| Literature DB >> 31805178 |
Li Li1,2, Kangyu Wang1,2, Mingzhu Zhao1,2, Shaokun Li1, Yue Jiang1,2, Lei Zhu1,2, Jing Chen1,2, Yanfang Wang2,3, Chunyu Sun1,2, Ping Chen1,2, Jun Lei1,2, Meiping Zhang1,2, Yi Wang1,2,4.
Abstract
Ginseng is a valuable herb of traditional Chinese medicine and ginsenosides, the main bioactive components of ginseng, have been proven to have multiple functions in human therapies and health. Methyl jasmonate (MeJA) is an elicitor that has been demonstrated to have a vital influence on ginsenoside biosynthesis. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) has been widely used in quantification of gene expressions. Here, we report the selection and validation of reference genes desirable for normalization of gene expressions quantified by qRT-PCR in ginseng hairy roots treated with MeJA. Twelve reference genes were selected as candidate genes, and their expressions were quantified by qRT-PCR, and analyzed by geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper. CYP and EF-1α were shown to be the most stable reference genes in geNorm, CYP was the most stable reference gene in NormFinder, and 18S was the most stable reference gene in BestKeeper. On this basis, we further quantified the relative expression levels of four genes encoding key enzymes that are involved in ginsenoside biosynthesis using CYP and 18S as the reference genes, respectively. Moreover, correlation analysis was performed between the quantified expressions of four genes and the ginsenoside content in MeJA-treated ginseng hairy roots. The results of relative expressions of the four genes quantified using CYP as the reference gene and their significant correlations with the ginsenoside content were better than those using 18S as the reference gene. The CYP gene, hence, was concluded as the most desirable reference gene for quantification of the expressions of genes in MeJA-treated ginseng hairy roots. This finding, therefore, provides information useful for gene research in ginseng, particularly in MeJA-treated ginseng hairy roots, which includes identification and characterization of genes involved in ginsenoside biosynthesis.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31805178 PMCID: PMC6894815 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226168
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The content of ginsenosides in MeJA-treated ginseng hairy roots.
The content of ginsenosides in the samples at “0” h shown in the x-axes of the figures were the average content of ginsenosides in the samples collected at 6 h to 120 h from non-treated culture after MeJA treatment. The t-test was used to determine the difference of ginsenoside content between the MeJA treated samples and the average content of ginsenoside in the non-treated samples. “*” for a two-tailed significance of P ≤ 0.05, “**” for a two-tailed significance of P ≤ 0.01.
The content ratio of PPT-type ginsenosides to PPD-type ginsenosides at different time points in MeJA-treated ginseng hairy roots.
| 0 h | 6 h | 12 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 96 h | 120 h | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPD-type ginsenoside content (mg/g) | 1.292 | 1.195 | 1.537 | 2.954 | 5.449 | 7.701 | 7.547 | 8.319 |
| PPT-type ginsenoside content (mg/g) | 1.658 | 1.597 | 2.174 | 4.213 | 8.182 | 10.104 | 10.383 | 12.119 |
| The content ratio of PPT-type to PPD-type ginsenosides | 1.28 | 1.34 | 1.41 | 1.43 | 1.50 | 1.31 | 1.38 | 1.46 |
Fig 2The abundance of candidate reference genes.
Ct values of the candidate reference genes indicating their abundances in the samples.
Fig 3Stability analysis by geNorm.
(A) The optimal numbers of control genes for normalization. (B) Average expression stability values of the candidate reference genes. The smaller M value indicates the better suitability of the gene for qRT-PCR normalization.
The expression stability of the candidate reference genes determined by NormFinder.
| Gene | Stability value |
|---|---|
| 0.234 | |
| 0.255 | |
| 0.276 | |
| 0.305 | |
| 0.346 | |
| 0.360 | |
| 0.366 | |
| 0.372 | |
| 0.418 | |
| 0.432 | |
| 0.858 | |
| 0.909 |
The expression stability of the candidate reference genes determined by BestKeeper.
| N | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| std dev [± CP] | 1.25 | 1.63 | 1.88 | 1.86 | 1.96 | 1.93 | 1.96 | 2.06 | 2.00 | 2.01 | 1.93 | 1.98 |
| CV [% CP] | 7.92 | 6.68 | 6.72 | 6.98 | 9.22 | 7.45 | 7.39 | 6.63 | 7.30 | 8.04 | 7.21 | 7.27 |
| coeff. of corr. [r] | 0.87 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.89 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Fig 4The relative expression levels of key enzyme genes involved in ginsenoside biosynthesis under MeJA treatment with CYP or 18S as the reference gene.
