| Literature DB >> 31817269 |
Benjamad Khonkhaeng1, Anusorn Cherdthong1.
Abstract
This objective is to elucidate the effect of purple field corn stover treated with Pleurotus ostreatus and Volvarialla volvacea on feed utilization, ruminal ecology, and CH4 synthesis in tropical beef cattle. Four male Thai native beef cattle (100 ± 30 kg of body weight (BW) were assigned randomly as a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement in a 4 × 4 Latin square design. Factor A (roughage sources) was rice straw and purple field corn stover and factor B was species of white-rot fungi (P. ostreatus and V. volvacea). After fermentation, crude protein (CP) was increased in rice straw and purple field corn stover fermented with P. ostreatus and V. volvacea. The unfermented purple field corn stover contained 11.8% dry matter (DM) of monomeric anthocyanin (MAC), whereas the MAC concentration decreased when purple field corn stover was fermented with white rot fungi. There were no changes (p > 0.05) in DM intake of body weight (BW) kg/d and g/kg BW0.75 among the four treatments. The organic matter (OM), CP, and acid detergent fiber (ADF) intake were different between rice straw and purple field corn stover and were the greatest in the purple field corn stover group. Moreover, the current study showed that neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and ADF digestion was higher in purple field corn stover than in rice straw, but there were no significant differences between P. ostreatus and V. volvacea. There were significant effects of roughage sources on ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) at 4 h after feeding. Bacterial population was changed by feeding with purple field corn stover fermented with P. ostreatus and V. volvacea. On the other hand, the number of protozoa was reduced by approximately 33% at 4 h after feeding with purple field corn stover (p < 0.01). Propionic acid concentration was different between roughage sources (p < 0.01) enhanced with purple field corn stover fermented with P. ostreatus and V. volvacea. In addition, methane production decreased by 15% with purple field corn stover fermented with P. ostreatus and V. volvacea compared to rice straw. There were significant differences on all nitrogen balances parameters (p < 0.05), except the fecal N excretion (p > 0.05) were not changed. Furthermore, microbial crude protein and efficiency of microbial N synthesis were enhanced when purple field corn stover fermented with P. ostreatus and V. volvacea was fed compared to rice straw group. Base on this study, it could be summarized that P. ostreatus or V. volvacea can enhance the quality of purple field corn stover and modulate rumen fermentation and feed digestion in Thai native beef cattle.Entities:
Keywords: anthocyanin; feeding; roughage; ruminant; white-rot fungi
Year: 2019 PMID: 31817269 PMCID: PMC6941118 DOI: 10.3390/ani9121084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Ingredient and chemical composition and plant secondary metabolites of concentrate, rice straw (RS) and purple field corn stover (PPCS) used in the experiment.
| Parameters | Concentrate | Before fermented | After fermented | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS | PPCS | RS | PPCS | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Ingredients, (%DM) | |||||||
| Cassava chip | 55.00 | ||||||
| Rice bran | 11.00 | ||||||
| Palm kernel meal, solvent | 13.50 | ||||||
| Coconut kernel meal, solvent | 12.90 | ||||||
| Molasses, liquid | 2.00 | ||||||
| Urea | 2.60 | ||||||
| Pure sulfur | 1.00 | ||||||
| Mineral premix * | 1.00 | ||||||
| Salt | 1.00 | ||||||
| Chemical composition | |||||||
| Dry matter, % | 87.40 | 90.10 | 94.40 | 55.80 | 56.23 | 55.65 | 56.14 |
| Organic matter, %DM | 94.70 | 91.80 | 96.50 | 91.80 | 91.50 | 95.39 | 94.74 |
| Neutral detergent fiber, %DM | 12.20 | 65.40 | 70.60 | 61.97 | 61.32 | 67.60 | 64.45 |
| Acid detergent fiber, %DM | 8.40 | 40.20 | 53.20 | 37.57 | 37.22 | 42.37 | 43.87 |
| Crude protein, %DM | 14.20 | 2.60 | 4.90 | 6.95 | 7.38 | 9.47 | 9.56 |
| Plant secondary metabolites | |||||||
| Anthocyanin, %DM | - | - | 11.8 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 6.25 | 5.76 |
| Lovastatin, g/kg | - | - | - | 33.92 | 33.96 | 32.49 | 34.90 |
* Minerals and vitamins (each kg contains): Vitamin A: 10,000,000 IU; Vitamin E: 70,000 IU; Vitamin D: 1,600,000 IU; Fe: 50 g; Zn: 40 g; Mn: 40 g; Co: 0.1 g; Cu: 10 g; Se: 0.1 g; I: 0.5 g. * RS = rice straw; PPCS = purple field corn stover. Anthocyanin content (cyanidin-3-glucoside equivalents, mg/L) = (A × MW × DF × 103)/(ε × 1); where A = (A510 nm–A700 nm)pH1.0–(A510 nm–A700 nm)pH 4.5; MW (molecular weight) = 449.2 g/mol for cyanidin-3-glucoside (cyd-3-glu); DF = dilution factor; 1 = pathlength in cm., ε = 26,900 molar extinction coefficient, in L·mol−1·cm−1, for cyd-3-glu and 103 = factor for conversion from g to mg.
