| Literature DB >> 31805859 |
Peter Asaga Mac1,2, Axel Kroeger3, Philomena Ehi Airiohuodion4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nigeria is ranked second highest in the rate of road accidents and other emergencies (Deaths, disabilities) among 193 countries of the world. There is therefore the need for analyzing Emergency Medical Rescue Services (EMRS) in the country to identify options for improvement.Entities:
Keywords: Abuja; Delay times; Emergency medical rescue services (EMRS); FRSC; MAITAMA; NEMA; Road traffic injury (RTI)
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31805859 PMCID: PMC6896400 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-019-0291-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Emerg Med ISSN: 1471-227X
Resources and main services of the three institutions In Nigeria (2016). Equipment and staffing of Bay posts, ambulances and boats
| INST/ORG | FOUNDING | SERVICES | AMBULANCE | NO OF STAFF AND % GENDER DISTRIBUTION | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSC | 1988 | Road safety | ICU Buses | 19,000 | Female (35.3%) | Male (64.7%) |
| NEMA | 1999 | Disaster Mgt. | ICU Buses, Helicopters, Boats, motorbikes. | 700 | Female (35.3%) | Male (64.7%) |
| MAITAMA | 2001 | General health services. | . ICU Buses | 762 | Female (72.3%) | Male (27.7%) |
Resources of rescue services and capacity building (Information from heads of EMRS Organizations in Abuja)
| Item | FRSC | NEMA | MAITAMA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Call Centres | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| No of Ambulances & other vehicles. | 8 ICU Buses | ICU 8, Special ICU Vehicles 8, Helicopters 4, Boats, 10 | 7 ICU functional ambulances (21 grounded) |
| No. of Bay post | 13 | 10 | 0 |
| No. of staff per Bay post | 10 | 20 | 25(only at call Centre) |
| EMRS Basic equipment in ambulances | 7/8 | 30/30 | 7/7 |
| No. and % of trained staff/year | 1 (10%) | 6 (30%) | 4 (8%) |
| Staff with Trained skills in ACLS, ATLS | 5 (50%) | 7 (35%) | 4 (16). |
ACLS: Advance cardiac life support machine
ATLS: Advance trauma life support machine
BLS: Basic life support machine
ICU: Intensive care unit
Fig. 1The magnitude of medical emergencies and rescue results (document analysis)
EMRS and outcomes in two weeks observation period
| INSTITUTION | NO.OF CALLS PER DAY | TYPE OF EMERGENCY | TOTAL NO. OF EMRS | L IVES SAVED | DEATHS (%) | DISABILITY (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCD | RTI | OTHER | ||||||
| FRSC | 80–192 | 2 | 190 | – | 192 | 125 | 7 (3.6%) | 17 (8.9%) |
| NEMA | 50–87 | 84 | 3 | – | 87 | 75 | 7 (8%) | 5 (5.7%) |
| MAITAMA | 500–1107 | 707 | 400 | – | 1107 | 1027 | 46 (4.1%) | 110 (9.9%) |
| TOTAL | 1386 | 793 | 593 | 1386 | 1227 | 60 (4.8%) | 132 (10.8%) | |
*Case Fatality rate (CFR)
Response time (in minutes) from the event to rescue to clinical care in Abuja as measured during 14 days in each institution
| INSTITUTION | AMBULANCE TYPE | EMERGENCY TYPE NO.& GENDER OF VICTIMS | DEATHS | RESPONSE TIME (Average Mins). | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOTAL M F | |||||||
| FRSC (VR) | ICU BUS | RTA | 192 | 50 | 142 | 7 (3.6%) | 35(±7) |
| NEMA (VR) | ICU/SP.BOAT | NCD/RTA | 84 | 34 | 50 | 7 (8.3%) | 16(±7) |
| MAITAMA (VR) | ICU BUS | NCD/RTA | 1107 | 300 | 807 | 46 (4.2%) | 15(±7) |
*Case Fatality rate (CFR)
Fig. 2Opinions of users on EMRS services and “call delays”