Literature DB >> 31813583

Imaging Methods for Ultrasound Contrast Agents.

Michalakis A Averkiou1, Matthew F Bruce2, Jeffry E Powers3, Paul S Sheeran4, Peter N Burns5.   

Abstract

Microbubble contrast agents were introduced more than 25 years ago with the objective of enhancing blood echoes and enabling diagnostic ultrasound to image the microcirculation. Cardiology and oncology waited anxiously for the fulfillment of that objective with one clinical application each: myocardial perfusion, tumor perfusion and angiogenesis imaging. What was necessary though at first was the scientific understanding of microbubble behavior in vivo and the development of imaging technology to deliver the original objective. And indeed, for more than 25 years bubble science and imaging technology have evolved methodically to deliver contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Realization of the basic bubbles properties, non-linear response and ultrasound-induced destruction, has led to a plethora of methods; algorithms and techniques for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and imaging modes such as harmonic imaging, harmonic power Doppler, pulse inversion, amplitude modulation, maximum intensity projection and many others were invented, developed and validated. Today, CEUS is used everywhere in the world with clinical indications both in cardiology and in radiology, and it continues to mature and evolve and has become a basic clinical tool that transforms diagnostic ultrasound into a functional imaging modality. In this review article, we present and explain in detail bubble imaging methods and associated artifacts, perfusion quantification approaches, and implementation considerations and regulatory aspects.
Copyright © 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast agents; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Microbubbles; Non-linear imaging

Year:  2019        PMID: 31813583     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  14 in total

1.  Tumor Vascular Networks Depicted in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Images as a Predictor for Transarterial Chemoembolization Treatment Response.

Authors:  Ipek Oezdemir; Corrine E Wessner; Colette Shaw; John R Eisenbrey; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Comparison of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) quantified with ImageJ to quantified contrast-enhanced ultrasound (qCEUS) in liver metastases-a pilot study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kratzer; Melanie Güthle; Felix Dobler; Thomas Seufferlein; Tilmann Graeter; Julian Schmidberger; Thomas Fe Barth; Jochen Klaus
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

3.  Faster super-resolution ultrasound imaging with a deep learning model for tissue decluttering and contrast agent localization.

Authors:  Katherine G Brown; Scott Chase Waggener; Arthur David Redfern; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2021-10-25

Review 4.  A literature review on the imaging methods for breast cancer.

Authors:  Reza Gerami; Saeid Sadeghi Joni; Negin Akhondi; Ali Etemadi; Mahnaz Fosouli; Aynaz Foroughi Eghbal; Zobin Souri
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 5.  The evolving role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in urology: a review.

Authors:  Andrew Salib; Ethan Halpern; John Eisenbrey; Thenappan Chandrasekar; Paul H Chung; Flemming Forsberg; Edouard J Trabulsi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  A Comparison of the Sensitivity of Contrast-Specific Imaging Modes on Clinical and Preclinical Ultrasound Scanners.

Authors:  Carmel M Moran; Charles Arthur; Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-09-15

7.  High-frame-rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound particle image velocimetry in patients with a stented superficial femoral artery: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Majorie van Helvert; Stefan Engelhard; Jason Voorneveld; Marije van der Vee; Johan G Bosch; Michel Versluis; Erik Groot Jebbink; Michel M P J Reijnen
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2022-07-06

8.  Microbubble-Enhanced Heating: Exploring the Effect of Microbubble Concentration and Pressure Amplitude on High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatments.

Authors:  Alicia Clark; Sierra Bonilla; Dingjie Suo; Yeruham Shapira; Michalakis Averkiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Characterization of an Array-Based Dual-Frequency Transducer for Superharmonic Contrast Imaging.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Emmanuel Cherin; Jianhua Yin; Isabel G Newsome; Thomas M Kierski; Guofeng Pang; Claudia A Carnevale; Paul A Dayton; F Stuart Foster; Christine E M Demore
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment of mouse myocardial infarction: comparison of kinetic parameters with conventional methods.

Authors:  Nicholas T Thielen; Adison A Kleinsasser; Jessica L Freeling
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.