Josef Stehlik1, Maria Mountis2, Donald Haas3, Maryse Palardy4, Amrut V Ambardekar5, Jerry D Estep2, Gregory Ewald6, Stuart D Russell7, Shawn Robinson8, Ulrich Jorde9, Wendy C Taddei-Peters10, Neal Jeffries10, Blair Richards11, Shokoufeh Khalatbari11, Catherine Spino12, J Timothy Baldwin10, Douglas Mann6, Garrick C Stewart13, Keith D Aaronson4. 1. University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah. Electronic address: josef.stehlik@hsc.utah.edu. 2. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio. 3. Abington - Jefferson Health, Abington, Pennsylvania. 4. University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado. 6. Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. 7. Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. 8. University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland. 9. Montefiore Medical Center, New York City, New York. 10. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. 11. University of Michigan, Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 12. University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 13. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Registry Evaluation of Vital Information for Ventricular Assist Devices (VADs) in Ambulatory Life study is a prospective multicenter cohort of 400 ambulatory patients with advanced chronic systolic heart failure (HF). The aim of the study is to better understand disease trajectory and optimal timing of advanced HF therapies. We examined patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data collected at enrollment and their association with patient treatment preferences for VAD placement. METHODS: Baseline assessment of HRQOL included the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), along with patient self-assessment of remaining life (PSARL). Descriptive statistics were used to present baseline HRQOL data and Spearman correlation tests to assess the association between KCCQ, VAS, and VAD treatment preference with patient clinical characteristics of interest. RESULTS: The median age was 60 years, 75% were male, and the median left ventricular ejection fraction was 20%. The median (25th percentile, 75th percentile), baseline KCCQ summary score was 64 (48, 78), VAS score 65 (50, 75), and PSARL 7 years (5, 10). There were statistically significant associations of baseline KCCQ and VAS with New York Heart Association class and Interagency Registry of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile (p < 0.005 for all comparisons). Baseline KCCQ and VAS revealed a modest association with PSARL (correlation = 0.45 and 0.35, respectively; p < 0.001), and many patients were overly optimistic about their expected survival. VAD treatment preference was associated with KCCQ scores (p < 0.031), but the absolute differences were small. VAD treatment preference was independent of other key clinical characteristics such as subject age, VAS, and PSARL. CONCLUSIONS: We found a lack of strong association between HRQOL and patient preference for VAD therapy. Better understanding of patients' perceptions of their illness and how this relates to HRQOL outcomes, clinician risk assessment, and patient decision-making is needed. This may in turn allow better guidance toward available HF therapies in this vulnerable population. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: The Registry Evaluation of Vital Information for Ventricular Assist Devices (VADs) in Ambulatory Life study is a prospective multicenter cohort of 400 ambulatory patients with advanced chronic systolic heart failure (HF). The aim of the study is to better understand disease trajectory and optimal timing of advanced HF therapies. We examined patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data collected at enrollment and their association with patient treatment preferences for VAD placement. METHODS: Baseline assessment of HRQOL included the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), along with patient self-assessment of remaining life (PSARL). Descriptive statistics were used to present baseline HRQOL data and Spearman correlation tests to assess the association between KCCQ, VAS, and VAD treatment preference with patient clinical characteristics of interest. RESULTS: The median age was 60 years, 75% were male, and the median left ventricular ejection fraction was 20%. The median (25th percentile, 75th percentile), baseline KCCQ summary score was 64 (48, 78), VAS score 65 (50, 75), and PSARL 7 years (5, 10). There were statistically significant associations of baseline KCCQ and VAS with New York Heart Association class and Interagency Registry of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile (p < 0.005 for all comparisons). Baseline KCCQ and VAS revealed a modest association with PSARL (correlation = 0.45 and 0.35, respectively; p < 0.001), and many patients were overly optimistic about their expected survival. VAD treatment preference was associated with KCCQ scores (p < 0.031), but the absolute differences were small. VAD treatment preference was independent of other key clinical characteristics such as subject age, VAS, and PSARL. CONCLUSIONS: We found a lack of strong association between HRQOL and patient preference for VAD therapy. Better understanding of patients' perceptions of their illness and how this relates to HRQOL outcomes, clinician risk assessment, and patient decision-making is needed. This may in turn allow better guidance toward available HF therapies in this vulnerable population. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Soon J Park; Carmelo A Milano; Antone J Tatooles; Joseph G Rogers; Robert M Adamson; D Eric Steidley; Gregory A Ewald; Kartik S Sundareswaran; David J Farrar; Mark S Slaughter Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Keith D Aaronson; Mark S Slaughter; Leslie W Miller; Edwin C McGee; William G Cotts; Michael A Acker; Mariell L Jessup; Igor D Gregoric; Pranav Loyalka; O H Frazier; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Allen S Anderson; Robert L Kormos; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Wayne C Levy; David C Naftel; Richard M Bittman; Francis D Pagani; David R Hathaway; Steven W Boyce Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Josef Stehlik; Jerry D Estep; Craig H Selzman; Joseph G Rogers; John A Spertus; Keyur B Shah; Joyce Chuang; David J Farrar; Randall C Starling Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: John Spertus; Eric Peterson; Mark W Conard; Paul A Heidenreich; Harlan M Krumholz; Philip Jones; Peter A McCullough; Ileana Pina; Joseph Tooley; William S Weintraub; John S Rumsfeld Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jerry D Estep; Randall C Starling; Douglas A Horstmanshof; Carmelo A Milano; Craig H Selzman; Keyur B Shah; Matthias Loebe; Nader Moazami; James W Long; Josef Stehlik; Vigneshwar Kasirajan; Donald C Haas; John B O'Connell; Andrew J Boyle; David J Farrar; Joseph G Rogers Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Amrut V Ambardekar; Jennifer T Thibodeau; Adam D DeVore; Michelle M Kittleson; Rhondalyn C Forde-McLean; Maryse Palardy; Maria M Mountis; Linda Cadaret; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Salpy V Pamboukian; Rongbing Xie; Lynne W Stevenson; Garrick C Stewart Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Kathleen L Grady; David C Naftel; Susan Myers; Annetine Gelijins; Alan Moskowitz; Francis D Pagani; James B Young; John A Spertus; James K Kirklin Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Lynne Warner Stevenson; Francis D Pagani; James B Young; Mariell Jessup; Leslie Miller; Robert L Kormos; David C Naftel; Karen Ulisney; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; James K Kirklin Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Windy W Alonso; Kenneth M Faulkner; Bunny J Pozehl; Judith E Hupcey; Lisa A Kitko; Christopher S Lee Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Kathleen L Grady; Adin-Cristian Andrei; Christian Elenbaas; Anna Warzecha; Abigail Baldridge; Andrew Kao; John A Spertus; Duc-Thinh Pham; Mary Amanda Dew; Eileen Hsich; William Cotts; Justin Hartupee; Salpy V Pamboukian; Francis D Pagani; Michael Petty; Brent Lampert; Maryl Johnson; Margaret Murray; Koji Takeda; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Scott Silvestry; James K Kirklin; Clyde Yancy Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-02-12 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Dragana Kosevic; Dominik Wiedemann; Petar Vukovic; Velibor Ristic; Julia Riebandt; Una Radak; Kersten Brandes; Peter Goettel; Hans-Dirk Duengen; Elvis Tahirovic; Tatjana Kottmann; Hans Werner Voss; Marija Zdravkovic; Svetozar Putnik; Jan D Schmitto; Johannes Mueller; Jesus Eduardo Rame; Miodrag Peric Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2021-02-09