Literature DB >> 31805979

Ages of hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence and life expectancy are associated with a UGT2B28 genomic variation.

Puo-Hsien Le1,2, Chia-Jung Kuo2, Yi-Chung Hsieh2, Tsung-Hsing Chen2, Chih-Lang Lin1,3,4, Chau-Ting Yeh5,6,7, Kung-Hao Liang8,9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive solid tumor. HCC occurred at younger and elder ages were considered driven by different oncogenic mechanisms, and they demonstrated distinct clinical courses.
METHODS: A total of 382 HCC patients treated by surgical resections was analyzed.
RESULTS: A univariate-multivariate analysis showed that viral etiology (chronic hepatitis B, C) and the UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 2 member B28 (UGT2B28) genomic variant rs2132039 were independently associated with the age at presentation of HCC (all adjusted P < 0.05). An extensive evaluations of clinicalpathological factors showed that the age (Odds ratio [OR], 1.016; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.001-1.032; adjusted P = 0.037) and ascites (OR, 3.505; CI, 1.358-9.048; adjusted P = 0.010) were two independent factors associated with this genomic variant. The age was 54.1 ± 14.6 years for patients with the "TT" variant type, and 58.2 ± 13.7 years for those with the "Non-TT" variant type. The age disparity was most prominent in alcoholic patients (OR, 1.079; CI, 1.035-1.125; P < 0.001, age of "TT", 49.6 ± 12.2; age of "non-TT", 59.3 ± 10.7). This genomic variant was also associated with age of recurrence (P = 0.025), distant metastasis (P = 0.024) and HCC-related death (P = 0.008) in non-censored patients.
CONCLUSIONS: An UGT2B28 genomic variant was indicative of the age of HCC presentation, recurrence, distant metastasis and death.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcoholism; Xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes; Young hepatocellular carcinoma; age of death

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31805979      PMCID: PMC6896495          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6409-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a prevalent malignancy with an age-standardized rates of 10.1 per 100,000 person-years in the world [1]. Patients diagnosed as early stages of HCC can be treated by curative methods such as surgical resection and liver transplantation [2, 3]. In contrast, patients in advanced stages were either due to delayed diagnosis, or failure of previous treatments. They can only be treated by palliative methods [2, 3]. Early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often lacks overt clinical symptoms [4], therefore, susceptible patients need to schedule regular surveillance ahead of time. Ultrasound and the alpha-fetoprotein levels are important surveillance tools which have demonstrated their effectiveness in enabling early HCC detection and in increasing life expectancy [3, 5–8]. However, the ages of HCC presentation is not homogeneous in different patient subgroups. Therefore, biomarkers indicating the starting ages of surveillance would have great clinical values. HCC occurred at younger and elder ages have been thought to have distinct oncogenic mechanisms [9] and possibly subsequent clinical course [10]. It was currently unknown how the age at presentation was related to genetics, despite the observation that different ethnic groups have different age of presentation [3]. Alcoholism, as well as the hepatitis B and C viral infections (HBV and HCV), are the major etiologies of HCC [11-19]. Treatments of viral infections have improve significantly in recent years. In chronic hepatitis B patients, the risk of HCC is positively related to serum HBV DNA levels [11, 20], and both of them can be substantially reduced by anti-HBV therapy [21, 22]. Besides, nationwide hepatitis B vaccination program has reduced HBV carrier rate significantly in Taiwan, a former HBV endemic region [23]. HCV infection is also one important etiology of HCC particularly in western countries [24]. Direct-acting antivirals can achieve 100% sustained virologic response rate [25-28], thereby reducing the risk of HCC [29]. As a result, alcohol-related HCC are more and more important, due to the reduction of relative importance of other etiologies. The UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 2 member B28 (UGT2B28) gene encodes an important xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme abundantly expressed in the human liver and kidney, and are responsible for the metabolisms of bile acids and sex hormones [30-33]. The copy number variations of UGT2B28 are associated with the risks of prostate cancers, esophageal squamous cell cancers, and colorectal cancers [34-37]. The genomic variant UGT2B28-rs2132039 and an adjacent copy number variation CNP605 have recently been reported to be associated with the natural history of chronic hepatitis B, particularly the e-antigen seroconversion [38]. The two adjacent genomic variants were surrogates of each other [38]. However, the role of UGT2B28 in the clinical course of liver diseases, particularly the occurrence of HCC, has not been studied to date. Thus, we investigated the relationship between UGT2B28-rs2132039 genomic variant and the clinicopathological features, particularly the age at presentation in early HCC patients.

