Literature DB >> 31807691

Chemical Control over Nucleation and Anisotropic Growth of Two-Dimensional Covalent Organic Frameworks.

Ioannina Castano1, Austin M Evans1, Haoyuan Li2, Edon Vitaku1, Michael J Strauss1, Jean-Luc Brédas2, Nathan C Gianneschi1,3,4,5,6,7, William R Dichtel1,5.   

Abstract

Two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks (2D COFs) are composed of structurally precise, permanently porous, layered polymer sheets. 2D COFs have traditionally been synthesized as polycrystalline aggregates with small crystalline domains. Only recently have a small number of 2D COFs been obtained as single crystals, which were prepared by a seeded growth approach via the slow introduction of monomers, which favored particle growth over nucleation. However, these procedures are slow and operationally difficult, making it desirable to develop polymerization methods that do not require the continuous addition of reactants over days or weeks. Here, we achieve the rapid growth of boronate ester-linked COFs by chemically suppressing nucleation via addition of an excess of a monofunctional competitor, 4-tert-butylcatechol (TCAT), into the polymerization. In situ X-ray scattering measurements show that TCAT suppresses colloid nucleation, which enables seeded growth polymerizations in the presence of high monomer concentrations. Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations reveal that TCAT limits oligomers to sizes below the critical nucleus size and that in-plane expansion is restricted compared to out-of-plane oriented attachment of oligomers. The simulations are consistent with transmission electron micrographs, which show that the particles grow predominantly in the stacking direction. This mechanistic insight into the role of the modulators in 2D polymerizations enables the size and aspect ratio of COF colloids to be controlled under operationally simple conditions. This chemically controlled growth strategy will accelerate the discovery and exploration of COF materials and their emergent properties.
Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31807691      PMCID: PMC6891846          DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Cent Sci        ISSN: 2374-7943            Impact factor:   14.553


Introduction

The polymerization of monomers into periodic two-dimensional (2D) networks produces covalently linked sheets, which provides combinations of properties not found in traditional polymer architectures.[1−3] For example, 2D covalent organic frameworks (COFs) feature precise monomer arrangements and permanent porosity,[4−6] which makes them of interest for applications including energy storage,[7,8] catalysis,[9] membranes,[10−13] chemical separations,[11] and organic electronic devices.[14−16] Despite the potential of these materials, most 2D COFs are isolated as insoluble powders with small crystalline domains, typically on the order of 50 nm for the in-plane dimension and far less for the out-of-plane, which limits their relevance for otherwise promising applications.[4,17,18] In previous mechanistic studies of COF polymerization, Smith et al. identified an irreversible precipitation in boronate ester-linked systems that prevented further crystallite growth.[17] This drawback was later overcome by including nitrile cosolvents, which prevented aggregation and provided colloidal suspensions of COF nanoparticles (Figure ).[19] These colloids were then grown into micron-sized single crystals by the slow addition of monomers (Figure ).[20] By limiting the steady-state concentration of monomers, nucleation of new particles was suppressed, and addition to the preformed colloid seeds dominated the polymerization process.[18] Despite this improved advance in our understanding and control of COF nucleation and growth, this procedure required the continuous addition of monomers over weeks to grow micron-sized single crystals. Recent mechanistic analysis revealed a nonlinear time dependence for crystal expansion, suggesting that slow additions will be even less practical for growing millimeter-sized or larger 2D COF crystals.[21] Ultimately, the time and operational complexity associated with this procedure, such as requiring a dedicated syringe pump for each experiment, severely limits the efficiency of exploring variations in conditions to further improve materials quality.
Figure 1

Schematic of 2D polymerization approaches. Monomers nucleate to form 2D colloidal seeds (left). Pre-existing COF colloid seeds can be grown via slow addition of monomers to seeds resulting in slow, rate controlled growth (top right) or instantaneous addition of monomers resulting in rapid, chemically controlled growth (bottom right).

