Literature DB >> 3180635

Use of a pharmacologic indicator to compare compliance with tablets prescribed to be taken once, twice, or three times daily.

T Pullar1, A J Birtwell, P G Wiles, A Hay, M P Feely.   

Abstract

By use of an interview, return tablet count, and a pharmacologic indicator (low-dose phenobarbital), we compared compliance with tablets prescribed to be taken once, twice, or three times daily. One hundred seventy-nine patients with type II diabetes were randomly allocated to take one 2 mg phenobarbital tablet once, twice, or three times daily for 28 days. Phenobarbital level/dose ratios indicated that compliance was similar with once- and twice-daily regimens, and both were better than thrice-daily dosing. Mean return tablet counts suggested that compliance was best with the once-daily regimen; both twice- and thrice-daily regimens were similarly inferior. This difference between the techniques may be explained by the inadequacies of the residual tablet count, which identified only 13% of cases identified by phenobarbital. We conclude that compliance with the once-daily regimen was best, but that compliance with a twice-daily regimen was very similar, and both were superior to dosing three times a day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3180635     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1988.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  38 in total

Review 1.  Compliance with prescribed drugs: challenges for the elderly population.

Authors:  S Claesson; A Morrison; A I Wertheimer; M L Berger
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-12

2.  A comparison of a short half-life marker (low-dose isoniazid), a long half-life pharmacological indicator (low-dose phenobarbitone) and measurements of a controlled release 'therapeutic drug' (metoprolol, Metoros) in reflecting incomplete compliance by volunteers.

Authors:  E Hardy; S Kumar; S Peaker; M Feely; T Pullar
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Compliance in clinical trials.

Authors:  T Pullar; S Kumar; M Feely
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  From compliance to concordance in diabetes.

Authors:  J S Chatterjee
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 5.  [Adherence to neurologic treatment. Lessons from multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  S Kern; H Reichmann; T Ziemssen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Measurement of patient compliance and the interpretation of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  R Vander Stichele
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  More macrolides.

Authors:  M J Wood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-09-14

8.  Patient compliance.

Authors:  P A Meredith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-12-05

Review 9.  Assessing medication adherence in the elderly: which tools to use in clinical practice?

Authors:  Eric J MacLaughlin; Cynthia L Raehl; Angela K Treadway; Teresa L Sterling; Dennis P Zoller; Chester A Bond
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  The prediction of steady-state plasma phenobarbitone concentrations (following low-dose phenobarbitone) to refine its use as an indicator of compliance.

Authors:  T Pullar; S Kumar; H Chrystyn; P Rice; S Peaker; M Feely
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.