| Literature DB >> 31817454 |
Edina Szabó1, Balázs Démuth1, Dorián László Galata1, Panna Vass1, Edit Hirsch1, István Csontos1, György Marosi1, Zsombor K Nagy1.
Abstract
Preparation and formulation of amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) are becoming more and more popular in the pharmaceutical field because the dissolution of poorly water-soluble drugs can be effectively improved this way, which can lead to increased bioavailability in many cases. During downstream processing of ASDs, technologists need to keep in mind both traditional challenges and the newest trends. In the last decade, the pharmaceutical industry began to display considerable interest in continuous processing, which can be explained with their potential advantages such as smaller footprint, easier scale-up, and more consistent product, better quality and quality assurance. Continuous downstream processing of drug-loaded ASDs opens new ways for automatic operation. Therefore, the formulation of poorly water-soluble drugs may be more effective and safe. However, developments can be challenging due to the poor flowability and feeding properties of ASDs. Consequently, this review pays special attention to these characteristics since the feeding of the components greatly influences the content uniformity in the final dosage form. The main purpose of this paper is to summarize the most important steps of the possible ASD-based continuous downstream processes in order to give a clear overview of current course lines and future perspectives.Entities:
Keywords: amorphous solid dispersions; continuous manufacturing; feeding; formulation; powder characterization
Year: 2019 PMID: 31817454 PMCID: PMC6955740 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11120654
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Advantages of drug-loaded polymer-based amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs).
Figure 2Schematic design of a possible electrospinning-based continuous formulation system [70].
Figure 3Flowchart of possible continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing routes for preparing ASD-loaded tablets.
The potential impact of powder properties on flow.
| Property | Impact | Measuring | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Particle size and shape distribution | Flowability increases with increase in particle size; | Sieve tower; | [ |
| Bulk density | Hausner ratio and Carr’s index can be determined based on bulk and tapped densities; | Tapping machine; | [ |
| Surface area | With increasing specific surface area, the flowability decreases in general | Pycnometer; | [ |
| Surface energy | Increased surface energy leads to poor flowability | Inverse gas chromatography for separation and mass spectrometry for detection | [ |
| Flow | Higher flow rate indicates higher flowability | Flow through an orifice | [ |
| Cohesiveness | High cohesiveness allows the powder bed to be compressed easily and the flowability is poor; | Powder rheometer; | [ |
| Internal and wall friction | Effective angle of internal friction influences many aspects related to flow behavior, e.g., risk of arching and risk of segregation due to unwanted flow patterns; | Shear cells | [ |
| Static charge | Static charge compromises the free-flowing of the powders | Charging device; | [ |
| Hygroscopicity | Lower hygroscopicity results in better flowability | Dynamic vapor sorption; | [ |
Figure 4Main influencing factors of polymer-based ASDs’ flowability.
Figure 5Effects of process parameters on the particle size of the product (red bold labels indicate the influencing factors.).
Application opportunities of Coperion K-Tron feeders [106].
| Feeder Type | Powders |
|---|---|
| Loss-in-Weight Belt Feeders | Fragile products; |
| Vibratory Feeders | Fragile ingredients; |
| Bulk Solids Pump Feeders | Free-flowing pellets; |
| Twin Screw Feeders | Sticky, bridging or flooding powders; |
| Single Screw Feeders | Pellets; |
| Smart Weight Belt Feeders | Large volume of powders with different flow characteristics |
Figure 6Schematic design of a possible loss-in-weight feeder setup with different operation modes.