Schematic of 2D polymerization approaches. Monomers nucleate to form 2D colloidal seeds (left). Pre-existing COF colloid seeds can be grown via slow addition of monomers to seeds resulting in slow, rate controlled growth (top right) or instantaneous addition of monomers resulting in rapid, chemically controlled growth (bottom right). Here, we demonstrate control of 2D COF nucleation by adding an excess of a monofunctional modulator, 4-tert-butylcatechol (TCAT), to the polymerization (Figure ). The addition of monofunctional species, or modulating agents, in the synthesis of particles, such as quantum dots and nanoparticles,[22] or porous materials, such as metal–organic frameworks and zeolites,[23−25] has been shown to influence their nucleation, growth, and crystallization processes. Bein and co-workers reported that the addition of monofunctional boronic acid modulators in COF-5 powder syntheses increases their crystallinity and functionalizes their edges,[26] while Dichtel and co-workers demonstrated that monofunctional catechols slow the precipitation of 2D COF powders.[17] Additionally, Dichtel and co-workers have shown that, in 3D systems, inclusion of partially truncated monomers or monofunctional modulators can lead to significant internal functionalization of boronate ester-linked 3D COF powders.[27,28] More recently, this modulation concept has been successfully implemented in 3D imine-linked systems and provided the first imine-linked 3D COF single crystals.[29] However, the effect of modulators on the nucleation and growth processes of 2D COFs is not well-understood. To deconvolute the effect of TCAT on nucleation and growth, a combination of techniques was used including in situ X-ray scattering, dynamic light scattering (DLS), 1H NMR spectroscopy, and kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) modeling. In situ X-ray scattering and DLS measurements revealed that addition of TCAT to COF monomer solutions decreases the rate of colloid nucleation without shutting down the seeded growth of pre-existing colloid particles. This result is consistent with KMC simulations, which show that modulators limit the average size of oligomers in solution to lower than the critical nucleation size. These experiments unambiguously demonstrate that the nucleation process can be shut down for all four COFs investigated, without eliminating seeded growth. The addition of a modulator in the seeded growth mixture produces large, high-quality 2D COF particles, as determined by in situ X-ray scattering, 1H NMR spectroscopy, nitrogen sorption, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We hypothesized that the addition of a monofunctional modulating agent would dynamically cap the growing colloid particles, thus promoting the exchange of reversible bonds and the growth of the colloids over the formation of new nuclei (Figure ). Furthermore, KMC simulations combined with previous reaction pathway analysis[30] suggest that the addition of modulators might change the relative rates of growth in the in-plane (covalent bonding) and out-of-plane (stacking) directions such that the particles grow preferentially in the stacking direction.[30] While preferential growth is not easily characterized in polycrystalline powder products, this effect is confirmed by TEM of the COF colloids grown in the presence of TCAT, which are primarily elongated by oriented attachment of oligomers in the out-of-plane (stacking) direction. This approach represents the first example of anisotropically manipulating 2D polymer growth along a specific crystalline direction. Furthermore, previous 2D COF syntheses have involved empirical optimization and parallel experiments that have traditionally identified conditions with uncontrolled nucleation. This controlled nucleation approach identifies conditions that are amenable to parallelization, which will dramatically simplify and accelerate the discovery and optimization of functional 2D COF systems.

Results and Discussion

The addition of a monofunctional catechol, TCAT, to 2D COF polymerizations suppresses colloid nucleation in a concentration-dependent manner. TCAT, which we previously used to slow COF precipitation,[31] was chosen as the modulating agent (Figure S9) because both TCAT itself and its boronate ester-linked oligomers are highly soluble in the polymerization solvent. Monomer solutions of 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenylene (HHTP, 2 mM) and 1,4-phenylenebis(boronic acid) (PBBA, 3 mM) in CH3CN:1,4-dioxane:mesitylene (80/16/4 v/v/v) were prepared, and variable amounts of TCAT (equiv = [TCAT]/[PBBA]) were added to these solutions (Figure A). In situ small-angle and wide-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS/WAXS) techniques were used to identify the nucleation of COF-5 colloids. SAXS experiments monitored at 70 °C for 60 min show that TCAT loadings of 0, 3, and 5 equiv fail to suppress nucleation, as made evident by the increase in intensity and shift of the traces to less negative log(Q space) values, which indicates larger particle size (Figure B, Figure S5).[19] In contrast, SAXS traces of reaction mixtures containing 10 and 15 equiv of TCAT show little to no change over the same time period, suggesting that large species are not formed and therefore that nucleation is suppressed (Figure B). To determine the occurrence and rate of COF nucleation, we monitored the intensity of the COF-5 (100) Bragg diffraction peak (Q = 0.24 Å–1) over time (Figure S5). As the TCAT loading increased from 0 to 15 equiv, this diffraction peak appeared more slowly and was not observed after 60 min for the 10 and 15 equiv conditions, which is consistent with the SAXS data (Figure C). To examine the extent of nucleation suppression with a 15 equiv TCAT loading, we continued to heat our modulated monomer solution at 70 °C for 48 h. By comparing the WAXS traces (Figure D) to that of monomer without added modulator, we can clearly see the absence of a (100) Bragg diffraction peak even after 48 h of heating, suggesting that 15 equiv of TCAT effectively suppresses colloid nucleation over longer periods than the typical minutes-long COF-5 colloid polymerization time.[19] Additionally, 1H NMR time course experiments of the reaction mixture with 15 equiv of TCAT display the formation of small PBBATCAT oligomers and limited change in HHTP intensity over 48 h, further indicating that nucleation is suppressed (Figure S15 and Table S2).
Figure 2

