EXPRESSION OF THE RENIN-ANGIOTENSIN SYSTEM COMPONENTS IN ONCOLOGIC DISEASES.

The literature devoted to changes in the expression of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) proteins of cancer cells was analyzed. The dynamics of RAS protein expression in malignant tumors and the possible role of epigenetic mechanisms in these processes are briefly reviewed. Through research of the epigenetic mechanisms in cancer, principally new techniques for their correction based on the use of selective regulatory systems of covalent modification of histone proteins (for example, deacetylase inhibitor) and microRNA synthesis technologies have been developed. Literature data show promising pharmacological correction of epigenetic modification of chromatin in the treatment of cancer.

Introduction

According to the literature, the components of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may participate in the processes of neoplastic tissues, stimulate growth and metastasis of tumors (-). Earlier studies have demonstrated diagnostic and prognostic value of analyzing the expression of RAS components in oncology (). A number of modern publications include reaffirmation of the research components of RAS in oncology in terms of diagnostic value of analyzing the expression of RAS components, prediction of the course of the disease and pharmacological effects on malignant tumors (, , ). Stimulation of local production of angiotensin-II (A-2), increase in the expression of A-2 receptors, rebalancing of the expression of angiotensin-I-converting enzymes (ACE-1 and ACE-2) and their reaction products, and the level of A-2 and A-1-7 formation are regarded as the key pathogenic mechanisms of growth and metastasis of malignant tumors (, , ). The focus of some studies is assessing the risk of carcinogenesis induction by RAS inhibitors (, -). At the same time, the pathogenetic mechanisms that induce an increase in the expression of the RAS protein components in cell malignization, and their role in the processes of growth and metastasis of malignant tumors remain poorly understood.

Diagnostic Value of RAS Protein Components in Oncology

We consider it necessary to provide brief information on the diagnostic value of the analysis of the expression of the main components of RAS in various oncologic diseases.

A-2 receptors

In normal and pathologic conditions, A-2 exerts its influence through the AT1 and AT2 receptor populations. It has been established that in human astrocytoma cells, the detection rate of AT1 receptors in patients with high-grade malignancy (grades III and IV) increases to 67% versus 10% in the low-grade group, which positively correlates with the cell proliferation intensity and neoangiogenesis density (, ). In studies on experimental animals, in inoculated culture of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells it was found that A-2 through the AT1 and AT2 receptors stimulated migration of malignant cells and their metastasis in the liver (). The cells of non-small cell lung cancer exhibiting high expression levels of the AT1 receptor have been reported to be resistant to the effects of cytostatics (, ). Analysis of clinical observations suggests that increased expression of AT1 receptors by malignant cells indicates an unfavorable prognosis of the course of the disease because A1 effects are realized through AT1 receptors aimed at stimulating growth and metastasis of the tumor, i.e. neoangiogenesis (, ). It is emphasized that activation of the A-2/AT1 pathway for realization of the pre-oncogenic effects of A-2, which has a pleiotropic effect, has an impact on lymphocytes or tumor-associated macrophages, which leads to a decrease in anticancer immunity, and changes in the production of interleukins and proinflammatory cytokines (, ). A sharp, according to some data more than 100-fold increase in the transformed AT1 cells of the protein occurs due to the activation of the AGTR1 gene encoding the AT1 protein (). It is possible that the stimulation of neoangiogenesis, realized through the AT1 receptors, is one of the universal pathogenetic mechanisms of the progression of tumors of various genesis (, ). There are data on the synergistic effects of AT1/A-2 and AT2/A-2 systems in the stimulation of neoangiogenesis () and cell migration, inflammation and extracellular matrix formation via AT1 and AT2 receptors (). It has been shown that changes in the expression of AT1 and AT2 receptors are regarded as markers of malignancy of gastric mucosa, induced Helicobacter pylori (), progression of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (), progression of colorectal cancer risk and metastasis (, ), diagnosis of lung cancer () and mammary gland cancer (). The level of A-2 receptor expression is regarded as a prognostic criterion for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma () and renal clear-cell carcinoma (). Along with this, according to some authors, in some cases, the mechanisms of change in the expression of AT1 and AT2 with tumor progression reflect a much more complex picture of the rearrangement of the malignant tissue sensitivity to the effects of humoral factors (, , , , ).

