| Literature DB >> 31819362 |
Helen L Kornmann1, Ronald L Fellman1, William J Feuer2, Michelle R Butler1, David G Godfrey1, Oluwatosin U Smith1, Matthew E Emanuel1, Davinder S Grover1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of patients who underwent goniotomy with the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) either as a standalone procedure or in combination with cataract extraction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective chart review included 111 eyes of 90 patients who underwent KDB goniotomy from January to November 2016 at Glaucoma Associates of Texas. KDB goniotomy was combined with cataract surgery in 100 eyes. The main outcome measures were postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of IOP lowering medications.Entities:
Keywords: goniotomy; kahook dual blade; minimally invasive
Year: 2019 PMID: 31819362 PMCID: PMC6896929 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S224643
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ophthalmol ISSN: 1177-5467
Baseline Characteristics
| Patients N (%) | |
|---|---|
| Male Gender | 48 (53%) |
| Self-Identified Ethnicity | |
| African American | 18 (20%) |
| Asian | 3 (3%) |
| Hispanic | 6 (7%) |
| Caucasian | 52 (58%) |
| Multi-ethnic | 5 (6%) |
| Native American | 3 (3%) |
| Declined to answer | 3 (3%) |
| Eyes | |
| Glaucoma Diagnosis | |
| POAG | 66 (60%) |
| CNAG | 12 (11%) |
| Pseudoexfoliation | 4 (4%) |
| PDG | 5 (5%) |
| LTG | 8 (7%) |
| Other | 16 (14%) |
| Preoperative IOP | |
| <14 mmHg | 26 (23%) |
| 14–<18 mmHg 40 (36%) | |
| 18–21 mmHg 30 (27%) | |
| >21 mmHg | 15 (14%) |
| Preoperative Number of Medications | |
| <2 | 33 (30%) |
| 2 | 31 (28%) |
| 3 | 24 (22%) |
| 4–6 | 23 (21%) |
| Preoperative Visual Acuity | |
| 20/20–20/40 | 87 (78%) |
| 20/50–20/80 | 16 (14%) |
| 20/100–20/400 | 6 (5%) |
| CF, HM | 2 (2%) |
| Eye Undergoing Surgery, Right | 62 (56%) |
| Prior CE | 4 (4%) |
| Combined with CE | 100 (90%) |
Abbreviations: CE, cataract extraction; CF, counting fingers; CNAG, chronic narrow angle glaucoma; HM, hand motion; IOP, intraocular pressure; LTG, low tension glaucoma; PDG, pigment dispersion glaucoma; POAG, primary open-angle glaucoma.
Figure 1Intraocular pressure (IOP, mmHg) at baseline and at follow-up. There is an early drop in IOP that remains relatively stable during the first 12 months of follow-up. (Error bar = 1 standard deviation).
KDB Efficacy on IOP and Medication Use by Preoperative IOP Levels and Follow-Up Visit
| Preoperative IOP Group | Measure of Efficacy | POM 1 | POM 3 | POM 6 | POM 9 | POM 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <14mmHg | Number (N) | 26 | 24 | 18 | 23 | 21 |
| Mean (SD) IOP lowering | -2.0 (4.2) | -0.4 (2.9) | -1.3 (2.9) | -2.2 (2.6) | -1.8 (3.5) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% | 3 (12%) | 3 (13%) | 2 (11%) | 0 | 2 (10%) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% or decrease in number of meds | 22 (85%) | 20 (83%) | 15 (83%) | 18 (78%) | 17 (81%) | |
| 14–17.9 mmHg | Number (N) | 38 | 35 | 32 | 22 | 26 |
| Mean (SD) IOP lowering | 1.3 (4.6) | 2.2 (3.0) | 2.1 (2.8) | 1.7 (2.7) | 1.8 (3.0) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% | 10 (26%) | 16 (46%) | 13 (41%) | 7 (32%) | 9 (35%) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% or decrease in number of meds | 33 (87%) | 31 (89%) | 29 (91%) | 20 (91%) | 21 (81%) | |
| 18–21 | Number (N) | 30 | 28 | 20 | 23 | 18 |
| mmHg | Mean (SD) IOP lowering | 4.0 (3.7) | 4.6 (4.1) | 4.4 (4.3) | 3.9 (3.6) | 2.4 (3.6) |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% | 14 (48%) | 14 (50%) | 10 (50%) | 12 (52%) | 7 (39%) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% or decrease in number of meds | 24 (80%) | 24 (86%) | 16 (80%) | 20 (87%) | 13 (72%) | |
| >21 mmHg | Number (N) | 15 | 15 | 9 | 4 | 7 |
| Mean (SD) IOP lowering | 8.1 (8.8) | 9.7 (7.2) | 5.9 (5.1) | 8.6 (1.1) | 8.6 (4.7) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% | 12 (80%) | 10 (67%) | 5 (56%) | 4 (100%) | 6 (86%) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% or decrease in number of meds | 15 (100%) | 14 (93%) | 7 (78%) | 4 (100%) | 7 (100%) | |
| Total | Number (N) | 109 | 102 | 79 | 72 | 72 |
| Mean (SD) IOP lowering | 2.2 (6.0) | 3.4 (5.2) | 2.4 (4.2) | 1.5 (4.2) | 1.6 (4.5) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% | 39 (36%) | 43 (42%) | 30 (38%) | 23 (32%) | 24 (33%) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% or decrease in number of meds | 94 (86%) | 89 (87%) | 67 (85%) | 62 (86%) | 58 (81%) |
Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; KDB, Kahook Dual Blade; POM, postoperative month; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 2Glaucoma medication use at baseline and at follow-up. There is an early and sustained decrease in medication use after Kahook dual blade goniotomy. (Error bar = 1 standard deviation).