Chemically suppressed COF-5 nucleation. (A) Schematic of COF-5 nucleation delayed by the addition of TCAT. (B) In situ SAXS of PBBA/HHTP condensation with variable TCAT loading. (C) In situ WAXS of PBBA/HHTP condensation with variable TCAT loading. (D) WAXS traces of COF-5 monomer with 15 equiv of TCAT loading over time.

Chemically suppressed COF-5 nucleation. (A) Schematic of COF-5 nucleation delayed by the addition of TCAT. (B) In situ SAXS of PBBA/HHTP condensation with variable TCAT loading. (C) In situ WAXS of PBBA/HHTP condensation with variable TCAT loading. (D) WAXS traces of COF-5 monomer with 15 equiv of TCAT loading over time. Having identified conditions that suppress COF-5 nucleation, we tested whether we could use TCAT in seeded growth experiments to enlarge existing 2D COF colloids while still suppressing the formation of new particles. First, we prepared COF-5 colloidal seeds by heating HHTP (2 mM) and PBBA (3 mM) to 70 °C in CH3CN:1,4-dioxane:mesitylene (80/16/4 v/v/v) for 24 h. Then, we transferred the nanoparticle solution into new vials and introduced solutions containing additional monomers with 15 equiv of TCAT (Figure A). By varying the monomer concentration, we were able to vary the molar equivalents of the monomers added relative to those present in the initial colloids from 0 to 4.5 equiv (equiv = [HHTP added]/[HHTP in the COF-5 seed solution]) while also maintaining a consistent dilution ratio of the COF seeds. For a fixed heating time of 48 h we monitored the (100) WAXS peak as a function of the amount of added monomer. The diffraction peak increased in intensity and sharpened, indicating that the size of the COF-5 crystalline domains increased during the seeded growth polymerizations (Figure B). This observation is consistent with dynamic light scattering (DLS) experiments, which show an increase in average particle size from 60 to 450 nm along with monomodal size distributions as a function of the amount of added monomer (Figure C). Monitoring seeded growth polymerizations as a function of reaction time showed an increase in crystallinity and particle size over the course of 2 days, after which no change was observed. For a fixed monomer addition of 4.5 equiv, the (100) WAXS peak intensifies and sharpens over the course of 48 h, meaning that both the amount of added monomer and the reaction time affect the crystallinity of the colloid nanoparticles (Figure D). DLS analysis provided monomodal distributions and a steady increase in the colloid size over time, which is consistent with the WAXS experiments and indicates that the growth process occurs over 48 h (Figure E). These findings demonstrate that TCAT both suppresses particle nucleation yet still permits the enlargement of preformed COF colloids.
Figure 3

Chemically controlled COF-5 colloid growth. (A) Schematic of COF-5 seeded growth with the addition of 15 equiv of TCAT. (B) WAXS traces of COF-5 particles as a function of the amount of added monomer after 48 h of heating. (C) DLS number-average size distributions of traces in part B. (D) WAXS traces of COF-5 particles with 4.5 equiv of monomer added as a function of the amount of time spent heating. (E) DLS number-average size distributions of traces in part D. (F) Nitrogen sorption isotherms recorded at 77 K and BET surface areas of COF-5 growth products in part A. (G) NLDFT incremental pore volume distributions of traces in part F.

