| Literature DB >> 31820410 |
Gemma Roberts1,2, Jim J Lloyd3,4, Elizabeth Jefferson4, Joseph P M Kane5, Rory Durcan3, Sarah Lawley3, George S Petrides4, Kim Howe4, Iftikhar Haq6, John T O'Brien7, Alan J Thomas3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Some studies report that assessing regional 123I-cardiac MIBG uptake can aid in the diagnosis of Lewy body disease, but others report heterogeneity in healthy controls. We aimed to evaluate regional cardiac MIBG uptake patterns in healthy older adults and patients with dementia.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac MIBG; SPECT; SPECT artifacts; cardiac MIBG uptake homogeneity; sympathetic innervation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31820410 PMCID: PMC8648658 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01977-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nucl Cardiol ISSN: 1071-3581 Impact factor: 5.952
Rating categories for overall assessment of uptake pattern in the left ventricle and of uptake in each of the ventricular wall regions
| Overall rating categories | Uptake categories for each wall | Interference categories |
|---|---|---|
Not possible to score due to interference Definitely uniform Very slight heterogeneity Patchy Clear defect Multiple clear defects Other - see comment | Normal Mildly reduced/patchy Moderately reduced Severely reduced No uptake | No significant interference Liver interference Lung interference Both liver and lung interference |
Demographics summary for the controls and patients with DLB and AD included in the study
| Controls | DLB | AD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||
| Mean ± SD | 75.2 ± 8.3 | 77.5 ± 8.0 | 76.2 ± 6.8 |
| Range | 62 to 94 years | 60 to 89 years | 62 to 85 years |
| Sex | 7 female (24%) | 2 female (12%) | 4 female (27%) |
| 22 male (76%) | 15 male (88%) | 11 male (73%) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | |||
| Mean ± SD | 27.8 ± 4.2 | Not measured | Not measured |
| Range | 21.6 to 37.8 | ||
| Ethnicity | 28 white (97%) | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 1 Asian (3%) | |||
| Smoking | 13 never smoked (45%) | Not measured | Not measured |
| 13 ex-smokers (45%) | |||
| 2 current smokers (7%) | |||
| 1 not recorded (3%) | |||
| Diabetes | 0 Type I (0%) | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| 3 Type II (10%) | |||
| Systolic blood pressure | |||
| Mean ± SD | 140.5 ± 17.8 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Range | 112 to 173 | ||
| On blood pressure medication | 8 (28%) | 4 (24%) | 5 (33%) |
| Hypercholesterinaemia documented | 11 (34%) | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Documented cardiac history | Previous MI and AF: 1 (3%) | Previous MI: 2 (12%) | Previous MI: 3 (20%) |
| Angina: 1 (3%) | |||
| ECG changes: 1 (3%) | |||
Figure 1Top: Plot of cardiac risk for our control subjects against subject age for males (blue data points) and females (orange data points. The two males with previous cardiac history are shown in open circles. The solid lines correspond to the mean QRISK2 database scores for white males and females with no cardiac risk factors. The database is only available up to 84 years. Bottom: Plots of HMR and minimum relative uptake against cardiac risk. Controls with previous cardiac history are shown in open circles
Figure 2Top: QPS slice data and polar plot for the single control rated as within normal limits, showing almost perfectly uniform MIBG distribution, similar to that seen in normal Tc-99 m myocardial perfusion images. Middle: Slice data and polar plot for a more typical control, with reduced relative MIBG uptake inferiorly and at the apex. Bottom: A very abnormal control but without prior known cardiac events. The sites of reduced relative uptake are shown with white arrows
Frequency of regions showing reduced relative uptake for control, AD, and DLB groups
| Apex | Anterior wall | Lateral wall | Inferior wall | Septal wall | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | 6/26 (23%) | 0 | 2/26 (8%) | 22/26 (85%) | 4/26 (15%) |
| AD | 5/15 (33%) | 0 | 2/15 (13%) | 13/14 (93%) | 4/15 (27%) |
| DLB | 1/5 (20%) | 0 | 0 | 4/5 (80%) | 1/5 (20%) |
Figure 3Example planar images of a control, a DLB patient with normal uptake on planar imaging, and a DLB patient with typical lack of cardiac uptake on planar imaging
Frequency of each overall rating category for control, AD, and probable DLB groups
| Control (n = 29) | AD (n = 15) | DLB (n = 5) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interference present? | 18 (62%) | 10 (67%) | 2 (40%) |
| Not possible to score due to interference | 7 (24%) | 3 (20%) | 1 (20%) |
| Definitely uniform | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Very mild heterogeneity | 1 (3%) | 0 | 0 |
| Patchy | 0 | 1 (7%) | 0 |
| Clear defect | 8 (28%) | 3 (20%) | 2 (40%) |
| Multiple clear defects | 13 (45%) | 8 (53%) | 2 (40%) |
Figure 4Slice data and polar plots for cases with previous MI, with corresponding planar HMRs. The sites of interference (top image) and relative reduced uptake are shown with arrows
Figure 5Left: coronal MIBG slice for the control subject with uniform relative cardiac uptake. Right: a more typical control with high liver uptake relative to the heart. Images are displayed scaled to the maximum voxel