It should be noted that in a number of modern review publications, results of the study of the specific features of AT1 and AT2 expression of A-2 receptors in various oncologic diseases, their diagnostic and prognostic value are interpreted in detail, arguments are presented in terms of their role in the pathogenesis of diseases, progression and dissemination of tumors, and the promise of clinical use of selective A-2 receptor antagonists in order to increase the effectiveness of chemotherapy, immunotherapy and neoangiogenesis inhibitors in oncology (, , , , ).

Angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE-1)

Angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE), carboxydipeptidase, is one of the key factors involved in the conversion of angiotensin-I (A-1) into physiologically active angiotensin-II (A-2). However, in pathology, including cancer, the role of ACE in the formation of A-2 can be significantly reduced by increasing the contribution of the ACE-independent conversion path of A-1 to A-2 in the presence of chymase and other peptidases, increasing the resistance of tumor cells to anticancer therapies (, , ). It is widely known that ACE, having a relatively low substrate specificity, can participate not only in the formation of A-2, but also in kinins, as well as other physiologically active molecules that are potentially relevant to the processes of carcinogenesis, growth and dissemination of tumors (, ). Attention is drawn to the information that ACE, in addition to peptidase activity, can directly participate in the intracellular signal transduction of A-2, actually being a receptor of A-232. According to the authors of the cited publication, the mechanism of ACE-dependent reception A-2 can play an important role in managing the migration and proliferation of cancer cells. Consequently, the dynamics of changes in the topology and expression levels of ACE in cancer can serve as a marker for the localization of the pro-oncogenic effects of A-2 and other humoral factors, the metabolism of which is related to the functions of the components of the RAS. For example, in cancer of the kidneys, a regular change in the activity and topology of expression of ACE proteins has been observed (, ). Normally, the epithelium of the cortical segments of the tubule of the nephron, in particular the epithelium of the proximal section, shows high rates of ACE expression, which is absent in the clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) and is detected only in the blood vessels of the tumor (, ). The authors showed that the level of protein expression in the tumor and the magnitude of its enzymatic activity in plasma could serve as a marker in CCRCC patients and overall survival of CCRCC patients. On the other hand, inhibition of neoangiogenesis in malignant neoplasms by ACE blockers is considered as one of the main indications for the use of drugs in this group in oncology (). The results of experimental studies have shown that micro-contractions of tumor cells in mice vaccinated with intestinal cancer cells, which contribute to escape from anticancer immunity, are formed by macrophages and cancer-associated fibroblasts (). According to the authors, the expression level of ACE sharply increased in macrophages, which may indicate an increase in the intensity of the local production of immunosuppressive molecules, such as nitric oxide, TGF-b1, PGE2. Normally, the expression of ACE is critical for the formation of a specific microenvironment in the processes of cytodifferentiation at the stage of embryonic organ development or in intensively proliferating tissues. However, an excessively high level of expression is not only associated with impaired hematopoiesis, but is also considered as the effect of ACE in neoplastic hematologic diseases, including neoplastic hematopoiesis (). A significant increase in the expression of ACE in larynx cancer indicates an unfavorable course of the disease and a high risk of tumor metastasis (, ). Thus, changes in the expression of ACE, both increase and decrease, along with the study of the ACE gene polymorphism, are widely used in modern oncology as a marker of the disease severity and prognosis (). However, according to some authors, the level of ACE expression by malignant tumor cells does not always correlate with the intensity of local production of A-2, due to the increased activity of chymase, which regulates ACE-independent pathway of A-2 formation (). In addition, it is necessary to take into account that ACE is directly involved in the regulation of the body immune responses ().

