| Literature DB >> 31817626 |
Ting Zhang1,2, Hui Ni1,2,3,4, Xu-Jian Qiu2,3,4, Ting Li2, Liang-Zhen Zhang2, Li-Jun Li2,3,4, Ze-Dong Jiang2,3,4, Qing-Biao Li2,3,4, Feng Chen1,2,5, Fu-Ping Zheng1.
Abstract
The unpleasant stale note is a negative factor hindering the consumption of instant ripened Pu-erh tea products. This study focused on investigating volatile chemicals in instant ripened Pu-erh tea that could mask the stale note via sensory evaluation, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) analyses. GC-MS and GC-O analyses showed that linalool, linalool oxides, trans-β-ionone, benzeneacetaldehyde, and methoxybenzenes were the major aroma contributors to the simultaneous distillation and extraction (SDE) extract of instant ripened Pu-erh tea. Sensory evaluation showed that the SDE extract had a strong stale note, which was due to methoxybenzenes. By investigating suppressive interaction among flavour components, the stale note from methoxybenzenes was shown to have reciprocal masking interactions with sweet, floral, and green notes. Moreover, the validation experiment showed that the addition of 40 μg/mL of trans-β-ionone in the instant ripened Pu-erh tea completely masked the stale note and improved the overall aromatic acceptance. These results elucidate the volatile chemicals that could mask the stale note of instant ripened Pu-erh tea products, which might help to develop high quality products made from instant ripened Pu-erh tea.Entities:
Keywords: instant ripened Pu-erh tea; masking; sensory evaluation; stale note; suppressive interaction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31817626 PMCID: PMC6943613 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24244473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1A radar map of sensory evaluation in the instant ripened Pu-erh tea.
Identification and quantitative analysis of the volatiles from instant ripened Pu-erh tea.
| No. | Volatiles | Rtx-5MS | Characteristic Ion Fragment | Std c | Calibration Equation d | Range (μg/mL) |
| CF e | Concentration (μg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a RI1 | b RI2 | |||||||||
| Aldehydes | ||||||||||
| 1 | Benzeneacetaldehyde | 1045 | 1045 | 91 92 120 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9995 | 0.719 | 0.83 ± 0.04 | |
| 2 | Safranal | 1203 | 1203 | 107 91 121 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9991 | 0.504 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | |
| 3 | 1-ethyl-1 | 1051 | 1052 | 39 94 123 | MS | c | - | - | - | 0.70 ± 0.01 |
| Alcohols | ||||||||||
| 4 | Benzyl alcohol | 1037 | 1037 | 108 79 107 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9970 | 0.541 | 2.16 ± 0.0.11 | |
| 5 | Linalool oxide I | 1074 | 1074 | 59 94 43 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9997 | 0.233 | 0.67 ± 0.01 | |
| 6 | Linalool oxide II | 1090 | 1088 | 59 43 94 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9997 | 0.354 | 0.79 ± 0.01 | |
| 7 | Linalool | 1102 | 1101 | 71 41 93 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9996 | 0.719 | 1.44 ± 0.03 | |
| 8 | Hotrienol | 1107 | 1104 | 71 82 152 | MS | c | - | - | - | 0.27 ± 0.01 |
| 9 | 3-Octen-2-ol | 1110 | 1114 | 43 71 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9991 | 0.277 | 0.73 ± 0.01 | |
| 10 | Phenylethyl alcohol | 1116 | 1116 | 91 92 122 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9995 | 0.132 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | |
| 11 | Linalool oxide III * | 1172 | 1173 | 43 94 67 | MS | 0.025–5 | 0.9997 | 0.354 | 1.55 ± 0.03 | |
| 12 | Menthol | 1176 | 1178 | 71 81 95 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9996 | 4.122 | 2.00 ± 0.17 | |
| 13 | Linalool oxide IV * | 1178 | 1175 | 43 94 67 | MS | 0.025–5 | 0.9997 | 0.354 | 4.58 ± 0.04 | |
