Literature DB >> 1777369

The prediction of steady-state plasma phenobarbitone concentrations (following low-dose phenobarbitone) to refine its use as an indicator of compliance.

T Pullar1, S Kumar, H Chrystyn, P Rice, S Peaker, M Feely.   

Abstract

1. A model for predicting the steady-state plasma concentration of phenobarbitone following low-dose phenobarbitone used as an indicator of compliance was derived using data for 10 healthy volunteers. 2. Each volunteer was given a single 30 mg oral dose of phenobarbitone and the pharmacokinetics were described. Subsequently, volunteers were given phenobarbitone 2 mg daily for 28 days and a further pharmacokinetic profile determined during and after this period. 3. An initial predicted estimate of steady-state plasma drug concentration was made using each volunteer's demographic details. This estimate was revised by Bayesian analysis using single timed samples (24, 48, 72 or 96 h) following the single dose. 4. The model was tested on a further 10 healthy volunteers given a single 8 mg dose and who were subsequently given 2 mg daily for 28 days. 5. The revised estimate of peak steady-state plasma phenobarbitone concentration utilising the 96 h post-single dose concentration (356 ng ml-1) was least biased (mean prediction error +/- 95% CI = 10.6 +/- 19.8 ng ml-1) and most precise (root mean square error +/- 95% CI = 28.3 +/- 19.0 ng ml-1). In all cases the peak or trough steady-state drug concentration was within 13% of the predicted value. 6. The model reflected compliance accurately in a further eight volunteers with simulated partial (two-thirds) compliance. 7. The use of a predictive model using Bayesian analysis to estimate expected steady-state plasma phenobarbitone concentrations could increase further the usefulness of low-dose phenobarbitone as an indicator of compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1777369      PMCID: PMC1368526          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1991.tb03907.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  14 in total

1.  Measurement of low (sub-therapeutic) phenobarbitone levels in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography: application to patient compliance studies.

Authors:  S Peaker; A C Mehta; S Kumar; M Feely
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1989-12-29

2.  Poor compliance is a major factor in unstable outpatient control of anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  S Kumar; J R Haigh; L E Rhodes; S Peaker; J A Davies; B E Roberts; M P Feely
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1989-09-29       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  Time to stop counting the tablets?

Authors:  T Pullar; S Kumar; H Tindall; M Feely
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Use of a pharmacological indicator to monitor compliance with thyroxine.

Authors:  N D Penn; S Peaker; A P Griffiths; M Feely; H Tindall
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Bioavailability of oral and intramuscular phenobarbital.

Authors:  C T Viswanathan; H E Booker; P G Welling
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1978 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 3.126

6.  Low-dose phenobarbitone as an indicator of compliance with drug therapy.

Authors:  M Feely; J Cooke; D Price; S Singleton; A Mehta; L Bradford; R Calvert
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Use of a pharmacologic indicator to compare compliance with tablets prescribed to be taken once, twice, or three times daily.

Authors:  T Pullar; A J Birtwell; P G Wiles; A Hay; M P Feely
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  The accuracy and stability of Bayesian theophylline predictions.

Authors:  H Chrystyn; J W Ellis; B A Mulley; M D Peake
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  The effect of low-dose phenobarbitone on three indices of hepatic microsomal enzyme induction.

Authors:  D E Price; A Mehta; B K Park; A Hay; M P Feely
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Measuring treatment compliance of men with non-gonococcal urethritis receiving oxytetracycline combined with low dose phenobarbitone.

Authors:  C J Bignell; F M Mulcahy; S Peaker; T Pullar; M P Feely
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1988-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  The odds of the three nons when an aptly prescribed medicine isn't working: non-compliance, non-absorption, non-response.

Authors:  John Urquhart
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Pharmacokinetically based estimation of patient compliance with oral anticancer chemotherapies: in silico evaluation.

Authors:  Emilie Hénin; Michel Tod; Véronique Trillet-Lenoir; Catherine Rioufol; Brigitte Tranchand; Pascal Girard
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Compliance with drug therapy.

Authors:  T Pullar
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.335

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.