| Literature DB >> 32098250 |
Elizabet Janić Hajnal1, Lato Pezo2, Dejan Orčić3, Ljubiša Šarić1, Dragana Plavšić1, Jovana Kos1, Jasna Mastilović1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the fate of the most common Alternaria toxins found in wheat-tenuazonic acid (TeA), alternariol (AOH), and alternariol monomethyl ether (AME) during sourdough processing. For this purpose, spiked whole wheat flour, 3% sourdough starter, 0.5% of baker's yeast, and 105% of water calculated on flour weight as a base were used as raw materials. Spiked whole wheat dough was fermented for 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h at 25 °C, and at each point the fermented dough samples were taken, frozen, lyophilized, grounded, and stored until further analysis. To study the effect of sourdough processing on TeA, AOH and AME content, the validated method of high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for these mycotoxins was used. Mathematical models of Alternaria toxins reduction were developed in the form of Four Parameter Logistic Regression function. The maximum reduction of TeA, AOH, and AME levels was archived at 48 h of dough fermentation at 25 °C compared with dough after kneading (0 h). Under these conditions, a reduction of the toxin levels of 60.3 %, 41.5%, and 24.1% was observed for TeA, AOH, and AME, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: LC-MS/MS; alternariol; alternariol monomethyl ether; fermentation; mathematical modelling; reduction; sourdough; tenuazonic acid
Year: 2020 PMID: 32098250 PMCID: PMC7074859 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8020303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Recovery data of the employed analytical method based on solvent (RA) and matrix-matched (RE) calibration curves and matrix effect (SSE).
| Analytes | Concentration Range (µg kg−1) * | Overall Method Recovery | Sample Preparation Recovery | Matrix Effect SSE (%) **** | LOD/LOQ (µg kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| TeA | 2.5–100 | 87.6 | 70.0 | 125.3 | 2.5/7.5 |
| AOH | 2.5–100 | 70.4 | 70.4 | 100.1 | 0.75/2.5 |
| AME | 2.5–100 | 73.4 | 76.8 | 95.6 | 0.1/0.3 |
|
| |||||
| TeA | 2.5–100 | 83.5 | 96.0 | 87.0 | 3.5/11.6 |
| AOH | 2.5–100 | 87.5 | 86.9 | 100.7 | 0.75/2.5 |
| AME | 2.5–100 | 77.3 | 86.1 | 89.8 | 0.1/0.3 |
TeA—tenuazonic acid; AOH—alternariol; AME—alternariol monomethyl ether; * Range of concentration of analytes for standard, matrix matched calibration curves and calibration curve of spiked samples (µg kg−1). ** RA—Overall method recovery (%) calculated by slope of spiked sample-prepared curve/slope of solvent calibration curve; *** RE-Sample preparation recovery (%) calculated by slope of spiked sample-prepared curve/slope of matrix-matched calibration curve; **** SSE-matrix effect (%) calculated by slope of matrix-matched calibration curve/slope of solvent calibration curve; LOD—the limit of detection; LOQ—the limit of quantification.
Precision parameters of selected Alternaria toxins.
| TeA | AOH | AME | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spiking level (µg kg−1) | RSD (%) * ( | RSDs (%) ** ( | RSD (%) * ( | RSDs (%) ** ( | RSD (%) * ( | RSDs (%) ** ( |
|
| ||||||
| 25 | 10.7 | 13.6 | 8.8 | 9.2 | 7.5 | 9.0 |
| 50 | 8.3 | 9.2 | 5.4 | 6.8 | 5.1 | 6.9 |
| 100 | 7.8 | 8.9 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 4.0 | 5.7 |
|
| ||||||
| 25 | 11.3 | 16.3 | 6.6 | 12.2 | 5.5 | 10.6 |
| 50 | 10.6 | 12.7 | 5.5 | 9.9 | 4.4 | 8.8 |
| 100 | 9.1 | 10.6 | 5.4 | 9.3 | 4.0 | 8.2 |
TeA—tenuazonic acid; AOH—alternariol; AME—alternariol monomethyl ether; * Repeatability expressed as RSD (%)—relative standard deviation of 6 replicates at three concentration levels using the spiked whole wheat flour or fermented dough and the matrix-matched calibration (MMC) curve; ** Within-laboratory reproducibility expressed as RSDs (%)—relative standard deviation of 6 replicates at three concentration levels using the spiked whole wheat flour or fermented dough and the MMC curve, over the course of three days, using the same instrument and by the same operators.
Figure 1Resulting plots for the model of the leavening process of doughs: (a) reduction of tenuazonic acid (TeA), (b) reduction of alternariol (AOH), (c) reduction of alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), (d) pH of the dough during the process, (e) total lactic acid bacteria (LAB) count, (f) total yeast count.
Regression coefficients in tenuazonic acid (TeA), alternariol (AOH) and alternariol monomethyl ether (AME) reduction models and pH value, total lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and total yeast count prediction models.
| Coefficient | TeA * | AOH + | AME * | pH + | LAB + | TYC + |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | −0.981 | −0.003 | 0.366 | 5.587 + | 7.183 + | 7.160 + |
| b | 2.234 | 0.334 | 1.044 | 7.213 + | 1.859 | 51.607 |
| c | 10.010 * | 93.552 | 25.580 | 25.021 + | 18.560 | 8.033 |
| d | 59.228 * | 151.083 | 37.123 | 4.066 + | 9.258 + | 7.853 + |
TeA—tenuazonic acid; AOH—alternariol; AME—alternariol monomethyl ether; LAB—the lactic acid bacteria count; TYC—the total count of yeasts and molds. Each value is the mean of six replicates. Standard deviation values are given in parentheses. + Significant at p < 0.01 level, * Significant at p < 0.05.
The ’goodness of fit’ tests for TeA, AOH and AME reduction models and pH value, total LAB and total yeast count prediction models.
| Reduction |
| RMSE | MBE | MPE |
| Skew | Kurt | Mean | SD | Var. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeA | 21.043 | 2.648 | −0.472 | 0.000 | 0.979 | −0.070 | 0.489 | −0.567 | 3.181 | 10.120 |
| AOH | 2.566 | 0.925 | −0.119 | 0.000 | 0.993 | −0.610 | −0.775 | −0.143 | 1.121 | 1.258 |
| AME | 3.997 | 1.154 | 0.079 | 0.000 | 0.963 | 0.336 | −2.857 | 0.095 | 1.410 | 1.987 |
| pH | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.039 | 1.000 | −1.582 | 2.699 | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| LAB | 0.022 | 0.085 | 0.004 | 0.891 | 0.963 | −0.897 | −0.098 | 0.005 | 0.104 | 0.011 |
| TYC | 0.008 | 0.051 | 0.019 | 0.518 | 0.983 | −0.600 | −0.048 | 0.023 | 0.057 | 0.003 |
TeA—tenuazonic acid; AOH—alternariol; AME—alternariol monomethyl ether; LAB—the lactic acid bacteria count; TYC—the total count of yeasts and molds; χ2– reduced chi-square; RMSE—root mean square error; MBE—mean bias error; MPE—mean percentage error; r2—coefficient of determination; Skew—skeweness; Kurt.—kurtosis; SD—standard deviation; Var.—variance.