Chemically controlled COF-5 colloid growth. (A) Schematic of COF-5 seeded growth with the addition of 15 equiv of TCAT. (B) WAXS traces of COF-5 particles as a function of the amount of added monomer after 48 h of heating. (C) DLS number-average size distributions of traces in part B. (D) WAXS traces of COF-5 particles with 4.5 equiv of monomer added as a function of the amount of time spent heating. (E) DLS number-average size distributions of traces in part D. (F) Nitrogen sorption isotherms recorded at 77 K and BET surface areas of COF-5 growth products in part A. (G) NLDFT incremental pore volume distributions of traces in part F. The seeded growth approach provides COF-5 samples with high materials quality, as judged by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (SBET) surface area. The colloids from the COF-5 growth experiments were collected via centrifugation, washed with clean solvent, and dried under vacuum overnight. Nitrogen sorption isotherms were collected and show that the COF-5 seeds have a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (SBET) surface area of 1740 m2 g–1. After a 48 h modulated growth with 15 equiv of TCAT and 1.1, 3.4, or 4.5 equiv of monomer added to the reaction mixtures, SBET increased to 1930, 1950, and 1990 m2 g–1, respectively (Figure F, Figure S19). In all cases SBET approached the theoretical Connolly surface area of 2000 m2 g–1 for COF-5.[19,32] Additionally, nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT) analysis indicated that all of the samples had narrow pore width distributions that are consistent with the expected pore size of 27 Å (Figure G). These observations indicate that the presence of TCAT does not disrupt the formation of high-quality samples of COF-5 with high surface area and uniform porosity. 1H NMR spectroscopy of components of the reaction mixture confirms that, despite being present in the polymerization mixture in large excess relative to the COF monomers, almost no TCAT is incorporated into the 2D COF product. To determine the amount of TCAT incorporated into the COF, we isolated the COF colloids, degraded them to soluble products in the presence of pinacol, and analyzed the relative amounts of HHTP and TCAT by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Figure S14 and Table S1).[26] Separately, the compositions of the soluble components of the polymerization mixture were also characterized. The 1H NMR spectrum of the postpolymerization solution was dominated by TCAT and contained very little HHTP (0.03:1.00 HHTP:TCAT ratio), further indicating that the polymerization is nearly complete after 48 h. In contrast, the COF-5 samples were dominated by HHTP and contained almost no TCAT (1.00:0.04 HHTP:TCAT ratio). The low TCAT incorporation suggests that TCAT does not introduce defects into the final 2D COF structure. We speculate that the small amount found in the COF samples corresponds to TCAT bound to dangling boronic esters at the edges of the particles, which is consistent with previous reports.[26] To gain mechanistic insight into how TCAT affects COF nucleation and growth processes, we employed kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations that have been previously developed to study the formation of COF-5 based on microscopic rate parameters.[33] By considering microscopic processes such as bond formation and breakage, the KMC model reproduces characteristics of experimental COF formation, including the rate orders of nucleation and growth.[21] Here, we modified the KMC model to study the early stage of nucleation by considering the oligomerization of HHTP and PBBA in the presence of TCAT. For these simulations we have excluded the more complex process of stacking among oligomers; as such, the simulation results should not be used to interpret those processes.[33,34] We first focused on the evolution of the average oligomer size in solution for different amounts of TCAT added to the monomer solutions (Figure A, Figure S22). TCAT slows the elongation of oligomers and limits them to small sizes, which is consistent with the SAXS/WAXS data (Figure , Figure S21). Excess TCAT molecules react with the PBBA units and prevent further growth of the oligomer when present, which decreases the average oligomer size (Figure S23). Likewise, the maximum oligomer size, which is relevant to the nucleation rate, also decreases as a function of added TCAT (Figure B). With 15 equiv of TCAT, the oligomers do not exceed 7 monomer units throughout the 60 min simulation. This size is close to the critical nucleus (in-plane) size (consisting of 6–7 monomers) found in our previous KMC simulations[33] and is consistent with the experimental observations of suppressed nucleation by 1H NMR and in situ X-ray scattering. This result indicates that TCAT prevents COF nucleation from occurring but favors the formation of small oligomers.
Figure 4

Kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of the oligomerization of HHTP and PBBA in the presence of variable TCAT loading. Evolution of (A) the average oligomer size and (B) the size of the largest oligomer (excluding TCAT units) as a function of time.

Kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of the oligomerization of HHTP and PBBA in the presence of variable TCAT loading. Evolution of (A) the average oligomer size and (B) the size of the largest oligomer (excluding TCAT units) as a function of time. Although it is not straightforward to use the present KMC model to simulate the growth of COF crystals in the presence of TCAT, the KMC results above, combined with previous theoretical analysis,[21] provide insight into the impact of TCAT on the COF growth process. Molecular dynamics simulations and reaction pathway analyses have shown that stacking both stabilizes the planar structure of 2D COFs and inhibits depolymerization.[30,35,36] In addition to limiting nucleation, TCAT can limit the relative rates of in-plane and out-of-plane growth, which control the shape and aspect ratios of the resulting COF nanoparticles. One possibility is that TCAT reacts with dangling boronic acid units in COF crystals and must be hydrolyzed or exchanged for HHTP to extend the lattice in-plane (Figure S23). This capping of boronic acids would be expected to influence the size and shape of the growing crystallites, since it would slow in-plane growth and the formation of new layers. Additionally, TCAT does not destabilize COF crystals by exchanging into the already formed boronate esters within the COF-5 lattice since bond breakage is prohibitive inside a crystal.[30] The high materials quality and low incorporation of TCAT into COF-5 are both consistent with the above conclusions (Figure F, Figure S14). Furthermore, no change in particle size or crystallinity was observed when COF colloids were heated in the presence of 15 equiv of TCAT for 48 h (Figures S3 and S10). These combined observations suggest that TCAT is only reactive with boronic acids in monomers, in oligomers, and at the edges of crystals and does not undergo transesterification with boronate esters in the layered COF structure. TEM analysis of COF-5 demonstrates that the particles grow anisotropically but are still highly crystalline with lattice fringes extending throughout the particles. TEM images of the COF-5 colloids used as seeds display layered particles that are approximately 50 nm in diameter, which matches the size measured by DLS (Figure A, Figure S2). These particles show the expected hexagonal lattice fringes, as made evident by the 6-fold symmetry in their fast Fourier transform (FFT) patterns. The COF-5 particles grown by adding 4.5 equiv of monomer and 15 equiv of TCAT ranged in size from 420 to 490 nm and were observed at random orientations on the TEM grid. Lattice-resolution images of the individual COF-5 particles show that they are highly crystalline with consistent lattice fringes that extend throughout the particles (Figure B). Consistent with our KMC analysis, images of the COF particles display that they are growing preferentially in the out-of-plane direction compared to the in-plane direction. For the particle shown, the fringe spacing is ∼27 Å (fitting d100 for COF-5) as measured by the FFT, which is consistent with the predicted lattice spacing for viewing the stacked particles from a side-on orientation (Figure C, Figures S28 and S29). The ability to control the preferred growth of COF colloids along a crystalline axis could enhance optoelectronic properties, such as exciton diffusion,[16,20] or enable anisotropic orientation of guest molecules. For these reasons, this oriented attachment growth mechanism warrants further TEM experiments as well as additional simulations to elucidate the microscale processes responsible for this anisotropic growth.
Figure 5

TEM characterization of COF-5 particles. (A) Low-magnification image of COF-5 seed particle. Inset: FFT of the image. (B) Lattice-resolution TEM image of a COF-5 particle grown from the seeds in part A by adding 4.5 equiv of monomer and 15 equiv of TCAT and heating the reaction for 48 h with consistent lattice fringes extending across the entire particle. (C) FFTs of the three color-coded regions of interest in part B. For additional TEM images at different added monomer equivalents see Figures S24–S28.