Angiotensin-I-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2) and ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/MAS1 axis

The ACE-2 homolog of ACE-1 is responsible for metabolic clearance of A-2; the enzyme is used as a substrate for the synthesis of angiotensin-1-7 (A-1-7). In turn, A-1-7, exercising regulatory effect through MAS1-receptors, has opposite vasotonic action and proinflammatory prosclerotic effects to A-237. Reducing the level of ACE-2 expression in breast cancer cells is considered as a marker of the severe form of the disease with a high risk of metastasis (). According to the authors, the level of expression of ACE-2 represents the degree of the ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/MAS1 axis influence to limit transformation of calcium-dependent intracellular signaling pathways characteristic of the process of malignant transformation of cells. It was shown that the expression level of ACE-2 was negatively correlated with the intensity of neoangiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer and the sensitivity of tumor cells to cytostatics. The ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/MAS1 axis has an inhibitory effect on VEGFa and matrix metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 secretion, aids in limiting neoangiogenesis, increases the sensitivity of tumors to cytostatic drugs, and reduces the risk of metastasis (, ). A number of publications indicate that hypoxia is a hallmark of solid tumors and that hypoxia conditions contribute to strengthening the pro-oncogenic effect of ACE-1/A-2 against the background of reducing the effects of ACE-2/Ang-(1-7)/MAS1 axis (). The authors of the cited publication showed that hypoxia in vitro in Lewis lung carcinoma cell culture contributed to a decrease in the expression of ACE-2 and ACE/A-2/AT1-dependent induction of VEGF. Arguments are made in favor of the promising clinical use of A-1-7 as a factor in anticancer treatment of breast tumors the cells of which do not express estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-242. Some reviews also contain positive assessment of the prospects for the ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/MAS1 axis in anticancer pharmacology (). At the same time, it is emphasized that the nature of the influence of ACE-2/Ang-(1-7)/MAS1 axis on cancer cells and tumor progression may depend on the location of the tumor (, , ). In particular, there is evidence that A-1-7 stimulates the migration of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells, up-regulation of proinflammatory genes, has a significant impact on RCC development and progression (). The authors tend to conclude that A-1-7 with respect to RCC has a pro-oncogenic effect.

Angiotensinogen

Angiotensinogen (Agt) is the universal precursor of A-2 and A-1-7. Normally, Agt is mainly synthesized in the liver. In cancer, the liver typically remains the main source of Agt (). However, of interest are data on the diagnostic value of Agt local products as a marker of carcinogenesis. Particular metabolic Agt cancer cells have also attracted attention. On the one hand, Agt is regarded as one of the most informative markers of tumor neoangiogenesis activity (, , ). On the other hand, according to the cited publications, a dominant Agt conversion product in tumor tissues is A-2. Thus, the combined effect of HIF-1-alpha and A-2 against the higher production of Agt is considered as the basic pathogenetic mechanism of stimulation of growth factors (especially VEGFa) activating tumor neoangiogenesis. Indeed, the results of clinical studies have shown that, firstly, overexpression of Agt gene in glioblastoma patients can be regarded as a marker of tumor resistance to anti-cancer therapy based on the inhibition of tumor neoangiogenesis (). Secondly, higher Agt gene expression in tumor tissue is accompanied by increased local production of A-2. However, there are literature data that Agt possesses the ability to inhibit neoangiogenesis (). When discussing local products of Agt, it is necessary to clarify that, according to some authors, stimulation of the local expression of RAS components, including Agt, is considered as a central inducer of intracellular cascade of regulatory proteins that determine the processes of malignancy and metastatic cells (). Moreover, the reported results do not preclude the activation of intracellular metabolism and adjustment of RAS components in cancer cells (), which is consistent with the opinion on the universal pathogenetic role of the activation of intracellular RAS, also implicating modulation of the gene expression processes (, ). However, tissue-specific expression patterns are emphasized in Agt as a marker of cancer risk. In particular, the risk of lung cancer is associated with reduction of protein production (). According to the authors, epigenetic mechanisms of gene expression reducing Agt and point mutations of the gene can be considered as factors that increase the risk of lung cancer. Perhaps the dynamics of local production of Agt and its plasma levels may be different from the prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (). The authors found that the increasing serum Agt levels were significantly associated with worse overall survival, and epithelial expression of Agt was significantly associated with improved progression-free survival. Another aspect of the diagnostic value of the local production of Agt in tumor tissues may be due to natural variation of Agt gene expression, as the disease increases the risk of lung cancer (). The authors found that increasing serum Agt levels were significantly associated with worse overall survival, and epithelial expression of Agt was significantly associated with improved progression-free survival ().

