| Literature DB >> 31816906 |
Elizabet Janić Hajnal1, Milan Vukić2,3, Lato Pezo4, Dejan Orčić5, Nevena Puač6, Nikola Škoro6, Ardea Milidrag7, Dragana Šoronja Simović2.
Abstract
Beside Fusarium toxins, Alternaria toxins are among the most commonly found mycotoxins in wheat and wheat products. Currently, investigations of possibilities of reduction of Alternaria toxins in the wheat-processing chain are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the potency of cold atmospheric plasma treatments, as a new non-thermal approach, for reduction of alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME) and tentoxin (TEN) content in spiked white wheat flour samples. Samples were treated with plasma generated in the air during 30 s to 180 s, with an increment step of 30 s, and at four varying distances from the cold plasma source (6 mm, 21 mm, 36 mm and 51 mm). The reduction of the Alternaria toxins content in samples after treatment was monitored by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The maximum reduction of the examined Alternaria toxins was obtained by treatment performed at 6 mm distance from the plasma source, lasting 180 s, resulting in reductions of 60.6%, 73.8% and 54.5% for AOH, AME and TEN, respectively. According to the obtained experimental results, five empirical models in the form of the second-order polynomials were developed for the prediction of AOH, AME and TEN reduction, as well as the temperature and the moisture content of the wheat flour, that gave a good fit to experimental data and were able to predict the response variables successfully. The developed second-order polynomial models showed high coefficients of determination for prediction of experimental results (between 0.918 and 0.961).Entities:
Keywords: LC-MS/MS; alternariol; alternariol monomethyl ether; atmospheric cold plasma; mathematical modelling; tentoxin; wheat flour
Year: 2019 PMID: 31816906 PMCID: PMC6950655 DOI: 10.3390/toxins11120704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1The optical emission spectra of the surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) in atmospheric-pressure air.
Figure 2(a) Dependence of VRMS and IRMS values on the voltage values set by the variable transformer; (b) Voltage-current characteristics of the SDBD plasma system. Red and blue lines are guides for the eye for easier detection for impedance change. VRMS—root-mean-square value of voltage; IRMS—root-mean-square value of current; Vr—voltage on variable transformer.
The results of cold plasma treatments on reduction of Alternaria toxins content in wheat flour.
| Trial | Input | Responses | AME (%) * | TEN (%) * | T (°C) | M (%) | SS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 30 | 21.5 | 44.6 | 30.6 | 29.0 | 14.1 | 0.420 |
| 2 | 21 | 30 | 17.0 | 37.0 | 14.4 | 27.0 | 14.1 | 0.327 |
| 3 | 36 | 30 | 8.9 | 32.2 | 13.7 | 25.7 | 14.1 | 0.287 |
| 4 | 51 | 30 | 2.4 | 22.3 | 3.6 | 24.0 | 14.1 | 0.200 |
| 5 | 6 | 60 | 29.1 | 61.3 | 37.6 | 33.2 | 13.8 | 0.539 |
| 6 | 21 | 60 | 21.8 | 49.7 | 22.7 | 27.9 | 14.1 | 0.418 |
| 7 | 36 | 60 | 12.3 | 40.5 | 16.2 | 26.9 | 14.1 | 0.332 |
| 8 | 51 | 60 | 3.0 | 32.9 | 15.4 | 25.9 | 14.1 | 0.275 |
| 9 | 6 | 90 | 32.9 | 61.5 | 38.5 | 37.4 | 13.6 | 0.546 |
| 10 | 21 | 90 | 24.2 | 51.4 | 23.2 | 30.0 | 14.0 | 0.430 |
