Literature DB >> 31805241

Adjective Learning in Young Typically Developing Children and Children With Developmental Language Disorder: A Retrieval-Based Approach.

Laurence B Leonard1, Patricia Deevy1, Jeffrey D Karpicke2, Sharon Christ3, Christine Weber1, Justin B Kueser1, Eileen Haebig4.   

Abstract

Purpose There are strong retention benefits when learners frequently test themselves during the learning period. This practice of repeated retrieval has recently been applied successfully to children's word learning. In this study, we apply a repeated retrieval procedure to the learning of novel adjectives by preschool-age children with developmental language disorder (DLD) and their typically developing (TD) peers. We ask whether the benefits of retrieval extend to children's ability to apply the novel adjectives to newly introduced objects sharing the same characteristics as the objects used during the learning period. Method Fourteen children with DLD (M age = 62.64 months) and 13 TD children (M = 62.54 months) learned novel adjectives in 2 sessions. For each child, half of the adjectives were learned in a repeated spaced retrieval condition, and half were learned in a repeated study-only condition. Recall was assessed immediately after the second learning session and 1 week later. A recognition test was also administered at the 1-week mark. Results On the recall tests, for both groups of children, recall was better for adjectives learned in the repeated spaced retrieval condition. Adjectives learned by the 2nd day were retained 1 week later. Every adjective correctly applied to an object used during the learning period was also extended accurately to new objects with the same characteristics. On these recall tests, the children with DLD did not differ from the TD group in the number of items recalled, though their phonetic accuracy was lower. On the recognition test, the DLD group showed greater accuracy for adjectives that had been learned in the repeated spaced retrieval condition than for those learned in the repeated study condition, whereas the TD group performed at high levels in both conditions. Conclusion Repeated spaced retrieval appears to provide an effective boost to word learning. Because its benefits are seen even when a word must be extended to new objects, the application of this procedure seems well suited for learning new language material rather than being limited to item-specific memorization.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31805241      PMCID: PMC7201330          DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-19-0221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  50 in total

1.  The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition.

Authors:  Jan Edwards; Mary E Beckman; Benjamin Munson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Covert retrieval practice benefits retention as much as overt retrieval practice.

Authors:  Megan A Smith; Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Children with developmental language impairment have vocabulary deficits characterized by limited breadth and depth.

Authors:  Karla K McGregor; Jacob Oleson; Alison Bahnsen; Dawna Duff
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Interactive Book Reading to Accelerate Word Learning by Kindergarten Children With Specific Language Impairment: Identifying Adequate Progress and Successful Learning Patterns.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Rouzana Komesidou; Kandace K Fleming; Rebecca Swinburne Romine
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Phonological working memory impairments in children with specific language impairment: where does the problem lie?

Authors:  Mary Alt
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  Predicting vocabulary growth in children with and without specific language impairment: a longitudinal study from 2;6 to 21 years of age.

Authors:  Mabel L Rice; Lesa Hoffman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Frequency of input effects on word comprehension of children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  M L Rice; J B Oetting; J Marquis; J Bode; S Pae
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-02

8.  Early lexical acquisition in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  L B Leonard; R G Schwartz; K Chapman; L E Rowan; P A Prelock; B Terrell; A L Weiss; C Messick
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1982-12

9.  Characterizing the growth trajectories of language-impaired children between 7 and 11 years of age.

Authors:  James Law; J Bruce Tomblin; Xuyang Zhang
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Encoding Deficits Impede Word Learning and Memory in Adults With Developmental Language Disorders.

Authors:  Karla K McGregor; Katherine Gordon; Nichole Eden; Tim Arbisi-Kelm; Jacob Oleson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  9 in total

1.  Word-learning trajectories influence long-term recall in children with developmental language disorder and typical development.

Authors:  Justin B Kueser; Laurence B Leonard; Patricia Deevy; Eileen Haebig; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  The Role of Spontaneous Repetitions During Treatment of Morphosyntactic Forms for Children With Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  Katrina Nicholas; Elena Plante; Rebecca Gómez; Rebecca Vance
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Using Theory to Drive Intervention Efficacy: The Role of Dose Form in Interventions for Children with DLD.

Authors:  Pauline Frizelle; Cristina McKean
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  After Initial Retrieval Practice, More Retrieval Produces Better Retention Than More Study in the Word Learning of Children With Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Patricia Deevy; Jeffrey D Karpicke; Sharon L Christ; Justin B Kueser
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  A multi-study examination of the role of repeated spaced retrieval in the word learning of children with developmental language disorder.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Sharon L Christ; Patricia Deevy; Jeffrey D Karpicke; Christine Weber; Eileen Haebig; Justin B Kueser; Sofía Souto; Windi Krok
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 6.  Retrieval Practice and Word Learning in Children With Specific Language Impairment and Their Typically Developing Peers.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Patricia Deevy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Retrieval Practice Is Effective Regardless of Self-Reported Need for Cognition - Behavioral and Brain Imaging Evidence.

Authors:  Carola Wiklund-Hörnqvist; Sara Stillesjö; Micael Andersson; Bert Jonsson; Lars Nyberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-10

8.  Novel Adjective Processing in Preschool Children: Evidence From Event-Related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Katelyn L Gerwin; Laurence B Leonard; Jennifer Schumaker; Patricia Deevy; Eileen Haebig; Christine Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  The Neural Underpinnings of Processing Newly Taught Semantic Information: The Role of Retrieval Practice.

Authors:  Eileen Haebig; Laurence B Leonard; Patricia Deevy; Jennifer Schumaker; Jeffrey D Karpicke; Christine Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.297

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.