Literature DB >> 24146217

Capuchins' (Cebus apella) sensitivity to others' goal-directed actions in a helping context.

Lindsey A Drayton1, Laurie R Santos.   

Abstract

As humans, our ability to help others effectively is at least in part dependent upon our capacity to infer others' goals in a variety of different contexts. Several species of nonhuman primate have demonstrated that they will also help others in some relatively simple situations, but it is not always clear whether this helping is based on an understanding of another agent's goals. Although the results of a number of different studies support the hypothesis that chimpanzees represent others' goals in various helping contexts and are sensitive to these goals when actually helping others, less work has addressed whether more distantly related species actively represent goals when helping. To explore the cognitive mechanisms underlying helping behaviors in species less closely related to humans, we tested whether a species of New World monkey-the brown capuchin (Cebus apella)-would provide an experimenter with a desired out-of-reach object more often than an alternative object when the experimenter attempted to obtain the former object only. We found that capuchins reliably helped by providing the experimenter's goal object (Experiment 1) and that explanations based on the use of several less sophisticated strategies did not account for the overall pattern of data (Experiments 2-4). Results are thus consistent with the hypothesis that capuchins help others based on an understanding of their goals although more work is needed to address the possibility that capuchins may be responding to gestural and postural factors alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24146217     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-013-0700-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  11 in total

Review 1.  Empathy: gender effects in brain and behavior.

Authors:  Leonardo Christov-Moore; Elizabeth A Simpson; Gino Coudé; Kristina Grigaityte; Marco Iacoboni; Pier Francesco Ferrari
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  Social Decision-Making and the Brain: A Comparative Perspective.

Authors:  Sébastien Tremblay; K M Sharika; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Orangutans (Pongo spp.) do not spontaneously share benefits with familiar conspecifics in a choice paradigm.

Authors:  Yena Kim; Laura Martinez; Jae Chun Choe; Dal-Ju Lee; Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.163

4.  Not by the same token: A female orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) is selectively prosocial.

Authors:  Hope Emigh; Jordyn Truax; Lauren Highfill; Jennifer Vonk
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 2.163

Review 5.  Neural Mechanisms of Social Cognition in Primates.

Authors:  Marco K Wittmann; Patricia L Lockwood; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Little evidence that Eurasian jays protect their caches by responding to cues about a conspecific's desire and visual perspective.

Authors:  Piero Amodio; Benjamin G Farrar; Christopher Krupenye; Ljerka Ostojić; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  The nature of prosociality in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Claudio Tennie; Keith Jensen; Josep Call
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  'Unwilling' versus 'unable': Tonkean macaques' understanding of human goal-directed actions.

Authors:  Charlotte Canteloup; Hélène Meunier
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  Critical issues in experimental studies of prosociality in non-human species.

Authors:  S Marshall-Pescini; R Dale; M Quervel-Chaumette; F Range
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Pet dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) release their trapped and distressed owners: Individual variation and evidence of emotional contagion.

Authors:  Joshua Van Bourg; Jordan Elizabeth Patterson; Clive D L Wynne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.