Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Hope S Rugo; Henri Roche; Eva Thomas; Hyun C Chung; Guillermo L Lerzo; Igor Vasyutin; Amit Patel; Linda Vahdat
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Molecular Heterogeneity of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Vandana G Abramson; Ingrid A Mayer
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2014-09-01

Review 5.  Androgen Receptor Biology in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: a Case for Classification as AR+ or Quadruple Negative Disease.

Authors:  Valerie N Barton; Nicholas C D'Amato; Michael A Gordon; Jessica L Christenson; Anthony Elias; Jennifer K Richer
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.869

6.  Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer after Preoperative Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Norikazu Masuda; Soo-Jung Lee; Shoichiro Ohtani; Young-Hyuck Im; Eun-Sook Lee; Isao Yokota; Katsumasa Kuroi; Seock-Ah Im; Byeong-Woo Park; Sung-Bae Kim; Yasuhiro Yanagita; Shinji Ohno; Shintaro Takao; Kenjiro Aogi; Hiroji Iwata; Joon Jeong; Aeree Kim; Kyong-Hwa Park; Hironobu Sasano; Yasuo Ohashi; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype.

Authors:  Maggie C U Cheang; David Voduc; Chris Bajdik; Samuel Leung; Steven McKinney; Stephen K Chia; Charles M Perou; Torsten O Nielsen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among 7 triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes.

Authors:  Hiroko Masuda; Keith A Baggerly; Ying Wang; Ya Zhang; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Vicente Valero; Brian D Lehmann; Jennifer A Pietenpol; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; W Fraser Symmans; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia Liedtke; Chafika Mazouni; Kenneth R Hess; Fabrice André; Attila Tordai; Jaime A Mejia; W Fraser Symmans; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Massimo Cristofanilli; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Phase III open-label randomized study of eribulin mesylate versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane.

Authors:  Peter A Kaufman; Ahmad Awada; Chris Twelves; Louise Yelle; Edith A Perez; Galina Velikova; Martin S Olivo; Yi He; Corina E Dutcus; Javier Cortes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.