Methods

Patients

A screening in the tissue bank of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linko, Taiwan, identified 451 early HCC patients who have their surgical tissues deposited. Among them, the tissues of 69 patients were no longer available. The remaining 382 HCC patients were then included in this study (Fig. 1). Most tumor characteristics of patients included and not included in this study were similar, except tumor sizes (Additional file 4: Table S1). After the genomic variants were detected from the non-tumor part of the 382 surgical tissues, relevant clinical data were retrospectively retrieved from the clinical charts, including the ages at the diagnosis of HCC, gender, liver cirrhosis, ascites, alcoholism (defined by an average alcohol consumption > 210 g per week in males or > 140 per week in females over at least a 2-year period with physical or psychological dependence), HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to HCV (anti-HCV), prothrombin time (PT), aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), bilirubin, albumin, creatinine, α-fetoprotein (AFP), tumor size, tumor number, capsule, tumor grade, macrovascular invasion and microvascular invasion. Patients with both HBsAg positivity and antibody anti-HCV positivity were considered as co-infection. We also analyzed the subsequent clinical events after the surgery, including local recurrence, distant metastasis and death, for a follow-up period of 49.2 ± 30.8 months.
Fig. 1

The flowchart of patient enrollment in this study

The flowchart of patient enrollment in this study

Genotyping of genomic variant

Fresh-frozen surgical tissues were thawed, and then the total DNA was extracted from the non-tumor part of these samples. The polymerase chain reaction method was then used for amplifying the DNA carrying the UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 2 member B28 (UGT2B28) rs2132039 genomic variant using the primers 5′-GAGGCTCCATCATAGTCTGGC-3′ and 5′-TTGCCTGGCTTCTCATTGTT-3′. The amplicon sequence was shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1. Conventional Sanger sequencing was then performed, and the base-calling was done on the sequencing trace files using the public-domain novoSNP bioinformatics tool [39]. Ambiguous calls which cannot be classified by the software were called by human curators.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were summarized as absolute numbers and percentages, and compared using the Chi-squared test. Continuous variables were summarized as median and range, and compared using Mann-Whitney test, or two-sample t-test with unequal variance. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by either linear, logistic or Cox regression. The results were shown as odd ratios (OR), hazard ratios (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and P values. The results were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference when P was less than 0.05. All statistical calculations were performed using SPSS software, version 21 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Evaluating clinical factors associated with age of HCC presentation

Table 1 summarizes the clinical variables of the patients included. The median age at HCC diagnosis was 58 years. The male to female ratio was 3.39. A total of 181 (47.4%) patients had the rs2132039-“TT” variant type, while 201 (52.6%) patients had the “Non-TT” variant type (Table 1). We first asked which clinical factors were associated with the age of HCC presentation. It was found that viral etiology (chronic hepatitis B, C) and the UGT2B28 rs2132039 genomic variant were independently associated with the age (all adjusted P < 0.05, Table 2).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of 382 HCC patients in this study