KDB Efficacy on IOP and Medication Use by Preoperative Number of Medications and Follow-Up Visit
| Preoperative Number of Medications | Measure of Efficacy | POM 1 | POM 3 | POM 6 | POM 9 | POM 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 or 1 | Number (N) | 32 | 28 | 24 | 24 | 22 |
| Mean (SD) meds decreased | 0.6 (0.9) | 0.6 (0.9) | 0.9 (0.4) | 0.8 (0.5) | 0.6 (0.6) | |
| N (%) ≥1 fewer meds | 24 (75%) | 22 (79%) | 22 (92%) | 19 (79%) | 15 (68%) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% or decrease in number of meds | 26 (81%) | 24 (86%) | 22 (92%) | 20 (83%) | 16 (73%) | |
| 2 | Number (N) | 31 | 29 | 22 | 22 | 24 |
| Mean (SD) meds decreased | 1.3 (0.9) | 1.2 (1.1) | 1.0 (1.3) | 1.1 (1.3) | 0.9 (1.2) | |
| N (%) ≥1 fewer meds | 23 (74%) | 22 (76%) | 15 (68%) | 16 (73%) | 16 (67%) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% or decrease in number of meds | 25 (81%) | 25 (86%) | 17 (77%) | 18 (82%) | 19 (79%) | |
| 3 | Number (N) | 24 | 22 | 17 | 16 | 14 |
| Mean (SD) meds decreased | 2.2 (1.0) | 1.8 (1.2) | 1.9 (1.4) | 1.6 (1.2) | 2 (1.2) | |
| N (%) ≥1 fewer meds | 23 (96%) | 19 (86%) | 12 (71%) | 13 (81%) | 12 (86%) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% or decrease in number of meds | 23 (96%) | 20 (91%) | 14 (82%) | 14 (88%) | 12 (86%) | |
| 4–6 | Number (N) | 22 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 12 |
| Mean (SD) meds decreased | 3.1 (1.5) | 2.5 (1.5) | 1.9 (1.7) | 1.5 (1.4) | 1.9 (1.7) | |
| N (%) ≥1 fewer meds | 20 (91%) | 20 (87%) | 13 (81%) | 13 (81%) | 11 (92%) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% or decrease in number of meds | 20 (91%) | 20 (87%) | 14 (88%) | 10 (100%) | 11 (92%) | |
| Total | Number (N) | 109 | 102 | 79 | 72 | 72 |
| Mean (SD) meds decreased | 1.7 (1.4) | 1.5 (1.3) | 1.3 (1.3) | 1.2 (1.1) | 1.2 (1.3) | |
| N (%) ≥1 fewer meds | 90 (83%) | 83 (81%) | 62 (79%) | 9 (90%) | 54 (75%) | |
| N (%) IOP lowered 20% or decrease in number of meds | 94 (86%) | 89 (87%) | 67 (85%) | 62 (86%) | 11 (92%) |
Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; KDB, Kahook Dual Blade; POM, postoperative month; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier cumulative failure rates by preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) group. Eyes with preoperative IOP >21 mmHg were statistically significantly more likely to undergo reoperation than those with IOP between 18 mmHg and 21 mmHg (p = 0.038, log-rank test) and those with preoperative IOP <18 mmHg (p = 0.005).