Literature DB >> 31821552

Communication during childhood cancer: Systematic review of patient perspectives.

Beryl Lin1,2, Talia Gutman1,3, Camilla S Hanson1,3, Angela Ju1,3, Karine Manera1,3, Phyllis Butow4, Richard J Cohn2,5, Luciano Dalla-Pozza6, Katie A Greenzang7, Jennifer Mack7, Claire E Wakefield2,5, Jonathan C Craig1,3, Allison Tong1,3.   

Abstract

Effective communication is challenging in childhood cancer, where decisions carry unpredictable and life-threatening implications. We aimed to describe patients' experiences of communicating with clinicians during treatment of childhood cancer. A systematic review of qualitative studies to April 2019 was performed. Eligible studies included patients diagnosed with cancer at age ≤ 18 years and reported their perspectives of communicating with clinicians during treatment of childhood cancer. Data were extracted from primary studies for thematic synthesis. From 101 articles across 25 countries involving 1870 participants who were diagnosed with cancer between ages 3 to 18 years, we identified 6 themes: 1) rendered invisible and powerless (displaced and undermined by adult authority; betrayed and distrustful; feeling neglected; helpless and intimidated; disempowered by lack of information); 2) fear and worry for the future (paralyzed by devastating news; uncertainty, anticipation, and dread; broaching intimate and private topics); 3) burdened with responsibility (pressured and unprepared; balancing external expectations; protecting hope); 4) therapeutic patient-provider relationships (emotional support and encouragement; validated personhood and companionship); 5) safety in trust (truthfulness and transparency; prepared by awareness and understanding; reassured by reliable expertise; depending on adults for protection and difficult decisions; security in expressing opinions and needs); and 6) empowerment and assertive agency (right to individual knowledge and choice; control over own life; partnership and respect; enhancing capacity for self-management). During treatment of childhood cancer, patients gain a sense of respect, safety, and control when they feel clinicians address their information and developmental needs. However, communication that is perceived to be parent-centered can be disempowering. Promoting child agency and partnership may improve care and outcomes for children with cancer.
© 2019 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescent; cancer; child; communication; decision making; patient; qualitative

Year:  2019        PMID: 31821552     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  11 in total

1.  Information needs of children with leukemia and their parents' perspectives of their information needs: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Noyuri Yamaji; Yasuko Nagamatsu; Kyoko Kobayashi; Daisuke Hasegawa; Yuki Yuza; Erika Ota
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 2.567

2.  Helping Children to Participate in Human Papillomavirus-Related Discussions: Mixed Methods Study of Multimedia Messages.

Authors:  Aurora Occa; Hayley M Stahl; Sarah Julien-Bell
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-11

3.  "Some things are even worse than telling a child he is going to die": Pediatric oncology healthcare professionals perspectives on communicating with children about cancer and end of life.

Authors:  Anat Laronne; Leeat Granek; Lori Wiener; Paula Feder-Bubis; Hana Golan
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 3.838

4.  The Development of an mHealth Tool for Children With Long-term Illness to Enable Person-Centered Communication: User-Centered Design Approach.

Authors:  Angelica Wiljén; John Eric Chaplin; Vanessa Crine; William Jobe; Ensa Johnson; Katarina Karlsson; Tomas Lindroth; Anneli Schwarz; Margaretha Stenmarker; Gunilla Thunberg; Joakim Öhlén; Stefan Nilsson
Journal:  JMIR Pediatr Parent       Date:  2022-03-08

5.  The Perceptions of Children and Adolescents with Cancer Regarding Nurses' Communication Behaviors during Needle Procedures.

Authors:  Encarna Gómez-Gamboa; Olga Rodrigo-Pedrosa; Marta San-Millán; Maria Angeles Saz-Roy; Anna Negre-Loscertales; Montserrat Puig-Llobet
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Mitigating negative emotions through virtual reality and embodiment.

Authors:  Maria Sansoni; Giovanni Scarzello; Silvia Serino; Elena Groff; Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.473

7.  Adolescent and Young Adult Initiated Discussions of Advance Care Planning: Family Member, Friend and Health Care Provider Perspectives.

Authors:  Sima Z Bedoya; Abigail Fry; Mallorie L Gordon; Maureen E Lyon; Jessica Thompkins; Karen Fasciano; Paige Malinowski; Corey Heath; Leonard Sender; Keri Zabokrtsky; Maryland Pao; Lori Wiener
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-08

8.  Information-sharing experiences of professionals looking after children with cancer: a qualitative exploration from a specialist paediatric oncology unit in India.

Authors:  Trishna Chaudhuri; Devi Nandakumar; Soumitra Shankar Datta; Zakir Husain; Reghu K Sukumaran; Inder Sekhar Yadav; Sekhar Krishnan; Samiran Panda
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2022-05-26

9.  Transcultural adaptation of the children's anxiety questionnaire in Brazil.

Authors:  Josiane Ramos Garcia Rodrigues; Marla Andréia Garcia de Avila; Milena Temer Jamas; Fernanda Paula Cerantôla Siqueira; Loiane Garcia Daniel; Stefan Nilsson
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-02-21

Review 10.  Efficient Clinical Counseling for Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Kerry A Morrone; Deepa Manwani; Michael D Cabana
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.