Literature DB >> 31821436

Primary Care Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Janelle M Guirguis-Blake1,2, Tracy L Beil2, Caitlyn A Senger2, Erin L Coppola2.   

Abstract

Importance: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have mortality estimated at 81%. Objective: To systematically review the evidence on benefits and harms of AAA screening and small aneurysm treatment to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PubMed (publisher supplied only), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant English-language studies published through September 2018. Surveillance continued through July 2019. Study Selection: Trials of AAA screening benefits and harms; trials and cohort studies of small (3.0-5.4 cm) AAA treatment benefits and harms. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles and extracted data. The Peto method was used to pool odds ratios (ORs) for AAA-related mortality, rupture, and operations; the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to pool calculated risk ratios for all-cause mortality. Main Outcomes and Measures: AAA and all-cause mortality; AAA rupture; treatment complications.
Results: Fifty studies (N = 323 279) met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of population-based randomized clinical trials (RCTs) estimated that a screening invitation to men 65 years or older was associated with a reduction in AAA-related mortality over 12 to 15 years (OR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.57-0.74]; 4 RCTs [n = 124 926]), AAA-related ruptures over 12 to 15 years (OR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.55-0.70]; 4 RCTs [n = 124 929]), and emergency surgical procedures over 4 to 15 years (OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.48-0.68]; 5 RCTS [n = 175 085]). In contrast, no significant association with all-cause mortality benefit was seen at 12- to 15-year follow-up (relative risk, 0.99 [95% CI 0.98-1.00]; 4 RCTs [n = 124 929]). One-time screening was associated with significantly more procedures over 4 to 15 years in the invited group compared with the control group (OR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.34-1.55]; 5 RCTs [n = 175 085]). Four trials (n = 3314) of small aneurysm surgical treatment demonstrated no significant difference in AAA-related mortality or all-cause mortality compared with surveillance over 1.7 to 12 years. These 4 early surgery trials showed a substantial increase in procedures in the early surgery group. For small aneurysm treatment, registry data (3 studies [n = 14 424]) showed that women had higher surgical complications and postoperative mortality compared with men. Conclusions and Relevance: One-time AAA screening in men 65 years or older was associated with decreased AAA-related mortality and rupture rates but was not associated with all-cause mortality benefit. Higher rates of elective surgery but no long-term differences in quality of life resulted from screening.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31821436     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.17021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  26 in total

1.  Risk prediction for abdominal aortic aneurysm: One size does not necessarily fit all.

Authors:  Jan Sokol; Patricia K Nguyen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  RUNX3 is up-regulated in abdominal aortic aneurysm and regulates the function of vascular smooth muscle cells by regulating TGF-β1.

Authors:  Zhongxiao Zhou; Haimeng Zhou; Xin Zou; Xiaowei Wang
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.156

3.  Cost-effectiveness of a population-based AAA screening program for men over 65 years old in Iran.

Authors:  Rajabali Daroudi; Omid Shafe; Jamal Moosavi; Javad Salimi; Yahya Bayazidi; Mohammad Reza Zafarghandi; Majid Maleki; Majid Moini; Pezhman Farshidmehr; Parham Sadeghipour
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2021-05-13

4.  Overview of screening eligibility in patients undergoing ruptured AAA repair from 2003 to 2019 in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

Authors:  Lucas Mota; Christina L Marcaccio; Kirsten D Dansey; Livia E V M de Guerre; Thomas F X O'Donnell; Peter A Soden; Sara L Zettervall; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Epidemiology of endovascular and open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States from 2004 to 2015 and implications for screening.

Authors:  Kirsten D Dansey; Rens R B Varkevisser; Nicholas J Swerdlow; Chun Li; Livia E V M de Guerre; Patric Liang; Christina Marcaccio; Thomas F X O'Donnell; Brett J Carroll; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 4.860

6.  Chemerin-9 Attenuates Experimental Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Formation in ApoE-/- Mice.

Authors:  Shuxiao Chen; Chenglin Han; Shuai Bian; Jianfeng Chen; Xuedong Feng; Gang Li; Xuejun Wu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  Screening Older Adult Men for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Priya Bains; John L Oliffe; Martha H Mackay; Mary T Kelly
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr

8.  Pros and Cons in general medicine and geriatrics, 2019.

Authors:  Domenico Cucinotta
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-03-19

9.  Synchronous and Metachronous Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Gouveia E Melo; Gonçalo Silva Duarte; Alice Lopes; Mariana Alves; Daniel Caldeira; Ruy Fernandes E Fernandes; Luís Mendes Pedro
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  The integrated screening action model (I-SAM): A theory-based approach to inform intervention development.

Authors:  Kathryn A Robb
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.