Literature DB >> 31821431

Association Between Fertility Treatment and Cancer Risk in Children.

Marie Hargreave1, Allan Jensen1, Merete Kjær Hansen2, Christian Dehlendorff2, Jeanette Falck Winther3,4, Kjeld Schmiegelow5,6, Susanne K Kjær1,7.   

Abstract

Importance: An increasing number of children worldwide are born after the use of fertility treatment, although it remains unclear whether the treatment affects the risk of childhood cancer and whether any associations observed are due to the use of specific drugs, the use of specific procedures, or the underlying infertility. Objective: To examine the association between different types of fertility treatments and cancer risk in children. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study based on Danish population-based registry data and the Danish Infertility Cohort (individual record linkage) that included 1 085 172 children born in Denmark between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2012, linked with parental information. There were a total of 2217 children diagnosed with cancer (follow-up occurred during 1996-2015). Exposures: Maternal fertility treatment during the index pregnancy, including the use of fertility drugs (clomiphene [n = 33 835], gonadotropins [n = 57 136], gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs [n = 38 653], human chorionic gonadotropin [n = 68 181], progesterone [n = 41 628], and estrogen [n = 16 948]) and assisted reproductive technology (in vitro fertilization [n = 19 448], intracytoplasmic sperm injection [n = 13 417], and frozen embryo transfer [n = 3356]). Each exposure was examined separately and compared with children born to fertile women. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratios and incidence rate differences for childhood cancer.
Results: After 12.2 million person-years of follow-up (mean, 11.3 years), the incidence rate of childhood cancer was 17.5 per 100 000 for children born to fertile women (n = 910 291) and 44.4 per 100 000 for children born after the use of frozen embryo transfer (n = 3356). Compared with children born to fertile women, the use of frozen embryo transfer was associated with an elevated risk of childhood cancer (14 cancer cases; hazard ratio, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.44 to 4.11]; incidence rate difference, 26.9 [95% CI, 2.8 to 51.0] per 100 000), mainly due to an increased risk of leukemia (5 cancer cases; incidence rate, 14.4 per 100 000; hazard ratio, 2.87 [95% CI, 1.19 to 6.93]; incidence rate difference, 10.1 [95% CI, -4.0 to 24.2] per 100 000) and sympathetic nervous system tumors (<5 cancer cases; hazard ratio, 7.82 [95% CI, 2.47 to 24.70]). There were no statistically significant associations with the use of the other types of fertility treatment examined. Conclusions and Relevance: Among children born in Denmark, the use of frozen embryo transfer, compared with children born to fertile women, was associated with a small but statistically significant increased risk of childhood cancer; this association was not found for the use of other types of fertility treatment examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31821431      PMCID: PMC7081748          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.18037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  29 in total

1.  Cancer risk in children and young adults conceived by in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Bengt Källén; Orvar Finnström; Anna Lindam; Emma Nilsson; Karl-Gösta Nygren; Petra Otterblad Olausson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Association of In Vitro Fertilization With Childhood Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Logan G Spector; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Gerard S Letterie; James P Toner; Kevin Doody; Elizabeth Ginsburg; Melanie Williams; Lori Koch; Maria J Schymura; Barbara Luke
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 16.193

3.  DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro or in vivo.

Authors:  Sunita Katari; Nahid Turan; Marina Bibikova; Oluwatoyin Erinle; Raffi Chalian; Michael Foster; John P Gaughan; Christos Coutifaris; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  A preliminary study on epigenetic changes during boar spermatozoa cryopreservation.

Authors:  Changjun Zeng; Wenpei Peng; Li Ding; Lian He; Yan Zhang; Donghui Fang; Keyi Tang
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  The Danish National Patient Register.

Authors:  Elsebeth Lynge; Jakob Lynge Sandegaard; Matejka Rebolj
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 6.  Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Pinborg; U B Wennerholm; L B Romundstad; A Loft; K Aittomaki; V Söderström-Anttila; K G Nygren; J Hazekamp; C Bergh
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  Fertility treatment and childhood cancer risk: a systematic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marie Hargreave; Allan Jensen; Anita Toender; Klaus Kaae Andersen; Susanne Krüger Kjaer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Validity of breast cancer in the Danish Cancer Registry. A study based on clinical records from one county in Denmark.

Authors:  A R Jensen; J Overgaard; H H Storm
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Cancer risk among children conceived by fertility treatment.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Lizhang Chen; Tubao Yang; Lesan Wang; Lijuan Zhao; Senmao Zhang; Ziwei Ye; Letao Chen; Zan Zheng; Jiabi Qin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Cancer risk among children born after assisted conception.

Authors:  Carrie L Williams; Kathryn J Bunch; Charles A Stiller; Michael F G Murphy; Beverley J Botting; W Hamish Wallace; Melanie Davies; Alastair G Sutcliffe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  19 in total

1.  Air pollution exposure at the residence and risk of childhood cancers in Denmark: A nationwide register-based case-control study.

Authors:  Ulla Arthur Hvidtfeldt; Friederike Erdmann; Stine Kjær Urhøj; Jørgen Brandt; Camilla Geels; Mattias Ketzel; Lise M Frohn; Jesper Heile Christensen; Mette Sørensen; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-10-05

2.  Modified endometriosis fertility index is more accurate to predict the non-ART pregnancy rate following surgery: a cohort of Chinese women.

Authors:  Jiaying Fan; Kang Qin; Kuanrong Li; Xiaojun Li; Qingsheng Huang; Yunsheng Liao; Huiying Liang; Jingying Xie; Yan Yang; Qingfeng Li
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Preserving Oocytes in Oncofertility†.

Authors:  Maria McClam; Shuo Xiao
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  When "facts" are not facts: what does p value really mean, and how does it deceive us?

Authors:  Caiyun Liao; Andrew L Speirs; Sierra Goldsmith; Sherman J Silber
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Developmental Plasticity in Response to Embryo Cryopreservation: The Importance of the Vitrification Device in Rabbits.

Authors:  Ximo Garcia-Dominguez; José Salvador Vicente; Francisco Marco-Jiménez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Abnormal Glucose Metabolism in Male Mice Offspring Conceived by in vitro Fertilization and Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer.

Authors:  Ningxin Qin; Zhiyang Zhou; Wenlong Zhao; Kexin Zou; Weihui Shi; Chuanjin Yu; Xia Liu; Zehan Dong; Yiting Mao; Xinmei Liu; Jianzhong Sheng; Guolian Ding; Yanting Wu; Hefeng Huang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-02-09

7.  Data Resource Profile: Xiamen registry of pregnant women and offspring (REPRESENT): a population-based, long-term follow-up database linking four major healthcare data platforms.

Authors:  Jing Tan; Yiquan Xiong; Yana Qi; Chunrong Liu; Shiyao Huang; Guanhua Yao; Wei Sun; Yongyue Qian; Lishan Ye; Qiushi Xu; Hui Liu; Andy H Lee; Lehana Thabane; Xin Sun
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 8.  Long-term health of children conceived after assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Christina Bergh; Ulla-Britt Wennerholm
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.384

9. 

Authors: 
Journal:  Onkologe (Berl)       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 0.234

10.  Fertility trends and comparisons in a historical cohort of US women with primary infertility.

Authors:  Emily Sadecki; Amy Weaver; Yulian Zhao; Elizabeth A Stewart; Alessandra J Ainsworth
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.