| 14 | α-Terpineol | 1193 | 1195 | 59 93 121 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9994 | 0.808 | 1.17 ± 0.01 | |
| 15 | Nerol | 1232 | 1232 | 69 41 93 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9992 | 0.413 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | |
| 16 | Syringol | 1249 | 1239 | 93 139 154 | MS | c | - | - | - | 0.59 ± 0.02 |
| 17 | Geraniol | 1259 | 1259 | 69 41 68 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9994 | 0.603 | 0.78 ± 0.02 | |
| 18 | 2,4-Ditert-butylphenol | 1518 | 1513 | 191 57 206 | MS, Std | 0.005–5 | 0.9998 | 0.057 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | |
| Ketones | ||||||||||
| 19 | 2-Hexanone | - | 792 | 43 58 57 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9990 | 0.264 | 0.94 ± 0.04 | |
| 20 | 4-Oxoisophorone | 1146 | 1147 | 68 96 102 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9996 | 1.759 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | |
| 21 | 1491 | 1490 | 177 43 41 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9995 | 0.129 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | ||
| Esters | ||||||||||
| 22 | Methyl salicylate | 1197 | 1197 | 39 92 120 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9990 | 2.416 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | |
| 23 | Dihydroactinidiolide | 1538 | 1538 | 111 43 137 | MS, Std | 20–500 | 0.9969 | 2.210 | 188.04 ± 3.35 | |
| Methoxybenzenes | ||||||||||
| 24 | 1,2-Dimethoxybenzene | 1151 | 1149 | 138 95 123 | MS, Std | 5–35 | 0.9976 | 0.430 | 15.54 ± 0.23 | |
| 25 | 3,4-Dimethoxytoluene | 1243 | 1246 | 152 137 109 | MS, Std | 0.05–10 | 0.9969 | 0.533 | 6.49 ± 0.06 | |
| 26 | 1,2,3-Trimethoxybenzene | 1321 | 1315 | 117 90 89 | MS, Std | 20–500 | 0.9997 | 7.774 | 260.53 ± 3.92 | |
| 27 | 1,2,4-Trimethoxybenzene | 1378 | 1378 | 168 103 110 | MS, Std | 5–35 | 1.0000 | 0.441 | 4.86 ± 0.12 | |
| 28 | 1,2,3-Trimethoxy-5-methyl-benzene * | 1410 | 1410 | 168 103 125 | MS | 5–35 | 1.0000 | 0.441 | 5.32 ± 0.09 | |
| 29 | 1,2,3,4-Tetramethoxybenzene | 1453 | 1449 | 97 140 198 | MS | c | - | - | - | 2.10 ± 0.06 |
| Others | MS | |||||||||
| 30 | 1-Ethylpyrrole | 815 | 815 | 80 95 67 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9996 | 0.990 | 0.40 ± 0.01 | |
| 31 | Indole | 1299 | 1300 | 117 90 89 | MS, Std | 0.025–5 | 0.9994 | 0.221 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | |
| 32 | < | - | 1962 | 73 256 | MS | c | - | - | - | 7.20 ± 0.08 |
a RI1 was obtained by GC-MS analysis using the Rtx-5MS column. b RI2 was reported in the database on the web (http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/) and was analyzed using a column similar to Rtx-5MS. c Std indicates that the identification was confirmed by matching a standard. d All of the equations of the calibration curves of authentic standard chemicals (ASCs) were calculated in the SIM mode, where X is the ratio of the concentration of the ASC to that of the internal standard (IS) and Y is the ratio of the peak area of the ASC to that of the IS and the concentrations of volatiles that currently lack standards were estimated using the calibration curve of the internal reference of cyclohexanone in the scan mode. e CF represents correction factors using this formula: CF = (As/Ms)/(Ar/Mr), As represents the corresponding quantitative ion (SIM mode) area of the IS, Ar represents the corresponding quantitative ion (SIM mode) area of the ASC, Ms represents the concentration of IS, Mr represents the concentration of the ASC. * represents that the standard curve of linalool oxide II is used to quantify linalool oxide III and linalool oxide IV; the standard curve of 1,2,4-trimethoxybenzene is used to quantify 1,2,3-trimethoxy-5-methyl-benzene.
