| Literature DB >> 31817374 |
Zhonghao Sun1, Huolin Huang1, Nan Sun1, Pengcheng Tao1, Cezhou Zhao2, Yung C Liang3.
Abstract
A novel structure scheme by transposing the gate channel orientation from a long horizontal one to a short vertical one is proposed and verified by technology computer-aided design (TCAD) simulations to achieve GaN-based normally-off high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) with reduced on-resistance and improved threshold voltage. The proposed devices exhibit high threshold voltage of 3.1 V, high peak transconductance of 213 mS, and much lower on-resistance of 0.53 mΩ·cm2 while displaying better off-state characteristics owing to more uniform electric field distribution around the recessed gate edge in comparison to the conventional lateral HEMTs. The proposed scheme provides a new technical approach to realize high-performance normally-off HEMTs.Entities:
Keywords: gallium nitride; high electron mobility transistors; normally-off operation; vertical gate structure; wide-bandgap semiconductor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31817374 PMCID: PMC6952818 DOI: 10.3390/mi10120848
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Cross-sectional schematics of (a) the lateral gate-recessed-high electron mobility transistors (LG-HEMT) and (b) the vertical gate HEMT (VG-HEMT).
Figure 2(a) Schematic and (b) microscopy image of the fabricated normally-on AlGaN/GaN HEMTs, and (c) comparisons of output I–V characteristics of the devices for physical parameter calibration.
Physical parameters used in technology computer-aided design (TCAD) simulations after calibration [3].
| Physical Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| Electron effective mass in GaN | 0.22· |
| Electron affinity | 3.4 eV |
| Relative dielectric constant in GaN | 9.7 |
| Background electron concentration in i-GaN layer | 5.0 × 1015 cm−3 |
| Electron mobility in 2DEG channel | 1500 cm2/(V·s) |
| 2DEG sheet density | 8.0 × 1012 cm−2 |
| Electron saturation velocity in GaN | 1.8 × 107 cm/s |
Figure 3Comparisons of (a) transfer characteristics, (b) output ID–VD curves, and (c) off-state breakdown characteristics between the LG-HEMT and VG-HEMT devices, and (d) performance comparisons among the reported normally-off HEMTs including the VG-HEMT in this work (the red star).
Figure 4(a) Energy band and (b) electron concentration diagrams along the horizontal direction across the gate channel (“y-cut” marked in the inset). (c) ID–VD curves affected by different δ values using Lombardi model in the VG-HEMT. (d) Dependences of saturated current density and Ron on δ values.
Figure 5Comparisons of (a) electrostatic potential and (b) electric field distribution profiles between the LG-HEMT and VG-HEMT devices. The data plots in (c) and (d) are derived along the two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) channel within 5 nm near the gate toward the drain side.