(A) Relative expression levels of the four genes correlated with ginsenoside biosynthesis with CYP as the reference gene. (B) Relative expression levels of the four genes correlated with ginsenoside biosynthesis with 18S as the reference gene. The significance was calculated against the expression of no-treated hairy-roots by t-test. “*” for a two-tailed significance of P ≤ 0.05, “**” for a two-tailed significance of P ≤ 0.01.
Correlation analysis of key enzyme gene expressions with ginsenoside content in MeJA-treated ginseng hairy roots using CYP or 18S as the reference gene.
| Key enzyme genes | Reference genes | Rb1 | Rb2 | Rb3 | Rc | Rd | Re | Rf | Rg1 | Rg2 | Rh1 | Rh2 | F1 | F2 | PPD | PPT | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation Coefficient | .497 | .425 | .875 | .029 | .348 | .009 | ||||||||||||
| Sig. (2tailed) | .000 | .013 | .120 | .000 | .003 | .003 | .070 | .000 | .957 | .000 | .171 | .000 | .009 | .000 | .971 | .000 | ||
| Correlation Coefficient | .279 | .196 | .440 | .261 | .664 | .429 | .301 | .218 | .053 | |||||||||
| Sig. (2tailed) | .004 | .334 | .564 | .002 | .133 | .009 | .280 | .004 | .397 | .006 | .240 | .003 | .418 | .002 | .836 | .024 | ||
| Correlation Coefficient | .241 | .538 | .137 | .314 | .348 | .297 | .139 | .366 | ||||||||||
| Sig. (2tailed) | .019 | .003 | .474 | .016 | .058 | .599 | .003 | .011 | .544 | .023 | .171 | .031 | .264 | .581 | .135 | .009 | ||
| Correlation Coefficient | .329 | .490 | .565 | .377 | .467 | .005 | .370 | .468 | .486 | .295 | .395 | .337 | .279 | .117 | .363 | |||
| Sig. (2tailed) | .156 | .075 | .070 | .101 | .108 | .985 | .119 | .091 | .329 | .207 | .117 | .146 | .295 | .645 | .007 | .126 | ||
| Correlation Coefficient | .109 | .314 | .233 | .459 | .154 | |||||||||||||
| Sig. (2tailed) | .000 | .000 | .749 | .000 | .000 | .020 | .006 | .000 | .544 | .000 | .368 | .000 | .074 | .000 | .542 | .000 | ||
| Correlation Coefficient | .210 | .419 | .358 | .645 | .314 | .213 | .371 | .170 | ||||||||||
| Sig. (2tailed) | .002 | .039 | .536 | .001 | .006 | .094 | .132 | .005 | .544 | .003 | .411 | .002 | .158 | .004 | .499 | .002 | ||
| Correlation Coefficient | .464 | .505 | .213 | .033 | .051 | .657 | .328 | .450 | .121 | |||||||||
| Sig. (2tailed) | .020 | .095 | .031 | .035 | .078 | .411 | .892 | .037 | .156 | .020 | .198 | .008 | .080 | .037 | .633 | .047 | ||
| Correlation Coefficient | .141 | .015 | .433 | .180 | .099 | .130 | .139 | .284 | .086 | .110 | .135 | .214 | .009 | .117 | .263 | .095 | ||
| Sig. (2tailed) | .552 | .958 | .184 | .446 | .748 | .619 | .571 | .269 | .872 | .645 | .606 | .366 | .974 | .645 | .291 | .700 |
“*” for a two-tailed significance of P ≤ 0.05
“**” for a two-tailed significance of P ≤ 0.01