Literature DB >> 31808980

Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomics for Prostate Cancer Screening With PSA in 4-10 ng/mL to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.

Yafei Qi1, Shuaitong Zhang2,3, Jingwei Wei2,3, Gumuyang Zhang1, Jing Lei1, Weigang Yan4, Yu Xiao5, Shuang Yan1, Huadan Xue1, Feng Feng1, Hao Sun1, Jie Tian2,6,7, Zhengyu Jin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 4-10 ng/mL should be recommended for a biopsy is clinically challenging.
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a radiomics model based on multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) in patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/mL to predict prostate cancer (PCa) preoperatively and reduce unnecessary biopsies. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
SUBJECTS: In all, 199 patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/mL. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T, T2 -weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. ASSESSMENT: Lesion regions of interest (ROIs) from T2 -weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were annotated by two radiologists. A total of 2104 radiomic features were extracted from the ROI of each patient. A random forest classifier was used to build the radiomics model for PCa in the primary cohort. A combined model was constructed using multivariate logistic regression by incorporating the radiomics signature and clinical-radiological risk factors. STATISTICAL TESTS: For continuous variables, variance equality was assessed by Levene's test and Student's t-test, and Welch's t-test was used to assess between-group differences. For categorical variables, Pearson's chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or the approximate chi-square test was used to assess between-group differences. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The combined model incorporating the multi-imaging fusion model, age, PSA density (PSAD), and the PI-RADS v2 score yielded area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.956 and 0.933 on the primary (n = 133) and validation (n = 66) cohorts, respectively. Compared with the clinical-radiological model, the combined model performed better on both the primary and validation cohorts (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the use of the combined model to predict PCa could identify more negative PCa patients than the use of the clinical-radiological model by 18.4%. DATA
CONCLUSION: The combined model was developed and validated to provide potential preoperative prediction of PCa in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/mL and might aid in treatment decision-making and reduce unnecessary biopsies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1890-1899.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; radiomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31808980     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  13 in total

Review 1.  Semen as a rich source of diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer: latest evidence and implications.

Authors:  Chenyu Mao; Yongfeng Ding; Nong Xu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 2.  MRI determined prostate volume and the incidence of prostate cancer on MRI-fusion biopsy: a systemic review of reported data for the last 20 years.

Authors:  Andrew S Knight; Pranav Sharma; Werner T W de Riese
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Evaluation of the Efficiency of MRI-Based Radiomics Classifiers in the Diagnosis of Prostate Lesions.

Authors:  Linghao Li; Lili Gu; Bin Kang; Jiaojiao Yang; Ying Wu; Hao Liu; Shasha Lai; Xueting Wu; Jian Jiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Radiomics Based on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Lili Xu; Gumuyang Zhang; Lun Zhao; Li Mao; Xiuli Li; Weigang Yan; Yu Xiao; Jing Lei; Hao Sun; Zhengyu Jin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Associations between Statin/Omega3 Usage and MRI-Based Radiomics Signatures in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Ethan Wahle; Qian Du; Luke Krajewski; Xiaoying Liang; Sumin Zhou; Chi Zhang; Michael Baine; Dandan Zheng
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 6.  Radiomic and Genomic Machine Learning Method Performance for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Leandro Pecchia; Monica Franzese; Rossana Castaldo; Carlo Cavaliere; Andrea Soricelli; Marco Salvatore
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Development and validation of a multiparametric MRI-based radiomics signature for distinguishing between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Liuhui Zhang; Donggen Jiang; Chujie Chen; Xiangwei Yang; Hanqi Lei; Zhuang Kang; Hai Huang; Jun Pang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence Based Algorithms for Prostate Cancer Classification and Detection on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jasper J Twilt; Kicky G van Leeuwen; Henkjan J Huisman; Jurgen J Fütterer; Maarten de Rooij
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 9.  Radiomics in Oncology, Part 2: Thoracic, Genito-Urinary, Breast, Neurological, Hematologic and Musculoskeletal Applications.

Authors:  Damiano Caruso; Michela Polici; Marta Zerunian; Francesco Pucciarelli; Gisella Guido; Tiziano Polidori; Federica Landolfi; Matteo Nicolai; Elena Lucertini; Mariarita Tarallo; Benedetta Bracci; Ilaria Nacci; Carlotta Rucci; Marwen Eid; Elsa Iannicelli; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Radiomics in prostate cancer imaging for a personalized treatment approach - current aspects of methodology and a systematic review on validated studies.

Authors:  Simon K B Spohn; Alisa S Bettermann; Fabian Bamberg; Matthias Benndorf; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Tobias Fechter; Tobias Hölscher; Radu Grosu; Arturo Chiti; Anca L Grosu; Constantinos Zamboglou
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.