CharacteristicValues
Gender, male, n (%)295 (77.2%)
Age at diagnosis, years, median (range)58.0 (19.0–87.0)
Tumor number, median (range)1.0 (1.0–10.0)
Capsule, n (%)280 (73.3%)
Tumor grade, median (range)3.0 (1.0–4.0)
Macrovascular invasion, n (%)41 (10.7%)
Microvascular invasion, n (%)121 (31.7%)
Tumor size, cm, median (range)4.3 (0.7–20.0)
Cirrhosis, n (%)225 (58.9%)
Ascites, n (%)26 (6.8%)
HBV alone, n (%)228 (59.7%)
HCV alone, n (%)63 (16.5%)
HBV + HCV, n (%)36 (9.4%)
NBNC, n (%)55 (14.4%)
Alcoholism (%)97 (25.4%)
UGT2B28 rs2132039 TT, n (%)181 (47.4%)
UGT2B28 rs2132039 Non-TT, n (%)201 (52.6%)
Prothrombin time, second, median (rang)11.9 (9.0–19.5)
AST, U/L, median (range)37.0 (11.0–559.0)
ALT, U/L, median (range)39.0 (7.0–749.0)
Bilirubin, mg/dL, median (range)0.8 (0.3–15.3)
Albumin, g/dL, median (range)4.1 (1.7–5.1)
Creatinine, mg/dL, median (range)1.0 (0.4–15.4)
Alpha-fetoprotein, ng/mL, median (range)26.5 (1.0–685,353.0)
Recurrent, n (%)212 (55.5%)
Recurrent time, month, median (range)12.9 (1.0–114.7)
Metastasis, n (%)73 (19.1%)
Metastatic time, month, median (range)13.0 (1.0–99.2)
Death, n (%)47 (12.3%)
Survival time, month, median (range)22.5 (0.1–73.7)

Abbreviations: HBV Hepatitis B virus carrier, HCV Hepatitis C virus carrier, HBV + HCV Co-infection of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus, NBNC Non-hepatitis B/hepatitis C virus carrier, AST Aspartate aminotransferase, ALT Alanine aminotransferase

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis of clinical factors associated to the age at diagnosis

Univariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
slopeCI-lowCI-highPslopeCI-lowCI-highP
Gender, male−2.468−5.8840.9470.156
Etiology
 B−10.083−13.02−7.146< 0.001*−7.292−10.453−4.132< 0.001*
 C10.0616.94413.177< 0.001*6.4153.0649.766< 0.001*
 Alcoholism−2.482−5.7720.8080.139
Cirrhosis1.149−1.7684.0650.439
Ascites0.193−5.515.8950.947
AST, U/L−0.014− 0.0360.0070.194
ALT, U/L−0.016− 0.0340.0020.089
Tumor size, cm−0.240− 0.6020.1220.193
UGT2B28 rs2132039
 TT−4.106−6.952−1.260.005*−2.842−5.52−0.1640.038*

*P < 0.05

Baseline characteristics of 382 HCC patients in this study Abbreviations: HBV Hepatitis B virus carrier, HCV Hepatitis C virus carrier, HBV + HCV Co-infection of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus, NBNC Non-hepatitis B/hepatitis C virus carrier, AST Aspartate aminotransferase, ALT Alanine aminotransferase Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis of clinical factors associated to the age at diagnosis *P < 0.05 The fact that the genomic variant was associated with the age, independent of viral etiology, was particularly interesting. Therefore, we examined an extensive list of clinicalpathological variables for their associations with the genomic variant. The “TT” and “non-TT” counts does not have significant difference between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients (P = 0.307). The univariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR 1.021, 95% C.I. 1.006–1.036, P = 0.005), ascites (OR 3.223, 95% C.I. 1.264–8.215, P = 0.014) and hepatitis C infection (OR 1.839, 95% C.I. 1.148–2.945, P = 0.011) were associated with the genomic variant (Table 3). Multivariate analysis revealed that age (OR 1.016, 95% C.I. 1.001–1.032, P = 0.037) and ascites (OR 3.505, 95% C.I. 1.358–9.048, P = 0.010) were independently associated with the variant type (Table 3).
Table 3

