| Literature DB >> 31818000 |
Xiaoxue Wu, Xuemin Gao, Xuan Zhu1, Shuyi Zhang2, Xinmei Liu, Huayu Yang, Hua Song, Qing Chen.
Abstract
Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson is a popular Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) with a variety of bioactivities. However, there are some problems that have affected the development of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson. At present, many methods have been reported for the analysis of coumarins in Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson. However, the quality control of coumarins in Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson by high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC) has not been reported. In this study, analytical high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC) was successfully used for fingerprint of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson with a two-phase solvent system composed of n-hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water at 4:6:6.5:3.5 (v/v). The UV wavelength was set at 254 nm. Six coumarin compounds with high biological activity were selected as indicator compounds for the quality control. The HSCCC fingerprint of the Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson was successfully established and there were some differences according to the results of the fingerprint analysis. The present results demonstrate that HSCCC is an established and efficient technique for the fingerprint analysis of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson and can be used to control the quality of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson. In brief, HSCCC is a useful technology for the fingerprint analytical method for TCM.Entities:
Keywords: Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson; fingerprint; high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC); quality control; traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31818000 PMCID: PMC6969901 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24244496
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The structure of coumarin compounds of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson. 1, osthole; 2, xanthotoxin; 3, isopimpinellin; 4, bergapten; 5, imperatorin.
Effects of different extraction methods on the content of osthole and imperatorin in the total coumarins of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson (n = 3).
| Extraction Method | Content (mg*g−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Osthole | Imperatorin | Total | |
| Ethanol leaching | 22.22 | 9.85 | 32.06 |
| Decoction extraction | 3.19 | 0.56 | 3.75 |
| Ethanol ultrasonic extraction | 26.38 | 9.56 | 35.95 |
L9 (33) orthogonal test design and the concentrations of osthole and imperatorin (n = 3).
| Test Number | A | B | C | (1) | (2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.78 | 0.91 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2.84 | 3.47 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3.01 | 5.61 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4.83 | 6.94 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3.15 | 5.18 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 6.49 | 6.33 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3.23 | 4.50 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3.08 | 3.73 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.40 | 4.62 |
K-value and R-value at different conditions.
| A | B | C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.88 | 3.61 | 4.12 | |
| 4.82 | 3.02 | 3.69 | |
| 3.24 | 4.30 | 3.13 | |
| 1.95 | 1.28 | 0.99 | |
| 3.33 | 5.12 | 3.68 | |
| 7.15 | 4.13 | 6.01 | |
| 4.28 | 5.52 | 5.10 | |
| 3.82 | 1.39 | 2.35 |
Ki: the sum of the test results corresponding to the horizontal number i on any column. R: KMax—KMin.
Figure 2(A) HSCCC chromatogram of standard compounds. (B) HSCCC chromatogram of the crude sample of Cnidium monnieri (L) Cusson. 1: xanthotoxin 2: isopimpinellin 3: bergapten 4: imperatorin 5: osthole. Condition: Solvent system: n-hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water: 4:6:6.5:3.5; speed: 1300 rpm; injection volume: 3 mg; flow rate: 1.0 mL/min.
Partition coefficient (K) of the target compounds measured in different solvent systems.
| Solvent Systems ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1.52 | 0.57 | 1.09 | 1.62 | 4.63 | 7.17 | |
| 0.94 | 0.37 | 0.59 | 0.86 | 2.06 | 3.19 | |
| 0.87 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 0.45 | 1.07 | 1.78 | |
| 0.63 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.30 | 0.93 | 1.90 | |
| 0.92 | 0.67 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 1.49 | 1.99 | |
The reproducibility, precision, and stability of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson.
| Compound | Reproducibility | Precision | Stability |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSD (%) | RSD (%) | RSD (%) | |
| 1 | 2.25 | 1.75 | 1.87 |
| 2 | 1.46 | 2.74 | 2.47 |
| 3 | 2.61 | 2.42 | 2.01 |
| 4 | 2.63 | 2.46 | 3.00 |
| 5 | 2.45 | 2.50 | 2.77 |
| 6 | 2.61 | 2.84 | 2.13 |
Relative peak areas of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson.