TEM characterization of COF-5 particles. (A) Low-magnification image of COF-5 seed particle. Inset: FFT of the image. (B) Lattice-resolution TEM image of a COF-5 particle grown from the seeds in part A by adding 4.5 equiv of monomer and 15 equiv of TCAT and heating the reaction for 48 h with consistent lattice fringes extending across the entire particle. (C) FFTs of the three color-coded regions of interest in part B. For additional TEM images at different added monomer equivalents see Figures S24–S28. With this understanding of the role that TCAT plays in COF-5 nucleation and growth mechanisms, we evaluated the generality of this modulated growth approach for other boronate ester-linked 2D COFs. We studied three other boronate ester-linked 2D COFs: TP-COF, DPB-COF, and COF-10 which are synthesized by the condensation of HHTP with 2,7-pyrenebis(boronic acid),[37] 4,4′-diphenylbutadiynebis(boronic acid),[38] and 4,4′-biphenylbis(boronic acid), respectively. TP-COF, DPB-COF, and COF-10 all exhibited similar nucleation suppression and colloid growth behavior as COF-5, with 15 equiv of TCAT suppressing nucleation for at least several hours (Figures S7 and S8). For all COFs, colloid seeds were first synthesized by heating HHTP (2 mM) and the corresponding boronic acid (3 mM) in CH3CN:1,4-dioxane:mesitylene (80/16/4 v/v/v) for 24 h at 70 °C. We then placed the COF colloid seeds in vials and instantaneously added 9 equiv of monomer and 15 equiv of TCAT. By monitoring the (100) WAXS peak (Q = 0.16 Å–1 for DPB-COF, Q = 0.19 Å–1 for TP-COF, and Q = 0.20 Å–1) as a function of the amount of time spent heating at 70 °C for a fixed monomer addition amount of 9 equiv, we observed that the (100) peak sharpened and increased in intensity, indicating that the added monomers attached to and increased the pre-existing COF colloid domains (Figure A–C). This conclusion is supported by DLS, which shows that the size distributions remained monomodal as the particle size increased. The DLS-measured average particle size of the TP-COF colloids shifts from 110 to 1400 nm after 8 h of heating (Figure D), that of DPB-COF from 90 to 260 nm after 4 h of heating (Figure E), and that of COF-10 from 110 to 800 nm after 8 h of heating (Figure F). Taken together, these results demonstrate that modulated growth conditions suppress nucleation, such that preformed COF colloids can be enlarged by increasing the amount of added monomers or the reaction time.
Figure 6

Chemically controlled colloid growth of other boronate ester-linked COFs. (A–C) WAXS traces of seeded growth products made from instantaneously adding 9 equiv of monomer and 15 equiv of TCAT to COF seeds as a function of the time spent heating for TP-COF (A, D), DPB-COF (B, E), and COF-10 (C, F), respectively. (D–F) DLS number-average size distributions of seed and final time point traces in parts A–C.

Chemically controlled colloid growth of other boronate ester-linked COFs. (A–C) WAXS traces of seeded growth products made from instantaneously adding 9 equiv of monomer and 15 equiv of TCAT to COF seeds as a function of the time spent heating for TP-COF (A, D), DPB-COF (B, E), and COF-10 (C, F), respectively. (D–F) DLS number-average size distributions of seed and final time point traces in parts A–C.

Safety Statement

No unexpected or unusually high safety hazards were encountered.

Conclusions

We have developed a chemically controlled approach to rapidly grow large, highly crystalline 2D COF colloids under operationally simple and scalable conditions. In situ X-ray scattering experiments demonstrate that a monofunctional additive, TCAT, suppresses colloid nucleation for longer than typical COF colloid polymerization times. By adding TCAT to preformed colloids in the presence of monomers, the size and the overall crystallinity of the pre-existing COF particles increase, as made evident by in situ X-ray scattering and DLS measurements. These findings are substantiated by KMC simulations that provide mechanistic insight into the role TCAT plays in the elongation of oligomers. By limiting the average oligomer size to below the critical nucleus size, nucleation is suppressed at high TCAT loading while crystal growth remains possible. However, the slowed in-plane expansion results in anisotropic COF growth, as made evident by TEM. Nitrogen sorption and diffraction measurements indicate that the grown colloids are of exceptionally high quality with minimal TCAT incorporation. We find that this chemically controlled nucleation and growth procedure is generalizable to four boronate ester-linked 2D COFs and hypothesize that the addition of a monofunctional modulator could be applied to more complex 2D COF systems and linkage chemistries. This method is beneficial for synthesizing solution-processable colloids where the size and aspect ratio can be manipulated in a controllable fashion. We anticipate that the mechanistic insight and operationally simple methods demonstrated here will enable the more efficient investigation of possible COF structures and study of their emergent properties for use in a variety of applications.
  29 in total

Review 1.  Rationally synthesized two-dimensional polymers.

