Literature DB >> 3180814

The locus of mineral crystallites in bone.

S Lees1, K Prostak.   

Abstract

The organic content of mineralized tissues has been found to decrease with increasing tissue density, from about 60% of the mineral weight in light bone like deer antler to 1 to 2% in hyperdense bone like porpoise petrosal. The ratio of the weight of mineral that can fill the collagen hole zones to the total mineral content can be no greater than 20% for deer antler and decreases to less than 5% for hyperdense bone. Moreover, the dimensions of hydroxyapatite crystallites have been determined by various investigators to be larger than the intermolecular spacing of collagen molecules. Such crystallites can only be fitted within the collagen fibril if collagen molecules are packed differently from the accepted models. Electron micrographs of fish dentin, at a very early stage of mineralization, show the needle-like crystallites lying in dense strips between collagen fibrils and practically no crystallites within the fibrils. A similar pattern of dense strips of crystallites between fibrils can be identified in examples from more advanced stages of mineralization, taken from fish dentin, cat dentin and cow tibia, even though some of the needle-like crystallites are superimposed on the fibril banded pattern. In every instance there are regions of the fibrils where there are no visible needle-like crystallites. Examination of the work of others shows a similar distribution of the mineral component, except that none exactly resemble the micrograph of the earliest stage of fish dentin provided in this report. The collagen banding is observed to be in spatial phase over many fibrils. The needle-like crystallites may be observed to be bunched in phase with the collagen banding and with the same spatial periodicity. The bunching is most obvious in the least densely mineralized specimens. This observation can account for the x-ray and neutron diffraction patterns which shown the axial period of the mineral to be like that of the collagen axial macroperiod and to be in phase with the hole zones of collagen fibrils. These prior studies were interpreted to show that the crystallites must be within the hole zones. Our images are interpreted to show that most of the mineral is outside of the collagen fibrils in the extrafibrillar volume. The interpretation is in agreement with neutron diffraction studies of various mineralized tissues as well as with earlier diffraction studies of mineralized turkey leg tendon and with the calculations of the amount of mineral that can be contained within the collagen of mineralized tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3180814     DOI: 10.3109/03008208809019071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Connect Tissue Res        ISSN: 0300-8207            Impact factor:   3.417


  11 in total

1.  The nanometre-scale physiology of bone: steric modelling and scanning transmission electron microscopy of collagen-mineral structure.

Authors:  Benjamin Alexander; Tyrone L Daulton; Guy M Genin; Justin Lipner; Jill D Pasteris; Brigitte Wopenka; Stavros Thomopoulos
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Nucleation and growth of mineral crystals in bone studied by small-angle X-ray scattering.

Authors:  P Fratzl; N Fratzl-Zelman; K Klaushofer; G Vogl; K Koller
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  The loci of mineral in turkey leg tendon as seen by atomic force microscope and electron microscopy.

Authors:  S Lees; K S Prostak; V K Ingle; K Kjoller
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Three-dimensional ordered distribution of crystals in turkey tendon collagen fibers.

Authors:  W Traub; T Arad; S Weiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Techniques to assess bone ultrastructure organization: orientation and arrangement of mineralized collagen fibrils.

Authors:  Marios Georgiadis; Ralph Müller; Philipp Schneider
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Contribution of collagen and mineral to the elastic anisotropy of bone.

Authors:  K Hasegawa; C H Turner; D B Burr
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  Strategies for Bone Regeneration: From Graft to Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Giulia Battafarano; Michela Rossi; Viviana De Martino; Francesco Marampon; Luca Borro; Aurelio Secinaro; Andrea Del Fattore
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Layered water in crystal interfaces as source for bone viscoelasticity: arguments from a multiscale approach.

Authors:  Lukas Eberhardsteiner; Christian Hellmich; Stefan Scheiner
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 1.763

10.  Poromicromechanics reveals that physiological bone strains induce osteocyte-stimulating lacunar pressure.

Authors:  Stefan Scheiner; Peter Pivonka; Christian Hellmich
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2015-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.