Extensive evaluations of associations between the clinicopathological variables and the UGT2B28-rs2132039 variant types (i.e. the dependent variable, TT = 0, Non-TT = 1) using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis

CharacteristicOdds ratio95%CIP-value
Univariate analysis
 Gender, male0.8240.509–1.3340.431
 Age at diagnosis, years1.0211.006–1.0360.005*
 Tumor size, cm0.9810.932–1.0320.449
 Tumor number1.0840.886–1.3280.432
 Capsule1.0940.695–1.7210.699
 Tumor grade0.9400.698–1.2660.685
 Macrovascular invasion0.8420.440–1.6100.603
 Microvascular invasion0.7600.493–1.1700.212
 Cirrhosis1.0720.713–1.6130.737
 Ascites3.2231.264–8.2150.014*
 Alcoholism0.8450.533–1.3400.475
 HBV0.7100.458–1.1010.126
 HCV1.8391.148–2.9450.011*
 HBV + HCV1.2910.644–2.5880.471
 NBNC0.8480.479–1.5020.572
 Prothrombin time, second0.9380.811–1.0840.385
 AST, U/L1.0020.999–1.0050.246
 ALT, U/L1.0031.000–1.0050.095
 Bilirubin, mg/dL0.9600.808–1.1420.646
 Albumin, g/dL0.8200.572–1.1750.279
 Creatinine, mg/dL0.9760.790–1.2060.823
 Alpha-fetoprotein, ng/mL1.0001.000–1.0000.377
 Recurrent1.2080.806–1.8110.359
 Recurrent time, month0.9950.988–1.0010.113
 Metastasis0.6920.415–1.1560.160
 Metastatic time, month0.9980.991–1.0040.435
 Death0.7670.416–1.4140.395
 Survival time, month0.9980.992–1.0050.632
Multivariate analysis
 Age, years1.0161.001–1.0320.037*
 Ascites3.5051.358–9.0480.010*
 HCV1.6460.999–2.7130.050

Abbreviations: CI Confidence interval, HBV Hepatitis B virus carrier, HCV Hepatitis C virus carrier, HBV + HCV Co-infection of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus, NBNC Non-hepatitis B/hepatitis C virus carrier, AST Aspartate aminotransferase, ALT Alanine aminotransferase

*P < 0.05 were indicated as bold face with an asterisk

Extensive evaluations of associations between the clinicopathological variables and the UGT2B28-rs2132039 variant types (i.e. the dependent variable, TT = 0, Non-TT = 1) using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis Abbreviations: CI Confidence interval, HBV Hepatitis B virus carrier, HCV Hepatitis C virus carrier, HBV + HCV Co-infection of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus, NBNC Non-hepatitis B/hepatitis C virus carrier, AST Aspartate aminotransferase, ALT Alanine aminotransferase *P < 0.05 were indicated as bold face with an asterisk Subgroup analysis was then performed to further evaluate the relationship between the genomic variant and the age. It showed that the genomic variant was most tightly associated with age in alcoholic patients (OR 1.079, 95% C.I. 1.035–1.125, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2). A large effect size was observed that the age distributions were 59.3 ± 10.7 and 49.6 ± 12.2 years old in patients with “Non-TT” and “TT” variant types, respectively (Fig. 3a). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 71.6% when the genomic variant was classified by age (Fig. 3b). Apart from alcoholism, highly significant associations were also found in the subgroups of patients with AST > 37 U/L (OR 1.038, 95% C.I. 1.015–1.063, P = 0.001) and bilirubin > 0.8 mg/dL (OR 1.042, 95% C.I. 1.017–1.068, P = 0.001, Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

The forest plot of associations between the rs2132039 genomic variant and the age of HCC diagnosis in subgroups of patients stratified by extensive clinicopathological parameters. * indicates a statistically significant association when P < 0.05