Authors:  John W Colson; William R Dichtel
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 24.427

2.  Excited-State Dynamics in Fully Conjugated 2D Covalent Organic Frameworks.

Authors:  Andreas C Jakowetz; Ture F Hinrichsen; Laura Ascherl; Torben Sick; Mona Calik; Florian Auras; Dana D Medina; Richard H Friend; Akshay Rao; Thomas Bein
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Seeded growth of single-crystal two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks.

Authors:  Austin M Evans; Lucas R Parent; Nathan C Flanders; Ryan P Bisbey; Edon Vitaku; Matthew S Kirschner; Richard D Schaller; Lin X Chen; Nathan C Gianneschi; William R Dichtel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Role of Modulators in Controlling the Colloidal Stability and Polydispersity of the UiO-66 Metal-Organic Framework.

Authors:  William Morris; Shunzhi Wang; David Cho; Evelyn Auyeung; Peng Li; Omar K Farha; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 5.  Covalent organic frameworks based on Schiff-base chemistry: synthesis, properties and potential applications.

Authors:  José L Segura; María J Mancheño; Félix Zamora
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 54.564

6.  From Highly Crystalline to Outer Surface-Functionalized Covalent Organic Frameworks--A Modulation Approach.

Authors:  Mona Calik; Torben Sick; Mirjam Dogru; Markus Döblinger; Stefan Datz; Harald Budde; Achim Hartschuh; Florian Auras; Thomas Bein
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Superior Charge Storage and Power Density of a Conducting Polymer-Modified Covalent Organic Framework.

Authors:  Catherine R Mulzer; Luxi Shen; Ryan P Bisbey; James R McKone; Na Zhang; Héctor D Abruña; William R Dichtel
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 14.553

8.  Colloidal Covalent Organic Frameworks.

Authors:  Brian J Smith; Lucas R Parent; Anna C Overholts; Peter A Beaucage; Ryan P Bisbey; Anton D Chavez; Nicky Hwang; Chiwoo Park; Austin M Evans; Nathan C Gianneschi; William R Dichtel
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 14.553

9.  Conjugated organic framework with three-dimensionally ordered stable structure and delocalized π clouds.

Authors:  Jia Guo; Yanhong Xu; Shangbin Jin; Long Chen; Toshihiko Kaji; Yoshihito Honsho; Matthew A Addicoat; Jangbae Kim; Akinori Saeki; Hyotcherl Ihee; Shu Seki; Stephan Irle; Masahiro Hiramoto; Jia Gao; Donglin Jiang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Oriented Films of Conjugated 2D Covalent Organic Frameworks as Photocathodes for Water Splitting.

Authors:  Torben Sick; Alexander G Hufnagel; Jonathan Kampmann; Ilina Kondofersky; Mona Calik; Julian M Rotter; Austin Evans; Markus Döblinger; Simon Herbert; Kristina Peters; Daniel Böhm; Paul Knochel; Dana D Medina; Dina Fattakhova-Rohlfing; Thomas Bein
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  4 in total

1.  Applications of Dynamic Covalent Chemistry Concept towards Tailored Covalent Organic Framework Nanomaterials: A Review.

Authors:  Jiyun Hu; Suraj K Gupta; John Ozdemir; M Hassan Beyzavi
Journal:  ACS Appl Nano Mater       Date:  2020-07-02

Review 2.  Nanoscale covalent organic frameworks as theranostic platforms for oncotherapy: synthesis, functionalization, and applications.

Authors:  Qun Guan; Guang-Bo Wang; Le-Le Zhou; Wen-Yan Li; Yu-Bin Dong
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2020-07-16

3.  Covalent Organic Framework Nanoplates Enable Solution-Processed Crystalline Nanofilms for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Evolution.

Authors:  Liang Yao; Andrés Rodríguez-Camargo; Meng Xia; David Mücke; Roman Guntermann; Yongpeng Liu; Lars Grunenberg; Alberto Jiménez-Solano; Sebastian T Emmerling; Viola Duppel; Kevin Sivula; Thomas Bein; Haoyuan Qi; Ute Kaiser; Michael Grätzel; Bettina V Lotsch
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 16.383

4.  Solvothermal depolymerization and recrystallization of imine-linked two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks.

Authors:  Woojung Ji; Leslie S Hamachi; Anusree Natraj; Nathan C Flanders; Rebecca L Li; Lin X Chen; William R Dichtel
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 9.825

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.