(Pro)renin

Recently, the (pro)renin molecule and its receptors are attracting increasing attention not only as a regulatory RAS enzyme but also as an important element of ontogenesis control mechanisms of wound healing and pathogenesis of several diseases (). Some reviews on the pathogenetic role of RAS in cancer patients found important information about the impact of renin on the processes of malignancy cells and tumor progression (, ). In vitro studies have shown that renin may have a stimulating effect on cell growth in renal carcinoma cell culture (). Expression of renin can be considered as a marker of normal maturation of blood cells or their precursors of malignancy (). The authors of the cited survey emphasize that renin expression was detected in acute myeloid leukemia blast cells, in cells of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoid leukemia. It is reported that bone marrow progenitors express renin and become the source of lymphoblastic leukemia (). Renin progenitors have been identified in mouse bone marrow, giving rise to B-cell leukemia (). There are data that the renin gene expression in normal and malignant hematopoiesis can be controlled by epigenetic mechanisms (, ). In the context of the topic, it is relevant to recall that complex functioning, relatively little studied, of the receptor system to the (pro)renin is relevant not only to the RAS but also to the regulation of gene expression of the protein inductor processes of inflammation and tissue fibrosis (, ). Further studies confirmed the RAS-independent effects of the receptor system for (pro)renin, demonstrating their fundamental role in the regulation of cell homeostasis control mechanisms (). It was also found that plasma levels of (pro)renin receptor ((P)RR) in the cancer patient group were dramatically increased (). Based on the analysis of the dynamics of (P)RR expression in cells at various stages of malignancy, the authors concluded that (P)RR may be profoundly involved in ductal tumorigenesis in the pancreas. Results of studying in vitro expression of (P)RR in cultured human glioma cell suggest that this receptor may be both a prognostic marker and a therapeutic target for glioma (). Data on change in the expression of (P)RR in the process of hematopoiesis may be regarded as a promising diagnostic marker for promyelocytic leukemia ().

Epigenetic Mechanisms as Possible Regulators of Expression of RAS Components in Oncology

