| Literature DB >> 31816826 |
Manuela Giovanna Basilicata1,2, Giacomo Pepe1, Shara Francesca Rapa1, Fabrizio Merciai1,2, Carmine Ostacolo3, Michele Manfra4, Veronica Di Sarno1, Giuseppina Autore1, Daniela De Vita5, Stefania Marzocco1, Pietro Campiglia1,6.
Abstract
Inflammation and oxidative stress are always more recognized as responsible for chronic disease at the intestinal level. Currently, a growing interest is addressed to the discovery of diet-derived products which have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. This work aims to characterize the pharmacological potential of dehydrated potatoes. For this purpose, a simulated gastrointestinal digestion was carried out. The bioaccessible peptides were fractionated on the basis of their molecular weight and tested on intestinal epithelial cells (IEC-6) under oxidative and inflammatory conditions. Our results demonstrate that the tested peptide fractions were able to significantly inhibit tumor necrosis factor-α release and cycloxygenase-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression. The tested peptides also showed significant antioxidant activity, being able to both reduce reactive oxygen species (ROS) release, also from mitochondria, and nitrotyrosine formation, and increase the antioxidant response by heme oxygenase-1 and superoxide dismutase expression. Moreover, the peptide fractions were able to significantly increase the wound repair in IEC-6. The obtained results indicate the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant potential of dehydrated potatoes at the intestinal level.Entities:
Keywords: bioactive peptides; in vitro gastrointestinal digestion; inflammation; intestinal epithelial cells; oxidative stress; potato proteins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31816826 PMCID: PMC6928682 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20236087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Total ion current (TIC) chromatograms of peptides derived from simulated GI digestion of dehydrated potatoes. The peptide fractions were obtained by ultrafiltration with different cut-off membranes (a): 3–10 kDa; (b): 1–3 kDa; (c): <1 kDa).
Figure 2Effect of three dehydrated potato peptides (1–10 µg/mL) on TNF-α release, induced by LPS + IFN in IEC-6 cellular medium, evaluated by ELISA assay. The figure shows that the three tested fractions significantly inhibited TNF-α release. Data are expressed as pg/mL of TNF-α release. C denotes control group. *** and ** denote respectively p < 0.001 and p < 0.01 vs. LPS + IFN; ### denotes p < 0.001 vs. C.
Figure 3Effect of the three fractions of dehydrated potato peptides (1–10 µg/mL) on LPS + IFN-stimulated IEC-6 cells. The figure shows that the three tested fractions significantly inhibited COX-2 (p < 0.01 vs. LPS + IFN) (a) and iNOS (p < 0.05 vs. LPS + IFN) (b) expression, evaluated by the cytofluorimetric technique. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of mean fluorescence intensity. Comparisons were performed using a one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons were made by Bonferroni’s post-test. ***, **, and * indicate respectively p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05 vs. LPS + IFN. ### denotes p < 0.001 vs. C.
Figure 4Effect of the three fractions on intracellular and mitochondrial ROS release and on nitrotyrosine formation. The three tested fractions (1–10 µg/mL) significantly inhibited intracellular ROS release, both (a) in LPS + IFN-stimulated cells and (b) in cells treated with H2O2 (p < 0.001 vs. LPS + IFN; p < 0.05 vs. H2O2), evaluated by means of the probe 2′,7′ dichlorofluorescein-diacetate (H2DCF-DA). (c) Mitochondrial superoxide production (p < 0.001 vs. LPS + IFN) was evaluated by MitoSOX Red. (d) Reduction of nitrotyrosine formation by the fractions (1–10 µg/mL) (p < 0.001 vs. LPS + IFN) in LPS + IFN-stimulated cells. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of mean fluorescence intensity, evaluated by the cytofluorimetric technique. Comparisons were performed using a one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons were made by Bonferroni’s post-test. *** and * denote respectively p < 0.001 and p < 0.05 vs. LPS + IFN or vs. H2O2. ### denotes p < 0.001 vs. C.
Figure 5Effect of the three fractions (1–10 µg/mL) on HO-1 (a) and SOD (b) expression in LPS + IFN-stimulated IEC-6 cells. The three tested fractions significantly increased HO-1 (p < 0.01 vs. LPS + IFN) (a) and SOD (p < 0.01 vs. LPS + IFN) (b) expression, evaluated by the cytofluorimetric technique. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of mean fluorescence intensity. Comparisons were performed using a one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons were made by Bonferroni’s post-test. *** and ** indicate respectively p < 0.001 and p < 0.01 vs. LPS + IFN.
Figure 6Effect of the three fractions (5–10 µg/mL) on cell migration after induction of mechanical scratch in IEC-6 treated with LPS + IFN; Bar = 150µm (a), and the quantitative analysis expressed as IEC-6 migration rate after 24 h (b). Values are expressed as migration rate (µm/hour). *** and * denote respectively p < 0.001 and p < 0.05 vs. LPS + IFN. ### denotes p < 0.001 vs. C.