| Number of Peaks | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 1 | 0.47 |
| S2 | 0.70 | 0.09 | 0.28 | 0.11 | 1 | 0.54 |
| S3 | 0.40 | 1.05 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 1 | 0.59 |
| S4 | 0.24 | 0.67 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 1 | 0.57 |
| S5 | 0.83 | 0.70 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.54 |
| S6 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.28 | 0.16 | 1 | 0.49 |
| S7 | 0.66 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.10 | 1 | 0.48 |
| S8 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.34 | 0.11 | 1 | 0.63 |
| S9 | 0.58 | 0.21 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 1 | 0.58 |
| S10 | 0.36 | 0.56 | 0.32 | 0.16 | 1 | 0.44 |
| S11 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 1 | 0.51 |
| S12 | 0.81 | 0.43 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.58 |
| S13 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 1 | 0.56 |
| S14 | 0.37 | 0.54 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 1 | 0.65 |
| S15 | 0.43 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 1 | 0.62 |
| S16 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 1 | 0.53 |
| S17 | 0.44 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.58 |
| S18 | 0.82 | 0.22 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 1 | 0.44 |
| S19 | 0.34 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.13 | 1 | 0.67 |
| S20 | 0.75 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.13 | 1 | 0.54 |
Figure 3The fingerprint of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson. S1–S20 are the fingerprints of 20 batches.
Figure 4Fitting curve of the fingerprint of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson. 1: xanthotoxin 2: isopimpinellin 3: bergapten 4: imperatorin 5: osthole. Condition: Solvent system: n-hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water: 4:6:6.5:3.5; speed: 1300 rpm; injection volume: 3 mg; flow rate: 1.0 mL/min.
The similarity of 20 batches of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson.
| Number | Similarity |
|---|---|
| S1 | 0.9 |
| S2 | 0.86 |
| S3 | 0.93 |
| S4 | 0.92 |
| S5 | 0.89 |
| S6 | 0.93 |
| S7 | 0.91 |
| S8 | 0.92 |
| S9 | 0.9 |
| S10 | 0.93 |
| S11 | 0.92 |
| S12 | 0.88 |
| S13 | 0.91 |
| S14 | 0.95 |
| S15 | 0.91 |
| S16 | 0.9 |
| S17 | 0.88 |
| S18 | 0.83 |
| S19 | 0.88 |
| S20 | 0.84 |
Figure 5High-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC) chromatogram of Cnidium monnieri (L) Cusson, Apium graveoleus L.var.dulce DC and Lappula myosotis V. Wolf. A: Cnidium monnieri (L) Cusson; B: Lappula myosotis V. Wolf; C: Apium graveoleus L.var.dulce DC.
Sources and batch numbers of 20 batches of Cnidium monnieri (L.) Cusson.
| Number | Source | Batch Number |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jiangsu | 170,801 |
| 2 | Anhui | 170,524 |
| 3 | Anhui | 170,828 |
| 4 | Anhui | 161,109 |
| 5 | Anhui | 160,524 |
| 6 | Zhejiang | 150,810 |
| 7 | Zhejiang | 170,810 |
| 8 | Zhejiang | 160,910 |
| 9 | Zhejiang | 171,211 |
| 10 | Hebei | 170410 |
| 11 | Hebei | 160,805 |
| 12 | Hebei | 160,701 |
| 13 | Hebei | 140,301 |
| 14 | Hebei | 170,910 |
| 15 | Hunan | 170,309 |
| 16 | Guangxi | 170,807 |
| 17 | Guangxi | 170,410 |
| 18 | Hubei | 150,410 |
| 19 | Jiangxi | 171,105 |
| 20 | Shangdong | 171,112 |
Factor table of ultrasonic extraction conditions.
| Factor Level | A/% | B/mL | C/min |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | 20 | 20 |
| 2 | 75 | 30 | 40 |
| 3 | 95 | 40 | 60 |