Literature DB >> 31810021

Exploring the incidence and nature of nursing-sensitive orthopaedic adverse events: A multicenter cohort study using Global Trigger Tool.

Ami Hommel1, Martin Magnéli2, Bodil Samuelsson3, Kristina Schildmeijer4, Desirée Sjöstrand5, Katarina E Göransson6, Maria Unbeck7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For decades, patient safety has been recognized as a critical global healthcare issue. However, there is a gap of knowledge of all types of adverse events sensitive to nursing care within hospitals in general and within orthopaedic care specifically.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to explore the incidence and nature of nursing-sensitive adverse events following elective or acute hip arthroplasty at a national level.
DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter cohort study. OUTCOME VARIABLES: Nursing-sensitive adverse events, preventability, severity and length of stay.
METHODS: All patients, 18 years or older, who had undergone an elective (degenerative joint disease) or acute (fractures) hemi or total hip arthroplasty surgery at 24 hospitals were eligible for inclusion. Retrospective reviews of weighted samples of 1998 randomly selected patient records were carried out using the Swedish version of the Global Trigger Tool. The patients were followed for readmissions up to 90 days postoperatively throughout the whole country regardless of index hospital.
RESULTS: A total of 1150 nursing-sensitive adverse events were identified in 728 (36.4%) of patient records, and 943 (82.0%) of the adverse events were judged preventable in the study cohort. The adjusted cumulative incidence regarding nursing-sensitive adverse events for the study population was 18.8%. The most common nursing-sensitive adverse event types were different kinds of healthcare-associated infections (40.9%) and pressure ulcers (16.5%). Significantly higher proportions of nursing-sensitive adverse events were found among female patients compared to male, p < 0.001, and patients with acute admissions compared to elective patients, p < 0.001. Almost half (48.5%) of the adverse events were temporary and of a less severe nature. On the other hand, 592 adverse events were estimated to have contributed to 3351 extra hospital days.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the magnitude of nursing-sensitive adverse events. We found that nursing-sensitive adverse events were common, in most cases deemed preventable and were associated with different kinds of adverse events and levels of severity in orthopaedic care. Registered nurses play a vital role within the interdisciplinary team as they are the largest group of healthcare professionals, work 24/7 and spend much time at the bedside with patients. Therefore, nursing leadership at all hospital levels must assume responsibility for patient safety and authorize bedside registered nurses to deliver high-quality and sustainable care to patients.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse event; Global Trigger Tool; Hip arthroplasty; Nursing care; Record review

Year:  2019        PMID: 31810021     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  7 in total

1.  Effect of care intervention based on susceptible pointers of care quality in patients with hepatic cerebropathy.

Authors:  Lina Chen; Suyu Rao; Shuyu Fan; Chenwei Pan; Minou Liu; Liyun Yi; Junyi Guo
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Effect of WeChat-Based Health Preaching Combined with an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Model on Perioperative Limb Motor Function and Complications in Orthopaedic Patients.

Authors:  Zhijuan Pang; Bin Hu; Dejun Chai; Ping Li; Le Ma; Lei Liu; Wei Li
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.682

3.  Clinical Application Value of Group-Sharing Nursing Management Based on Case Analysis.

Authors:  Jing Mei; Yifan Wu; Jie Hu; Min Li
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.009

4.  Variation in detected adverse events using trigger tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luisa C Eggenschwiler; Anne W S Rutjes; Sarah N Musy; Dietmar Ausserhofer; Natascha M Nielen; René Schwendimann; Maria Unbeck; Michael Simon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  A co-created nurse-driven catheterisation protocol can reduce bladder distension in acute hip fracture patients - results from a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Maria Frödin; Bengt Nellgård; Cecilia Rogmark; Brigid M Gillespie; Ewa Wikström; Annette Erichsen Andersson
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-10-12

6.  Measuring adverse events following hip arthroplasty surgery using administrative data without relying on ICD-codes.

Authors:  Martin Magnéli; Maria Unbeck; Cecilia Rogmark; Olof Sköldenberg; Max Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Occurrence of No-Harm Incidents and Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients with Ischemic Stroke or TIA: A Cohort Study Using Trigger Tool Methodology.

Authors:  Bartosch Nowak; René Schwendimann; Philippe Lyrer; Leo H Bonati; Gian Marco De Marchis; Nils Peters; Franziska Zúñiga; Lili Saar; Maria Unbeck; Michael Simon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.