Fig. 3

a The distribution of age of HCC diagnosis in the subgroup of patients with alcoholism. Red and blue dots represent the patients with rs2132039- “TT” variant type and “Non-TT” variant type respectively. The age of “TT”, 49.6 ± 12.2; the age of “non-TT”, 59.3 ± 10.7 (P < 0.001). b Receiver operating characteristic curve of the classification of rs2132039 genomic variant using ages. AUC, area under curve

The forest plot of associations between the rs2132039 genomic variant and the age of HCC diagnosis in subgroups of patients stratified by extensive clinicopathological parameters. * indicates a statistically significant association when P < 0.05 a The distribution of age of HCC diagnosis in the subgroup of patients with alcoholism. Red and blue dots represent the patients with rs2132039- “TT” variant type and “Non-TT” variant type respectively. The age of “TT”, 49.6 ± 12.2; the age of “non-TT”, 59.3 ± 10.7 (P < 0.001). b Receiver operating characteristic curve of the classification of rs2132039 genomic variant using ages. AUC, area under curve Similarly, the variant-ascites and variant-HCV associations in various subgroup was shown in Additional file 2: Figure S2 and Additional file 3: Figure S3.

UGT2B28 genomic variant was associated with age of recurrence, metastasis and death in non-censored patients

We then analyzed the subsequent clinical events after surgery, including local recurrence, distant metastasis and death in non-censored patients. Patients of the “TT” variant type had a younger age of recurrence (55.8 ± 14.6, N = 96) than those of the “Non-TT” variant type (60.3 ± 13.8, N = 116, P = 0.025, Fig. 4). Also, patients of the “TT” variant type had a younger age of distant metastasis (52.3 ± 15.0, N = 40) than those of the “Non-TT” variant type (60.0 ± 13.4, N = 33, P = 0.024). Among all patients, a total of 47 patients have complete follow-up information until death. Patients of the “TT” variant type had a significantly younger age of HCC-related death (52.2 ± 17.1, N = 25) than those of the “Non-TT” variant type (63.7 ± 11.0, N = 22, P = 0.008).
Fig. 4

The age distributions of HCC recurrence, metastasis and HCC-related death in patients with different variant types. Two-sample t-test with unequal variances were used

The age distributions of HCC recurrence, metastasis and HCC-related death in patients with different variant types. Two-sample t-test with unequal variances were used We also analyzed censored and non-censored data jointly. The UGT2B28-rs2132039-variant type was not associated with post-surgery time to recurrence, time to distant metastasis and death. However, among various subgroups (Additional file 5: Table S2), it was found that the “Non-TT” variant type was associated with higher cumulative incidence of recurrence in the patients with tumor size≦4.3 cm (HR 1.568, 95% CI 1.061–2.315, P = 0.024) and AFP≦26.5 ng/mL (HR 1.623; 95% CI 1.067–2.469, P = 0.024). The “Non-TT” variant type was associated with lower cumulative incidence of distant metastasis in the patients with tumor grade≦3 (HR 0.599, 95% CI 0.367–0.979, P = 0.041), microvascular invasion (HR 0.500, 95% CI 0.257–0.975, P = 0.042) and AFP >  26.5 ng/mL (HR 0.538; 95%CI 0.296–0.979, P = 0.043). The “Non-TT” variant type was associated with lower cumulative incidence of death in the patients with ascites (HR 0.058, 95% CI 0.006–0.523, P = 0.011) and albumin≦4.1 g/dL (HR 0.414; 95% CI 0.197–0.870, P = 0.020). The corresponding Kaplan-Meier plots of these subgroups of patients were shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 5

The Kaplan-Meier plots for the cumulative incidence of recurrence in patients of (a) smaller tumor size (≦4.3 cm) and (b) lower AFP level (≦26.5 ng/mL); for metastasis in patients of (c) lower tumor grade (≦3), (d) microvascular invasion and (e) higher AFP level (> 26.5 ng/mL); for death in patients with (f) ascites and (g) lower albumin level (≦4.1 g/dL). Green: patients with the variant type “TT”; Blue: patients with the variant type “Non-TT”