| 11 | 36 | 90 | 12.6 | 41.8 | 22.7 | 28.7 | 14.1 | 0.350 |
| 12 | 51 | 90 | 6.3 | 35.2 | 18.5 | 27.5 | 14.0 | 0.306 |
| 13 | 6 | 120 | 33.0 | 65.0 | 48.1 | 41.6 | 13.0 | 0.632 |
| 14 | 21 | 120 | 27.5 | 55.9 | 40.7 | 32.0 | 13.8 | 0.534 |
| 15 | 36 | 120 | 16.4 | 48.8 | 39.7 | 30.5 | 14.1 | 0.443 |
| 16 | 51 | 120 | 7.7 | 38.2 | 20.7 | 29.1 | 14.0 | 0.319 |
| 17 | 6 | 150 | 35.0 | 69.2 | 50.2 | 45.9 | 12.6 | 0.675 |
| 18 | 21 | 150 | 30.5 | 56.4 | 44.1 | 34.1 | 13.8 | 0.544 |
| 19 | 36 | 150 | 16.9 | 49.7 | 40 | 32.2 | 13.9 | 0.458 |
| 20 | 51 | 150 | 9.4 | 47.4 | 29.6 | 30.8 | 13.9 | 0.394 |
| 21 | 6 | 180 | 60.7 | 73.8 | 54.5 | 50.0 | 12.3 | 0.800 |
| 22 | 21 | 180 | 47.9 | 62.7 | 48.6 | 36.0 | 13.5 | 0.664 |
| 23 | 36 | 180 | 41.1 | 57.3 | 46.4 | 34.0 | 13.5 | 0.627 |
| 24 | 51 | 180 | 28.6 | 52.7 | 31.8 | 32.5 | 13.9 | 0.476 |
| Polarity | + | + | + | − | − |
d—distance of the cold plasma source to the sample; t—time range; AOH—reduction of alternariol; AME—reduction of alternariol monomethyl ether; TEN—reduction of tentoxin; T—temperature of wheat flour sample after treatment; M—moisture of wheat flour sample after treatment; SS—standard score. Polarity—negative sign is associated with “the lower the better” criteria, while positive sign is associated with “the higher the better” criteria, as explained in Section 4.10.3. * Values are calculated (see Section 4.9).
The correlation matrix of the process responses, during the cold plasma treatments on wheat flour.
| Responses | AME | TEN | T | M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOH | 0.902 | 0.848 | 0.844 | −0.784 |
| AME | 0.933 | 0.901 | −0.792 | |
| TEN | 0.861 | −0.751 | ||
| T | −0.963 |
AOH—reduction of alternariol; AME—reduction of alternariol monomethyl ether; TEN—reduction of tentoxin; T—temperature of wheat flour sample after treatment; M—moisture of wheat flour sample after treatment. * All correlations are statistically significant at p < 0.01 level.
Figure 3Principal Component Analysis (PCA) ordination of variables based on component correlations. d—distance of the cold plasma source to the sample; t—time range; AOH—reduction of alternariol; AME—reduction of alternariol monomethyl ether; TEN—reduction of tentoxin; T—temperature of wheat flour sample after treatment; M—moisture of wheat flour sample after treatment.
ANOVA calculation of the process responses, during the cold plasma treatments on wheat flour (sum of squares are presented).
| Term | df | AOH | AME | TEN | T | M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | 2296.355 * | 1942.272 * | 1573.696 * | 370.657 * | 1.704 * |
|
| 1 | 2.385 | 17.783 | 1.845 | 73.150 * | 0.570 * |
|
| 1 | 1892.277 * | 1675.572 * | 2626.082 * | 391.053 * | 1.808 * |
|
| 1 | 344.607 * | 21.607 | 6.396 | 0.142 | 0.066 |
| 1 | 26.331 | 4.890 | 2.185 | 52.807 * | 0.890 * | |
| Error | 18 | 356.801 | 148.727 | 321.540 | 41.188 | 0.451 |
|
| 0.927 | 0.961 | 0.929 | 0.956 | 0.918 |
d—distance of the cold plasma source to the sample; t—time range; AOH—reduction of alternariol; AME—reduction of alternariol monomethyl ether; TEN—reduction of tentoxin; T—temperature of wheat flour sample after treatment; M—moisture of wheat flour sample after treatment; df—degrees of freedom; r2—coefficient of determination. * Statistically significant at p < 0.05 level.