Feed intake and digestibility of cattle feeding rice straw (RS) and purple field corn stove (PPCS) fermented with Pleurotus ostreatus and Volvariella volvacea.
| Parameters | RS | PPCS | SEM | Contrast | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| R | WRF | R × WRF | ||
| DM intake | ||||||||
| Roughage | ||||||||
| kg/d | 3.54 | 3.39 | 3.23 | 3.80 | 0.18 | 0.80 | 0.30 | 0.08 |
| g/kg BW0.75 | 87.69 | 83.52 | 79.27 | 92.12 | 5.44 | 0.98 | 0.44 | 0.14 |
| Concentrate | ||||||||
| kg/d | 1.39 | 1.40 | 1.41 | 1.43 | 0.04 | 0.56 | 0.79 | 0.95 |
| g/kg BW0.75 | 34.32 | 34.38 | 34.48 | 34.57 | 0.27 | 0.55 | 0.79 | 0.95 |
| Total | ||||||||
| kg/d | 4.93 | 4.79 | 4.65 | 5.23 | 0.18 | 0.69 | 0.27 | 0.07 |
| g/kg BW0.75 | 122.01 | 117.91 | 113.75 | 126.69 | 5.31 | 0.96 | 0.42 | 0.13 |
| Nutrients intake, kg/d | ||||||||
| Dry matter | 4.93 | 4.79 | 4.65 | 5.23 | 0.18 | 0.69 | 0.27 | 0.07 |
| Organic matter | 4.55 a | 4.21 a | 4.73 b | 4.90 b | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.64 | 0.17 |
| Crude protein | 0.39 a | 0.38 a | 0.49 b | 0.51 b | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.75 | 0.52 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 2.91 | 2.65 | 3.14 | 3.13 | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.53 | 0.56 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 1.82 a | 1.66 a | 2.01 b | 2.13 b | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.91 | 0.33 |
| Digestibility coefficients, % | ||||||||
| Dry matter | 60.54 a | 60.20 a | 64.85 b | 65.16 b | 0.36 | <0.01 | 0.96 | 0.39 |
| Organic matter | 64.96 a | 63.43 a | 67.93 b | 67.78 b | 0.99 | <0.01 | 0.41 | 0.50 |
| Crude protein | 62.55 a | 61.23 a | 65.21 b | 65.36 b | 0.88 | <0.01 | 0.52 | 0.42 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 41.43 a | 42.42 a | 47.81 b | 46.56 b | 0.80 | <0.01 | 0.73 | 0.25 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 37.24 a | 35.94 a | 41.73 b | 41.72 b | 0.91 | <0.01 | 0.74 | 0.29 |
* RS = rice straw; PPCS = purple field corn stover; R = roughage; WRF = white rot fungi; R × WRF = interaction between roughage and white rot fungi; SEM, standard error of the mean. a,b Means differing letters across rows indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ruminal ecology, ammonia nitrogen, microorganism, volatile fatty acid profile, and methane estimation of cattle feeding rice straw and purple field corn stove treated Pleurotus ostreatus and Volvariella volvacea.