The Kaplan-Meier plots for the cumulative incidence of recurrence in patients of (a) smaller tumor size (≦4.3 cm) and (b) lower AFP level (≦26.5 ng/mL); for metastasis in patients of (c) lower tumor grade (≦3), (d) microvascular invasion and (e) higher AFP level (> 26.5 ng/mL); for death in patients with (f) ascites and (g) lower albumin level (≦4.1 g/dL). Green: patients with the variant type “TT”; Blue: patients with the variant type “Non-TT”

Discussion

In this study, we only analyzed patients in early HCC stages in the tissue bank, because those in advanced stages were either due to failure of previous treatments (such as surgical resections) or delayed diagnosis. For those with delayed diagnosis, the length of delay was not homogeneous in different people. One major goal of this study was to estimate the age of HCC presentation as early as possible, for the purpose of improving surveillance. The patients with delayed diagnosis may introduce uncontrolled variability to this study. Hence, we screened the tissue bank and identified 382 surgically treated HCC patients whose deposited tissues were available for this study, and other 69 patients whose tissues were no longer available. Clearly, the currently study was limited by the sample availability. A comparison of tumor characteristics showed that most tumor characteristics were similar, except tumor size (Additional file 4: Table S1). The tissue bank supported a wide diversity of clinical investigations, such as the immunohistochemical staining which usually requires tissues with decent sizes [40]. In our data, the tumor size does not associated with the age of presentation (Table 2) and the genomic variant (Table 3). Hence, we assumed the exclusion of the 69 patients did not affect greatly the conclusions of this research. The investigated genomic biomarker was significantly associated with the ages of HCC presentation, recurrence, distant metastasis and death. We conducted a scrutiny of the post-surgery clinical outcomes. The age disparity of the two variant types showed stronger statistical significance in death ages (P = 0.008, N = 47) than in recurrence ages (P = 0.025, N = 212, Fig. 4), despite the sample size was smaller. To explore the genomic effect in detail, we conducted an extensive subgroup analysis and discovered that (1) in the patients of smaller tumor size and lower AFP level, “Non-TT” variant type had higher cumulative incidence of recurrence; (2) in the patients of lower tumor grade, microvascular invasion and higher AFP level, “Non-TT” variant type had lower cumulative incidence of metastasis; (3) in the patients with ascites and lower albumin level (usually advanced cirrhosis), “Non-TT” variant type had lower cumulative incidence of death (Fig. 5). These observations could be generalized that the “Non-TT” variant type indicates better survival, compared with “TT” variant type, in the patients with more advanced HCC (ascites, lower albumin level, microvascular invasion and higher AFP level). The protective effect of “Non-TT” variant in subgroups of patients may contribute toward the more prominent difference in the age distribution of death. The UGT2B28 gene encodes a phase-two xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme which can transfer glucuronic acid from uridine diphosphoglucuronic acid to substrates such as bile acids, 5-beta-androstane 3-alpha, 17-beta-diol, estradiol, androsterone, eugenol [30-32], steroid hormones and lipid-soluble drugs [41]. Its role in bile acid metabolism may explain why the association was more prominent in patients with bilirubin > 0.8 mg/dL, and patients with heavy alcohol consumption. This study was limited by the lack of serum aflatoxin levels, a known liver toxin which has been shown to shorten the time of HCC occurrence in Taiwan and worldwide [42]. Aflatoxin was not routinely measured in patients with chronic liver disease in Taiwan, particularly when the patients already have disease-causing etiology identified such as viral infections and heavy alcohol consumptions. The quantitative aflatoxin measurements were largely missing in the clinical charts and thus were not analyzed.