The above summary of the dynamics of the expression of RAS components in tumor tissues indicates that, firstly, this figure can rise significantly in tissue, which normally does not have high levels of expression of RAS components (, , , , ). Conversely, in certain oncologic diseases, cells gradually lose their inherent ability to express normal RAS proteins (, ). Secondly, there is regular expression and topology change of RAS proteins in tumor tissues, depending on the current stage and severity of the disease (, , ). A number of publications provide evidence for the leading role of epigenetic mechanisms in the change of the synthesis of proteins capable of stimulating the processes of malignancy, inflammation, fibrosis, and metastasis (, -). In this case, attention is paid to the restructuring epigenetic gene expression of RAS components in the processes of malignancy and growth of cancer cells (, , , ). Epigenetic reorganization of the expression of RAS components is a relatively new and little-studied area in oncology. Normally, the impact on the dynamics of epigenetic mechanisms of gene expression of RAS proteins is observed in early stages and histologic organogenesis and in intensively proliferating tissues (, ). It is reported that one of the universal inducers of gene expression of RAS components of proteins, i.e. progression of malignant neoplasms, can be HIF-1alpha (, , ). Several factors related to diabetes have also been found to affect the expression of genes of RAS proteins, increasing the risk of cancer (, -). It is possible that HIF-1alpha directly participates in the regulation of expression of angiotensinogen (Agt) (). In turn, Agt is required for the increased production of A-2, stimulating tumor neovascularization and metastasis by AT1 receptors. It is reported that olmesartan, an AT1-receptor antagonist, could up-regulate miR-205 and inhibit VEGF-expression and cancer cells (). Consequently, A-2 may be considered as a regulator of the transcription process. Indeed, experimental studies have shown that A-2 can enhance the production of proinflammatory cytokines (IFNγ, TNFα) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP2, MMP9), stimulating cancer cell adhesion to endothelial cells, trans-endothelial migration and tumor cell migration across extracellular matrix (). Along with this, universality of epigenetic adjustment of the expression of RAS components in pathogenesis including cancer has been suggested (, ). On the other hand, there are data on the epigenetic effects of A-1-7, limiting the mobility of cancer cells and their ability to metastasize (). From this perspective, of particular importance are data on the ability of ACE-1 to participate in intracellular signaling mechanisms of A-232. No less relevant is the importance of the (pro)renin-(pro)renin receptor information systems in the control of gene expression, regardless of the state of RAS activity (, ). The results of other studies confirm the thesis that the (pro)renin-(pro)renin receptor system has an important function in cancer pathogenesis and progression (, , , , ).

Oncologic Aspects of Expression of RAS Components and Local Renin-Angiotensin System

The concept of ‘local races’ was formed as an idea of the element inorganic humoral complex homeostatic control of body functions. This point of local renal RAS can be illustrated by the following example. Normally, appropriate stimulus for activation of intrarenal RAS has two distinct mechanisms: a renal baroreceptor and sodium chloride delivery to the macula densa. As a result, it increases secretion of the cell juxta-glomerular apparatus RAS regulatory enzyme renin and increases production of A-2. Basic renotropic physiologic effects of A-2 are exerted mainly on the parameters of renal hemodynamics and filtration processes at proximal nephron, including initiation effects through controlling transcription regulatory proteins and transport in proximal nephrocytes (, ). Under physiologic conditions, the induction of renin secretion () and stimulation of the A-2 transcription transport proteins tubular epithelium () are adequate to the current state of the body water-salt balance. For example, a diet-induced hyponatrium physiologic stimulation of RAS is not reflected by increased urinary Agt or development of renal injury (). Consequently, the end result of a complex set of activities of humoral regulators of intrarenal homeostatic control system is to maintain stable blood pressure parameters, ion homeostasis, acid-base equilibrium and constant volume of extracellular body fluids (, , , ), induction of renin secretion () and stimulation of the A-2 transcription transport protein tubular epithelium () adequate to the current state of the body water-salt balance.

On the other hand, hypoxia, oxidative stress, high blood glucose levels, and other adverse factors are capable of inducing epigenetic mechanisms of activation of inflammation and fibrosis of renal parenchyma, including topology change RAS components through gene expression control mechanisms (, , ). An important result of these events is strengthening of renin secretion in renal parenchyma (), arteriolar smooth muscle cells, mesangial cells and interstitial cells by epigenetic gene expression control mechanisms (, ). Renin is a regulatory enzyme for RAS determining the intensity of further A-2 production. The accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in tissue enhances renal excretion of Agt in urine, reinforcing feedback loop between ROS activation and subsequent activation of ROS synthesis of Agt (). It is shown that the infusion of animal A-2 is essential to activate the biosynthesis of Agt by proximal nephrocytes, leading to further increase in tubular products of A-2 and enhancing its pathogenic influence (). In general, accumulation of RAS components in proximal nephrocytes increased intracellular production of A-2 and its effects on the transcription process, mitochondrial function, amplification of ROS products as one of the basic pathogenetic mechanisms of homeostatic disturbances of kidney function (, , ). Renal excretion of Agt is recommended to be used as a diagnostic criterion for pathologic transformation of intrarenal RAS (, , ).