| Parameters | RS | PPCS | SEM | Contrast | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| R | WRF | R × WRF | ||
| Rumen ecology | ||||||||
| Ruminal temperature, °C | ||||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 38.30 | 38.47 | 38.55 | 38.12 | 0.26 | 0.85 | 0.63 | 0.28 |
| 4 h post feeding | 39.33 | 39.36 | 39.26 | 38.86 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.52 | 0.46 |
| Mean | 38.82 | 38.91 | 38.91 | 38.49 | 0.24 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.32 |
| Ruminal pH | ||||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 7.08 | 7.19 | 7.12 | 6.97 | 0.18 | 0.63 | 0.91 | 0.51 |
| 4 h post feeding | 7.06 | 7.06 | 6.95 | 6.52 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Mean | 6.95 | 7.00 | 7.04 | 6.75 | 0.28 | 0.58 | 0.43 | 0.26 |
| Ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration, mg/dL | ||||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 12.95 | 12.60 | 14.36 | 14.36 | 1.51 | 0.31 | 0.91 | 0.91 |
| 4 h post feeding | 14.71 a | 14.51 a | 16.75 b | 17.60 b | 0.28 | <0.01 | 0.27 | 0.08 |
| Mean | 14.53 | 14.43 | 14.85 | 15.11 | 0.80 | 0.54 | 0.92 | 0.83 |
| Volatile fatty acid profile, mol/100 mol | ||||||||
| Acetic acid | ||||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 53.52 | 53.51 | 55.14 | 56.63 | 2.70 | 0.39 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
| 4 h post feeding | 55.44 a | 55.17 a | 58.70 b | 62.19 b | 2.14 | 0.03 | 0.46 | 0.39 |
| Mean | 54.48 | 54.59 | 56.85 | 54.59 | 2.04 | 0.10 | 0.57 | 0.57 |
| Propionic acid | ||||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 28.51 a | 28.99 a | 33.66 b | 32.09 b | 1.51 | 0.03 | 0.72 | 0.51 |
| 4 h post feeding | 32.59 a | 32.26 a | 36.37 b | 35.47 b | 1.48 | 0.01 | 0.68 | 0.85 |
| Mean | 31.12 a | 30.62 a | 35.01 b | 33.78 b | 1.29 | 0.01 | 0.51 | 0.78 |
| Butyric acid | ||||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 12.26 | 11.10 | 10.14 | 11.00 | 2.00 | 0.59 | 0.94 | 0.62 |
| 4 h post feeding | 12.78 | 12.12 | 10.88 | 12.72 | 2.20 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.58 |
| Mean | 12.52 | 11.06 | 10.51 | 10.72 | 1.52 | 0.45 | 0.69 | 0.59 |
| Total VFA | ||||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 98.38 | 96.54 | 101.66 | 103.02 | 3.16 | 0.14 | 0.94 | 0.62 |
| 4 h post feeding | 96.73 a | 96.29 a | 103.99 b | 107.00 b | 1.98 | <0.01 | 0.53 | 0.40 |
| Mean | 98.57 a | 95.69 a | 101.60 b | 102.90 b | 1.81 | 0.01 | 0.66 | 0.27 |
| Blood urea nitrogen, mg/dL | ||||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 16.75 | 15.00 | 13.25 | 14.25 | 1.63 | 0.21 | 0.82 | 0.41 |
| 4 h post feeding | 18.25 | 14.00 | 16.25 | 16.50 | 1.44 | 0.86 | 0.19 | 0.14 |
| Mean | 17.50 | 14.50 | 14.75 | 15.37 | 1.18 | 0.44 | 0.33 | 0.15 |
| Methane estimation *, mM/L | ||||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 20.75 a | 21.05 a | 18.12 b | 18.72 b | 1.09 | 0.04 | 0.68 | 0.89 |
| 4 h post feeding | 23.68 a | 25.76 a | 20.04 b | 19.44 b | 1.17 | <0.01 | 0.54 | 0.27 |
| Mean | 22.21 a | 23.40 a | 19.08 b | 18.87 b | 1.09 | <0.01 | 0.66 | 0.53 |
| Microbial populations, cell/mL | ||||||||
