Sébastien J Dumas1,2, Elda Meta1,2, Mila Borri1,2, Jermaine Goveia1,2, Katerina Rohlenova1,2, Nadine V Conchinha1,2, Kim Falkenberg1,2, Laure-Anne Teuwen1,2, Laura de Rooij1,2, Joanna Kalucka1,2, Rongyuan Chen3, Shawez Khan1,2, Federico Taverna1,2, Weisi Lu3, Magdalena Parys1,2, Carla De Legher1,2, Stefan Vinckier1,2, Tobias K Karakach1,2, Luc Schoonjans1,2,3, Lin Lin4,5, Lars Bolund4,5, Mieke Dewerchin1,2, Guy Eelen1,2, Ton J Rabelink6, Xuri Li7, Yonglun Luo8,5,9,10, Peter Carmeliet11,2,3. 1. Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium. 2. Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Center for Cancer Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Leuven, Belgium. 3. State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 4. Lars Bolund Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI)-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, China. 5. Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 6. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Einthoven Laboratory for Vascular and Regenerative Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 7. State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; peter.carmeliet@kuleuven.vib.be alun@biomed.au.dk. 8. Lars Bolund Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI)-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, China; peter.carmeliet@kuleuven.vib.be alun@biomed.au.dk. 9. China National GeneBank, Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI)-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China; and. 10. Qingdao-Europe Advanced Institute for Life Sciences, Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI)-Qingdao, Qingdao, China. 11. Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Angiogenesis and Vascular Metabolism, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium; peter.carmeliet@kuleuven.vib.be alun@biomed.au.dk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Renal endothelial cells from glomerular, cortical, and medullary kidney compartments are exposed to different microenvironmental conditions and support specific kidney processes. However, the heterogeneous phenotypes of these cells remain incompletely inventoried. Osmotic homeostasis is vitally important for regulating cell volume and function, and in mammals, osmotic equilibrium is regulated through the countercurrent system in the renal medulla, where water exchange through endothelium occurs against an osmotic pressure gradient. Dehydration exposes medullary renal endothelial cells to extreme hyperosmolarity, and how these cells adapt to and survive in this hypertonic milieu is unknown. METHODS: We inventoried renal endothelial cell heterogeneity by single-cell RNA sequencing >40,000 mouse renal endothelial cells, and studied transcriptome changes during osmotic adaptation upon water deprivation. We validated our findings by immunostaining and functionally by targeting oxidative phosphorylation in a hyperosmolarity model in vitro and in dehydrated mice in vivo. RESULTS: We identified 24 renal endothelial cell phenotypes (of which eight were novel), highlighting extensive heterogeneity of these cells between and within the cortex, glomeruli, and medulla. In response to dehydration and hypertonicity, medullary renal endothelial cells upregulated the expression of genes involved in the hypoxia response, glycolysis, and-surprisingly-oxidative phosphorylation. Endothelial cells increased oxygen consumption when exposed to hyperosmolarity, whereas blocking oxidative phosphorylation compromised endothelial cell viability during hyperosmotic stress and impaired urine concentration during dehydration. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a high-resolution atlas of the renal endothelium and highlights extensive renal endothelial cell phenotypic heterogeneity, as well as a previously unrecognized role of oxidative phosphorylation in the metabolic adaptation of medullary renal endothelial cells to water deprivation.
BACKGROUND: Renal endothelial cells from glomerular, cortical, and medullary kidney compartments are exposed to different microenvironmental conditions and support specific kidney processes. However, the heterogeneous phenotypes of these cells remain incompletely inventoried. Osmotic homeostasis is vitally important for regulating cell volume and function, and in mammals, osmotic equilibrium is regulated through the countercurrent system in the renal medulla, where water exchange through endothelium occurs against an osmotic pressure gradient. Dehydration exposes medullary renal endothelial cells to extreme hyperosmolarity, and how these cells adapt to and survive in this hypertonic milieu is unknown. METHODS: We inventoried renal endothelial cell heterogeneity by single-cell RNA sequencing >40,000 mouse renal endothelial cells, and studied transcriptome changes during osmotic adaptation upon water deprivation. We validated our findings by immunostaining and functionally by targeting oxidative phosphorylation in a hyperosmolarity model in vitro and in dehydrated mice in vivo. RESULTS: We identified 24 renal endothelial cell phenotypes (of which eight were novel), highlighting extensive heterogeneity of these cells between and within the cortex, glomeruli, and medulla. In response to dehydration and hypertonicity, medullary renal endothelial cells upregulated the expression of genes involved in the hypoxia response, glycolysis, and-surprisingly-oxidative phosphorylation. Endothelial cells increased oxygen consumption when exposed to hyperosmolarity, whereas blocking oxidative phosphorylation compromised endothelial cell viability during hyperosmotic stress and impaired urine concentration during dehydration. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a high-resolution atlas of the renal endothelium and highlights extensive renal endothelial cell phenotypic heterogeneity, as well as a previously unrecognized role of oxidative phosphorylation in the metabolic adaptation of medullary renal endothelial cells to water deprivation.
Authors: Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Wanja M Bernhardt; Alexander Weidemann; Christina Warnecke; Christian Rosenberger; Michael S Wiesener; Carsten Willam Journal: Kidney Int Suppl Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.545
Authors: Smail Messaoudi; Ying He; Alex Gutsol; Andrew Wight; Richard L Hébert; Ragnar O Vilmundarson; Andrew P Makrigiannis; John Chalmers; Pavel Hamet; Johanne Tremblay; Ruth McPherson; Alexandre F R Stewart; Rhian M Touyz; Mona Nemer Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Coen C W G Bongers; Mohammad Alsady; Tom Nijenhuis; Anouk D M Tulp; Thijs M H Eijsvogels; Peter M T Deen; Maria T E Hopman Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2018-06
Authors: Rajasree Menon; Edgar A Otto; Paul Hoover; Sean Eddy; Laura Mariani; Bradley Godfrey; Celine C Berthier; Felix Eichinger; Lalita Subramanian; Jennifer Harder; Wenjun Ju; Viji Nair; Maria Larkina; Abhijit S Naik; Jinghui Luo; Sanjay Jain; Rachel Sealfon; Olga Troyanskaya; Nir Hacohen; Jeffrey B Hodgin; Matthias Kretzler; Kidney Precision Medicine Project Kpmp Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2020-03-26
Authors: Amin Abedini; Yuan O Zhu; Shatakshee Chatterjee; Gabor Halasz; Kishor Devalaraja-Narashimha; Rojesh Shrestha; Michael S Balzer; Jihwan Park; Tong Zhou; Ziyuan Ma; Katie Marie Sullivan; Hailong Hu; Xin Sheng; Hongbo Liu; Yi Wei; Carine M Boustany-Kari; Uptal Patel; Salem Almaani; Matthew Palmer; Raymond Townsend; Shira Blady; Jonathan Hogan; Lori Morton; Katalin Susztak Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Ricardo Melo Ferreira; Angela R Sabo; Seth Winfree; Kimberly S Collins; Danielle Janosevic; Connor J Gulbronson; Ying-Hua Cheng; Lauren Casbon; Daria Barwinska; Michael J Ferkowicz; Xiaoling Xuei; Chi Zhang; Kenneth W Dunn; Katherine J Kelly; Timothy A Sutton; Takashi Hato; Pierre C Dagher; Tarek M El-Achkar; Michael T Eadon Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2021-06-22