Odor descriptions, flavor dilution factors (FD), and aroma intensity of the aroma-active compounds.
| No. | a RI3 | b RI4 | Volatiles | Odor Description | FD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aldehydes | |||||
| 1 | 1655 | 1650 | Benzeneacetaldehyde | Green | 16 |
| 2 | 1204 | 1203 | Safranal | Green | 1 |
| 3 | 1619 | 1616 | 1-ethyl-1 | Green | 4 |
| Alcohols | |||||
| 4 | 1878 | 1877 | Benzyl alcohol | Sweet *, roasted | 4 |
| 5 | 1439 | 1435 | Linalool oxide I | Sweet | 4 |
| 6 | 1468 | 1470 | Linalool oxide II | Sweet | 16 |
| 7 | 1543 | 1549 | Linalool | Floral | 16 |
| 8 | 1915 | 1919 | Phenylethyl alcohol | Floral | 4 |
| 9 | 1753 | 1750 | Linalool oxide III | Sweet | 16 |
| 10 | 1636 | 1632 | Menthol | Green | 1 |
| 11 | 1780 | 1775 | Linalool oxide IV | Sweet | 16 |
| 12 | 1718 | 1715 | Wood | 4 | |
| 13 | - | 2321 | 2,4-Ditert-butylphenol | Green | 1 |
| Ketones | |||||
| 14 | 1105 | 1102 | 2-Hexanone | Fruity, floral | 1 |
| 15 | 1955 | 1954 | Floral | 16 | |
| Esters | |||||
| 16 | 1763 | 1759 | Methyl salicylate | Sweet | 1 |
| Methoxybenzenes | |||||
| 17 | 1731 | 1731 | 1,2-Dimethoxybenzene | Stale | 4 |
| 18 | 1807 | 1806 | 3,4-Dimethoxytoluene | Stale | 1 |
| 19 | 1961 | 1955 | 1,2,3-Trimethoxybenzene | Stale | 16 |
| 20 | - | 2094 | 1,2,4-Trimethoxybenzene | Stale | 16 |
| 21 | - | 2041 | 1,2,3-Trimethoxy-5-methyl-benzene | Stale | 16 |
| 22 | - | 2321 | 1,2,3,4-Tetramethoxybenzene | Green | 4 |
| Others | |||||
| 23 | 1179 | 1178 | 1-Ethylpyrrole | Roasted | 4 |
| 24 | - | 2435 | Indole | Floral | 4 |
a RI3 was obtained by GC-O analysis using a HP-INNOWax column. b RI4 was reported in the database on the web (http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/) and was analyzed by GC-MS analysis using a column similar to HP-INNOWax column. “*” is the main smell of olfactometry among a number of odors.
Figure 2Masking test of the stale note interacting with the sweet note from linalool oxides (A), floral notes from linalool, trans-β-ionone, phenylethyl alcohol, and indole (B) and green note from benzeneacetaldehyde (C) in the instant ripened Pu-erh tea. Same aromas with different superscripts (i.e., a, b, c) have significant differences from the results (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Curves of aroma intensity/score of stale and floral notes and overall acceptance with the addition of trans-β-ionone in the instant ripened Pu-erh tea infusion. Same aromas with different superscripts (i.e., a, b, c, d, e) have significant differences from the results (p < 0.05).
Sensory evaluation criteria for instant ripened Pu-erh tea.
| Aroma Characteristic | Standard Solution | Concentration for Aroma Intensity of 0 Scores (μL/L) | Concentration for Aroma Intensity of 9 Scores (μL/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green | Benzeneacetaldehyde | 100 | 900 |
| Floral | Linalool | 20 | 180 |
| Sweet | Linalool oxide | 10 | 90 |
| Roasted | 2-Ethyl-3-methylpyrazine | 130 | 1170 |
| Stale | 1,2,4-Trimethoxybenzene | 1147 | 10323 |
Suppressive interaction model of aroma compounds.
| Samples | Aroma Description | Compound Composition and Concentration |
|---|---|---|
| Sample 1# | Stale | Mixture of 15.54 μg/mL of 1,2-dimethoxybenzene, 260.53 μg/mL of 1,2,3-trimethoxybenzene and 4.86 μg/mL of 1,2,4-trimethoxybenzene |
| Sample 2# | Sweet | Mixture of 0.67 μg/mL of linalool oxide I and 0.79 μg/mL of linalool oxide II |
| Sample 3# | Stale + sweet | Mixture of samples 1# and samples 2# |
| Sample 4# | Floral | Mixture of 1.44 μg/mL of linalool, 0.16 μg/mL of |
| Sample 5# | Stale + floral | Mixture of samples 1# and samples 4# |
| Sample 6# | Green | Mixture of 0.83 μg/mL of benzeneacetaldehyde |
| Sample 7# | Stale + green | Mixture of samples 1# and samples 6# |