Literature DB >> 31820882

82Rubidium chloride positron emission tomography discrimination of recurrent intracranial malignancy from radiation necrosis.

Ephraim E Parent1, Ila Sethi2, Jonathon Nye3, Chad Holder3, Jeffrey J Olson4, Jeffrey Switchenko5, Funmilayo Tade6, Oladunni O Akin-Akintayo3, Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo3, Akinyemi Akintayo3, David M Schuster3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate identification and discrimination of post treatment changes from recurrent disease remains a challenge for patients with intracranial malignancies despite advances in molecular and magnetic resonance imaging. We have explored the ability of readily available Rubidium-82 chloride (82RbCl) positron emission tomography (PET) to identify and distinguish progressive intracranial disease from radiation necrosis in patients previously treated with radiation therapy.
METHODS: Six patients with a total of 9 lesions of either primary (N.=3) or metastatic (N.=6) intracranial malignancies previously treated with stereotactic radiation surgery (SRS) and persistent contrast enhancement on MRI underwent brain 82RbCl PET imaging. Two patients with arteriovenous malformations previously treated with SRS, also had brain 82RbCl PET imaging for a total of 11 lesions studied. Histological confirmation via stereotactic biopsy/excisional resection was obtained for 9 lesions with the remaining 2 classified as either recurrent tumor or radiation necrosis based on subsequent MRI examinations. 82RbCl PET time activity curve analysis was performed which comprised lesion SUV<inf>max</inf>, contralateral normal brain SUV<inf>max</inf>, and tumor to background ratios (TB<inf>max</inf>).
RESULTS: 82RbCl demonstrates uptake greater than normal brain parenchyma in all lesions studied. Time activity curves demonstrated progressive uptake of 82RbCl in all lesions without evidence of washout. While recurrent disease demonstrated a greater mean SUV<inf>max</inf> compared to radiation necrosis, no statistically significant difference between lesion SUV<inf>max</inf> nor TB<inf>max</inf> was found (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: 82RbCl PET produces high-contrast uptake of both recurrent disease and radiation necrosis compared to normal brain. However, no statistically significant difference was found between recurrent tumor and radiation necrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31820882      PMCID: PMC7958885          DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4785.19.03173-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1824-4785            Impact factor:   2.346


  24 in total

1.  ASFNR recommendations for clinical performance of MR dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging of the brain.

Authors:  K Welker; J Boxerman; A Kalnin; T Kaufmann; M Shiroishi; M Wintermark
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Differentiation of tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in high-grade gliomas using 201Tl-SPECT.

Authors:  Jeanne Tie; Dishan H Gunawardana; Mark A Rosenthal
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  Differentiation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme from radiation necrosis after external beam radiation therapy with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging.

Authors:  Ramon F Barajas; Jamie S Chang; Mark R Segal; Andrew T Parsa; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger; Soonmee Cha
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET in distinguishing recurrent brain tumor from radionecrosis in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  S T Chao; J H Suh; S Raja; S Y Lee; G Barnett
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-06-20       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Dynamic O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography differentiates brain metastasis recurrence from radiation injury after radiotherapy.

Authors:  Garry Ceccon; Philipp Lohmann; Gabriele Stoffels; Natalie Judov; Christian P Filss; Marion Rapp; Elena Bauer; Christina Hamisch; Maximilian I Ruge; Martin Kocher; Klaus Kuchelmeister; Bernd Sellhaus; Michael Sabel; Gereon R Fink; Nadim J Shah; Karl-Josef Langen; Norbert Galldiks
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of adult astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas.

Authors:  Michael Weller; Martin van den Bent; Jörg C Tonn; Roger Stupp; Matthias Preusser; Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal; Roger Henriksson; Emilie Le Rhun; Carmen Balana; Olivier Chinot; Martin Bendszus; Jaap C Reijneveld; Frederick Dhermain; Pim French; Christine Marosi; Colin Watts; Ingela Oberg; Geoffrey Pilkington; Brigitta G Baumert; Martin J B Taphoorn; Monika Hegi; Manfred Westphal; Guido Reifenberger; Riccardo Soffietti; Wolfgang Wick
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  A Noninvasive Method for Quantifying Cerebral Blood Flow by Hybrid PET/MRI.

Authors:  Tracy Ssali; Udunna C Anazodo; Jonathan D Thiessen; Frank S Prato; Keith St Lawrence
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  FDG and (82)Rb PET/MRI features of brain metastasis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yang Lu
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.794

9.  Myocardial rubidium-82 tissue kinetics assessed by dynamic positron emission tomography as a marker of myocardial cell membrane integrity and viability.

Authors:  J vom Dahl; O Muzik; E R Wolfe; C Allman; G Hutchins; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: analysis of outcome and risk of brain radionecrosis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Minniti; Enrico Clarke; Gaetano Lanzetta; Mattia Falchetto Osti; Guido Trasimeni; Alessandro Bozzao; Andrea Romano; Riccardo Maurizi Enrici
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.