Literature DB >> 31802397

Sex Differences in the Association of Family and Personal Income and Wealth with Fertility in the United States.

Rosemary L Hopcroft1.   

Abstract

Evolutionary theory predicts that social status and fertility will be positively related. It also predicts that the relationship between status and fertility will differ for men and women. This is particularly likely in modern societies given evidence that females face greater trade-offs between status and resource acquisition and fertility than males. This paper tests these hypotheses using newly released data from the 2014 wave of the Survey of Income and Program Participation by the US Census, which has the first complete measures of fertility and number of childbearing partners for a large, representative, national probability sample of men and women and also contains comprehensive measures of economic status as measured by personal and family resources, including income from all sources and all assets. Multivariate analyses show that personal income is positively associated with total fertility and number of childbearing unions for men only. For men, personal net worth is positively associated with number of childbearing unions; it is also positively associated with fertility for married men with a spouse present. These findings support evolutionary predictions of a positive relationship between status, access to mates, and reproductive success for males. Whereas personal income and personal net worth are negatively associated with total fertility and number of childbearing unions for women, family income (net of personal income) is positively associated with total fertility for women. For married men living with a spouse, family income (net of personal income) is negatively associated with total fertility. These findings are consistent with evolutionary theory given the existence of greater trade-offs between production and reproduction for women in an advanced industrial society. For women and men, family net worth (net of personal net worth) is negatively associated with number of childbearing unions and fertility. Implications are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fertility; Income; SIPP; Sex differences; Status; Wealth

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31802397     DOI: 10.1007/s12110-019-09354-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  25 in total

Review 1.  The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets.

Authors:  Thomas Lumley; Paula Diehr; Scott Emerson; Lu Chen
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 2.  Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis?

Authors:  S Philip Morgan
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2003-11

3.  American legacies and the variable life histories of women and men.

Authors:  D S Judge
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1995-12

4.  Does observed fertility maximize fitness among New Mexican men? : A test of an optimality model and a new theory of parental investment in the embodied capital of offspring.

Authors:  H S Kaplan; J B Lancaster; S E Johnson; J A Bock
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1995-12

5.  Natural selection on male wealth in humans.

Authors:  Daniel Nettle; Thomas V Pollet
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Socioeconomic status, marital status and childlessness in men and women: an analysis of census data from six countries.

Authors:  Martin Fieder; Susanne Huber; Fred L Bookstein
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2011-05-11

7.  An evolutionary account of status, power, and career in modern societies.

Authors:  Martin Fieder; Susanne Huber
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-06

8.  Socioeconomic status, education, and reproduction in modern women: an evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Susanne Huber; Fred L Bookstein; Martin Fieder
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.937

Review 9.  Wealth, fertility and adaptive behaviour in industrial populations.

Authors:  Gert Stulp; Louise Barrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  New Partners, More Kids: Multiple-Partner Fertility in the United States.

Authors:  Karen Benjamin Guzzo
Journal:  Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci       Date:  2014-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Sociodemographic Indicators of Birth Rate in a Low Fertility Country-A Nationwide Study of 310 Finnish Municipalities Covering > 5,000,000 Inhabitants.

Authors:  Petteri Oura
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.