Literature DB >> 3180373

Prediction of defibrillation success from a single defibrillation threshold measurement with sequential pulses and two current pathways in humans.

D L Jones1, G J Klein, G M Guiraudon, A D Sharma, R Yee, M J Kallok.   

Abstract

The ultimate aim of defibrillation testing is to predict consistent defibrillation. This study tested the hypothesis that defibrillation success could be predicted from a single measurement of defibrillation threshold. We measured defibrillation threshold by using three patch electrodes and a standard protocol intraoperatively in 49 patients undergoing arrhythmia surgery. Each patient was then assigned to one of five energy subgroups (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, or 2.5 times defibrillation threshold) for a single shock (followed by a rescue shock if necessary) for a subsequent ventricular fibrillation episode. A curve relating percent success to energy was then constructed for the group. Defibrillation threshold averaged 4.7 +/- 2.98 J for the group (mean +/- SD). There was a curvilinear relation between the energy of the defibrillation threshold ratio test shock and percent success: 33.3%, 58.3%, 81.8%, 91.7%, and 100% at mean defibrillation threshold ratios of 0.56 +/- 0.14, 1.02 +/- 0.07, 1.53 +/- 0.14, 1.88 +/- 0.09, and 2.60 +/- 0.14, respectively. We conclude that consistent defibrillation is predictable from a single measurement of defibrillation threshold. Furthermore, for an individual patient, a safety margin of 2.6 times defibrillation threshold should approximate 100% successful defibrillation for a single test shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3180373     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.78.5.1144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  4 in total

1.  Electroporation induced by internal defibrillation shock with and without recovery in intact rabbit hearts.

Authors:  Yves T Wang; Igor R Efimov; Yuanna Cheng
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  The Ottawa Heart Institute: it's good, but can we afford it?

Authors:  P P Morgan; L Cohen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  [Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation].

Authors:  S Reek; R E Ideker
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

4.  [Influence of waveform and configuration of electrodes on the defibrillation threshold of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators].

Authors:  M Block; D Hammel; G Breithardt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.