Goodness of fit for developed models of the process responses, during the cold plasma treatments on wheat flour.
| Responses |
| RMSE | MBE | MPE |
| Skew | Kurt | Mean | StDev | Var |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOH | 18.779 | 3.856 | 0.000 | 19.474 | 0.927 | −0.756 | −0.179 | 0.000 | 3.939 | 15.513 |
| AME | 7.828 | 2.489 | 0.000 | 4.427 | 0.961 | 0.025 | −0.072 | 0.000 | 2.543 | 6.466 |
| TEN | 16.923 | 3.660 | 0.000 | 11.794 | 0.929 | −0.038 | 0.681 | 0.000 | 3.739 | 13.980 |
| T | 2.168 | 1.310 | 0.000 | 3.427 | 0.956 | −0.579 | −0.210 | 0.000 | 1.338 | 1.791 |
| M | 0.024 | 0.137 | 0.000 | 0.816 | 0.918 | 0.515 | −0.177 | 0.000 | 0.140 | 0.020 |
AOH—reduction of alternariol; AME—reduction of alternariol monomethyl ether; TEN—reduction of tentoxin; T—temperature of wheat flour sample after treatment; M—moisture of wheat flour sample after treatment; χ2—reduced chi-square; RMSE—root mean square error; MBE—mean bias error; MPE—mean percentage error; r2—coefficient of determination; Skew—skeweness; Kurt—kurtoisis; Mean—mean values of residuals; StDev—standard deviation of residuals; Var—variance of residuals.
Verification of the mathematical models of the process responses, during the cold plasma treatments on wheat flour.
| Verification | AOH (%) * | AME (%) * | TEN | T | M | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 40 | 45 | 8.370 | 32.179 | 12.858 | 24.809 | 14.200 |
| Exp. | 40 | 45 | 8.498 | 31.980 | 12.754 | 24.767 | 14.249 |
| Model | 15 | 165 | 43.825 | 65.288 | 49.448 | 40.717 | 13.098 |
| Exp. | 15 | 165 | 44.408 | 64.022 | 50.256 | 40.852 | 13.027 |
| Optimal | 6 | 180 | 55.708 | 72.484 | 56.482 | 48.106 | 12.409 |
d—distance of the cold plasma source to the sample; t—time range; AOH—reduction of alternariol; AME—reduction of alternariol monomethyl ether; TEN—reduction of tentoxin; T—temperature of wheat flour sample after treatment; M—moisture of wheat flour sample after treatment. * Values are calculated (see Section 4.9).
Figure 4Schematic of experimental setup for SDBD treatment of Alternaria toxins in wheat flour.
Parameters of the SDBD.
| Parameter * | Value |
|---|---|
| Variac voltage/frequency | 200 V/50 Hz |
| Applied RMS voltage/current | 2340 V/0.094 A |
| Sample weight | 10 g |
| Compartment box size (L × W × H) | 195 mm × 125 mm × 65 mm |
| Gas temperature | ≈40 °C |
* L: length, W: width, H: height.
Recovery data of the employed analytical method based on solvent (R) and matrix-matched (R) calibration curves and matrix effect (SSE).
| Analytes | Concentration Range | Overall Method Recovery | Sample Preparation Recovery | Matrix Effect | LOD/LOQ (µg kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOH | 2.5–100 | 90.4 | 80.4 | 112.5 | 0.75/2.5 |
| AME | 2.5–100 | 68.5 | 83.0 | 82.5 | 0.3/0.9 |
| TEN | 2.5–100 | 90.4 | 74.1 | 122.0 | 0.5/1.5 |
AOH—alternariol; AME—alternariol monomethyl ether; TEN—tentoxin; * Calculated by (slope of spiked sample-prepared curve/slope of solvent calibration curve); ** Calculated by (slope of spiked sample-prepared curve/slope of matrix-matched calibration curve); *** Calculated by (slope of matrix-matched calibration curve/slope of solvent calibration curve).
Precision data of the selected Alternaria toxins.
| Analytes | Spiking Level | Repeatability | Within-Laboratory Reproducibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| AOH | 25 | 11.2 | 11.8 |
| 50 | 7.4 | 8.8 | |
| 100 | 6.0 | 7.7 | |
| AME | 25 | 11.0 | 11.5 |
| 50 | 7.0 | 7.2 | |
| 100 | 3.1 | 6.1 | |
| TEN | 25 | 10.1 | 11.9 |
| 50 | 5.3 | 9.8 | |
| 100 | 3.4 | 6.2 |
AOH—alternariol; AME—alternariol monomethyl ether; TEN—tentoxin; RSD (%)—relative standard deviation of 6 replicates at three concentration levels using the spiked white wheat flour and the matrix-matched calibration (MMC) curve; RSDs (%)—relative standard deviation of 6 replicates at three concentration levels using the spiked white wheat flour and the MMC curve, over the course of three days, using the same instrument and by the same operators.