Conclusion

Patients with UGT2B28-rs2132039 - TT variant type had an earlier presentation of HCC, earlier post-surgery recurrence, metastasis and HCC-related death. The mean age difference of HCC presentation was particularly large (~ 10 years) in alcoholic patients. Such information is helpful for formulating an effective surveillance strategy. Additional file 1: Figure S1. The theoretical amplicon sequence based on the human reference genome GRCh38.p7. Additional file 2: Figure S2. The forest plot of odds ratios of the rs2132039 genomic variant with respect to ascites in subgroups of patients stratified by clinicopathological parameters. * indicates a statistically significant association when P<0.05. Additional file 3: Figure S3. The forest plot of odds ratios of the rs2132039 genomic variant with respect to HCV infections in subgroups of patients stratified by clinicopathological parameters. * indicates a statistically significant association when P<0.05. Additional file 4: Table S1. Tumor characteristics of patients who have deposited their surgical tissues in the tissue bank. Additional file 5: Table S2. The univariate Cox regression analysis of subsequent events after the curative resection in various subgroups (Non-TT = 1, TT = 0).
  41 in total

1.  Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Associated with Early Tumor Detection and Improved Survival Among Patients with Cirrhosis in the US.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Sahil Mittal; Olutola A Yerokun; Chul Ahn; Jorge A Marrero; Adam C Yopp; Neehar D Parikh; Steve J Scaglione
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in Italian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  M Colombo; G Kuo; Q L Choo; M F Donato; E Del Ninno; M A Tommasini; N Dioguardi; M Houghton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-10-28       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Isolation and characterization of the UGT2B28 cDNA encoding a novel human steroid conjugating UDP-glucuronosyltransferase.

Authors:  E Lévesque ; D Turgeon; J S Carrier; V Montminy; M Beaulieu; A Bélanger
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis B virus. A prospective study of 22 707 men in Taiwan.

Authors:  R P Beasley; L Y Hwang; C C Lin; C S Chien
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-11-21       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Treatment with direct-acting antivirals for HCV decreases but does not eliminate the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Federico Piñero; Manuel Mendizabal; Ezequiel Ridruejo; Fernando Herz Wolff; Beatriz Ameigeiras; Margarita Anders; María Isabel Schinoni; Virginia Reggiardo; Ana Palazzo; María Videla; Cristina Alonso; Luisa Santos; Adriana Varón; Sebastián Figueroa; Cecilia Vistarini; Raúl Adrover; Nora Fernández; Daniela Perez; Federico Tanno; Nelia Hernández; Marcela Sixto; Silvia Borzi; Andres Bruno; Daniel Cocozzella; Alejandro Soza; Valeria Descalzi; Claudio Estepo; Alina Zerega; Alexandre de Araujo; Hugo Cheinquer; Marcelo Silva
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.828

Review 6.  Hepatocellular carcinoma in the setting of alcohol-related liver disease.

Authors:  Nathalie Ganne-Carrié; Pierre Nahon
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  The effect of copy number variation in the phase II detoxification genes UGT2B17 and UGT2B28 on colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Andrea Y Angstadt; Arthur Berg; Junjia Zhu; Paige Miller; Terryl J Hartman; Samuel M Lesko; Joshua E Muscat; Philip Lazarus; Carla J Gallagher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Randomized controlled trial of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Bo-Heng Zhang; Bing-Hui Yang; Zhao-You Tang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: open issues and future perspectives.

Authors:  Hee Bok Chae; Seon Mee Park; Sei Jin Youn
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-06-05

10.  Early detection, curative treatment, and survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Anjana Pillai; Jasmin Tiro
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hallmarks of glycogene expression and glycosylation pathways in squamous and adenocarcinoma cervical cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Martinez-Morales; Irene Morán Cruz; Lorena Roa-de la Cruz; Paola Maycotte; Juan Salvador Reyes Salinas; Victor Javier Vazquez Zamora; Claudia Teresita Gutierrez Quiroz; Alvaro Jose Montiel-Jarquin; Verónica Vallejo-Ruiz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 2.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.