| Bacteria, ×1010 | ||||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 4.27 a | 5.00 a | 8.25 b | 6.53 b | 1.11 | 0.04 | 0.67 | 0.31 |
| 4 h post feeding | 4.87 a | 5.15 a | 9.65 b | 8.84 b | 2.02 | 0.05 | 0.89 | 0.79 |
| Mean | 5.51 a | 5.07 a | 8.65 b | 7.82 b | 1.06 | 0.01 | 0.55 | 0.85 |
| Protozoa, ×106 | ||||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 7.20 | 5.50 | 3.00 | 4.83 | 1.58 | 0.18 | 0.91 | 0.32 |
| 4 h post feeding | 6.62 a | 4.50 a | 3.50 b | 3.96 b | 0.66 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 0.09 |
| Mean | 6.91 a | 5.00 a | 3.25 b | 3.73 b | 0.78 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 0.16 |
* RS = rice straw; PPCS = purple field corn stover; R = roughage; WRF = white rot fungi; R × WRF = interaction between roughage and white rot fungi; CH4 = (0.45 × acetic acid) − (0.275 × propionic acid) + (0.40 × butyric acid) (Moss et al., 2000). SEM, standard error of the mean. a,b Means differing letters across rows indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Nitrogen (N) balance and purine derivative of cattle feeding rice straw and purple field corn stove treated Pleurotus ostreatus and Volvariella volvacea.
| Parameters | Rice Straw | Purple corn stove | SEM | Contrast | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| R | WRF | R × WRF | ||
| N intake (NI), g/d | 62.91 a | 62.77 a | 77.93 b | 81.90 b | 3.84 | <0.01 | 0.62 | 0.60 |
| Total N excretion, g/d | 50.23 a | 51.02 a | 55.56 b | 58.23 b | 0.58 | 0.02 | 0.88 | 0.65 |
| Fecal N excretion, g/d | 15.07 | 15.31 | 16.67 | 17.47 | 1.89 | 0.18 | 0.68 | 0.44 |
| Urinary N excretion, g/d | 35.16 a | 35.71 a | 38.89 b | 40.76 b | 1.35 | 0.01 | 0.58 | 0.71 |
| N absorption, g/d | 47.84 a | 47.46 a | 61.26 b | 64.43 b | 2.36 | <0.01 | 0.83 | 0.36 |
| % of N absorption | 30.10 a | 29.79 a | 47.74 b | 52.77 b | 1.55 | 0.02 | 0.65 | 0.89 |
| N retention, g/d | 12.68 a | 11.75 a | 22.37 b | 23.67 b | 1.23 | 0.03 | 0.33 | 0.47 |
| % of N retention to N intake | 20.16 a | 18.72 a | 28.71 b | 28.90 b | 2.19 | 0.05 | 0.53 | 0.77 |
| PD, mmol/d | ||||||||
| Allantoin excretion | 80.55 | 80.27 | 88.17 | 88.15 | 0.51 | <0.01 | 0.81 | 0.84 |
| Allantoin absorption | 74.62 a | 74.27 a | 82.92 b | 82.77 b | 0.58 | <0.01 | 0.67 | 0.86 |
| Microbial crude protein, g/d | 275.11 a | 274.16 a | 301.14 b | 301.07 b | 3.97 | <0.01 | 0.73 | 0.19 |
| EMPS * | 64.16 a | 64.50 a | 68.20 b | 68.34 b | 0.92 | 0.03 | 0.34 | 0.06 |
* RS = rice straw; PPCS = purple field corn stover; R = roughage; WRF = white rot fungi; R × WRF = interaction between roughage and white rot fungi; EMPS: efficiency of microbial protein synthesis. N: Nitrogen. Microbial crude protein (g/d) = 3.99 × 0.856 × mmoles of purine derivatives excreted. Efficiency of microbial N synthesis (EMNS, g/kg of organic matter (OM) digested in the rumen (OMDR) = ((MCP (g/d) × 1000)/DOMR (g)), assuming that rumen digestion was 650 g/kg OM of digestion in total tract. SEM, standard error of the mean. a,b Means differing letters across rows indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).