Thus, pathologic intrarenal RAS transformation is carried out as follows: 1) under the control of epigenetic mechanisms that alter transcription processes, including RAS protein components; 2) the advent of ectopic foci biosynthesis of key components of RAS proteins; 3) strengthening of intracellular production of A-2 and increasing its influence on the transcription of proteins; and 4) weakening the expression of ACE-2 and decreased production of A-1-7, the effects of which are opposite to A-2.

As a result, in contrast to physiologic conditions, pathologic change in topology and level of expression of RAS components leads to the following: 1) emergence of ectopic foci and increased intracellular RAS tubular epithelium; 2) formation of ectopic foci RAS (renin, angiotensinogen) facilitates the escape of trigger for RAS activation in respect of regulatory stimulant settings of body water-salt balance and hemodynamics; 3) interaction of ectopic foci of RAS remains, but this interaction is not directed to maintaining homeostasis, but it further provides unlimited induction of expression of RAS components and other regulatory proteins that promote fibrosis, inflammation and hypertrophy of the renal parenchyma cells; and 4) there is transformation of intracellular signal transduction systems () and balance of the A-2 and A-1-7 regulatory action in the direction of enhancing the activity of ACE-1 and alpha-chymase on lower ACE expression (). Note that these changes occur as a result of adjustment of the expression of RAS components in tumor cells inducing cell malignancy, fibrosis, and tissue inflammation, neoangiogenesis, metastasis and immunosuppression (, , ). Also, in the pathogenesis and progression of renal failure, the components of RAS cancer cells are not involved in performing homeostatic functions.

From the point of view of practical medicine, it comes to expediency of utilizing RAS blockers in the treatment of cancer. In our opinion, some aspects can be distinguished in this respect. On the one hand, enhancement of expression of ectopic foci of cancer cells, RAS, at first glance, gives reason to expect performance using ACE inhibitors and A-2 receptor antagonists in the treatment of cancer. Indeed, monotherapy with RAS blockers in cancer may exhibit relatively moderate therapeutic result. It is reported how to enhance the anticancer effects of RAS inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy (). Along with this, it indicates the potential risks associated with the use of certain RAS blockers in the treatment of specific cancers (), up to their use being considered completely inappropriate (-). On the other hand, qualitatively different methods may be developed for their pharmacological correction based on epigenetic mechanisms modulating and suppressing ectopic RAS activity (, ). Based on the analysis of the nature of the expression of the RAS ectopic foci, there is a concept of the universal role of epigenetic mechanisms in the pathogenesis of ectopic formation of RAS in oncologic and non-oncologic diseases (, , ). Promising methods of treating cancer, completely based on the epigenetic mechanisms using synthetic microRNA have been postulated (, ). There are new prospects for the use of selective modulators of epigenetic processes in medical practice and of interest in oncology, confirming information on the readiness of application of this group of pharmacological agents (deacetylase inhibitors) in preclinical trials ().

Conclusion

A review of the literature has shown that the variation of the expression of RAS components is closely related to the pathogenesis of neoplastic transformation of cancer cell progression, as well as stimulation of the processes of metastasis. Information on the state of expression of protein RAS components contributes to the understanding of the mechanisms of carcinogenesis and dissemination of tumor cells. These data allow the use of qualitative and quantitative expression parameters of RAS components as markers of cancer severity. Tight engagement of RAS components in carcinogenesis was the basis for using the RAS inhibitor (ACE inhibitor-1 receptor antagonists and A-2) in therapy of cancer. However, analysis of the causes of changes in the expression of RAS protein in tumor cells has revealed that very significant function belongs to epigenetic mechanisms of regulation of gene expression in these processes. Through research of epigenetic mechanisms in cancer, new techniques for their correction have been developed principally based on the use of selective regulator systems of covalent modification-histone proteins (e.g., deacetylase inhibitor) and microRNA synthesis technology. The published data on the pharmacological properties of these drugs suggest their prospects for effective treatment of cancer.