Literature DB >> 31813754

Complications associated with orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study of 485 cases.

Fabio Marzullo Zaroni1, Rafael Correia Cavalcante2, Delson João da Costa3, Leandro Eduardo Klüpple4, Rafaela Scariot5, Nelson Luis Barbosa Rebellato6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the most prevalent types of complications associated with orthognathic surgery and its possible risk factors.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective investigation of records of 485 patients who underwent orthognathic surgery between 2008 and 2014 at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service at the Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil. Types of complications were recorded. Independent variables such as sex, age, duration of surgery and hospitalization, number of surgeries, surgical site, and types of osteotomy performed were evaluated. Complications were also evaluated based on the treatment according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification. Data were submitted to statistical analysis with a significance level of 0.05.
RESULTS: A total of 93 complications were reported (19.2%), including postoperative malocclusion, hemorrhage, inferior alveolar nerve injury, bad split, and infection. Complications were more common in men (p = 0.029). The number of complications was higher in surgeries that took more time to perform (p < 0.05) when the entire sample was taken into consideration. The prevalence of complications was related to a higher number of procedures per surgery (p = 0.019). Complications were more frequent in mandibular procedures (p = 0.010), particularly in bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (p < 0.001). Related to treatment, Clavien-Dindo grade I complications were the most frequent (72.04%). There was no association between sex, age, surgery duration, length of hospitalization, or surgical site with complication grades according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (p ≥ 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Postoperative malocclusion, hemorrhage, inferior alveolar nerve injury, bad split and infection are the most prevalent complication in orthognathic surgery. They seem to be related to sex, duration of surgery, number of surgeries, surgical site, and the type of osteotomy performed. With these in mind, it is possible to explain to the patient the different levels of severity of complications related to the surgery.
Copyright © 2019 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Dentofacial deformity; Orthognathic surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31813754     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  10 in total

1.  Computer-Assisted Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction and Implant Rehabilitation of the Maxilla-Treatment of a Rare Post-orthognathic Complication.

Authors:  John M Le; Jordan Gigliotti; Yedeh Ying; Michael T Kase; Anthony B Morlandt
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2021-01-06

2.  A novel machine learning model for class III surgery decision.

Authors:  Hunter Lee; Sunna Ahmad; Michael Frazier; Mehmet Murat Dundar; Hakan Turkkahraman
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  The Accuracy of Jaws Repositioning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate Compared to Non-Syndromic Skeletal Class III Patients.

Authors:  Benedetta Bollato; Martina Barone; Antonio Gracco; Ugo Baciliero; Giorgia Crivellin; Giovanni Bruno; Alberto De Stefani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Risk Factors for Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and Delayed Extubation Following Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Christian I Schwer; Teresa Roth; Mathieu Gass; René Rothweiler; Torsten Loop; Marc C Metzger; Johannes Kalbhenn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in the Shortest Buccal Bone Marrow Distances of the Mandible on the Coronal Plane.

Authors:  Chun-Ming Chen; Han-Jen Hsu; Ping-Ho Chen; Shih-Wei Liang; I-Ling Lin; Kun-Jung Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Differences in the Buccal Bone Marrow Distance of ≤0.8 mm in the Mandible of Patients Undergoing Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy among the Different Skeletal Patterns: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yu-Chuan Tseng; Shih-Wei Liang; Szu-Ting Chou; Shih-Chieh Chen; Chin-Yun Pan; Chun-Ming Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  A clinico-statistical study of factors associated with intraoperative bleeding in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Keisuke Sugahara; Yu Koyama; Masahide Koyachi; Akira Watanabe; Kiyohiro Kasahara; Masayuki Takano; Akira Katakura
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-02-25

Review 8.  Relapse and temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD) as postoperative complication in skeletal class III patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas Gosla Reddy; Ashutosh Dixit; Padmanidhi Agarwal; Rebecca Chowdhry; Ashi Chug
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  The Accuracy of Jaws Repositioning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery with Traditional Surgical Planning Compared to Digital Surgical Planning in Skeletal Class III Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Martina Barone; Alberto De Stefani; Ugo Baciliero; Giovanni Bruno; Antonio Gracco
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Quality assessment of patient information on orthognathic surgery on the internet.

Authors:  Johannes Engelmann; Carmen Fischer; Emeka Nkenke
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.078

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.