Literature DB >> 18808363

Natural selection on male wealth in humans.

Daniel Nettle1, Thomas V Pollet.   

Abstract

Although genomic studies suggest that natural selection in humans is ongoing, the strength of selection acting on particular characteristics in human populations has rarely been measured. Positive selection on male wealth appears to be a recurrent feature of human agrarian and pastoralist societies, and there is some evidence of it in industrial populations, too. Here we investigate the strength of selection on male wealth, first in contemporary Britain using data from the National Child Development Study and then across seven other varied human societies. The British data show positive selection on male income driven by increased childlessness among low-income men but a negative association between personal income and reproductive success for women. Across cultures, selection gradients for male wealth are weakest in industrial countries and strongest in subsistence societies with extensive polygyny. Even the weakest selection gradients observed for male wealth in humans are as strong as or stronger than selection gradients reported from field studies of other species. Thus, selection on male wealth in contemporary humans appears to be ubiquitous and substantial in strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18808363     DOI: 10.1086/591690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  54 in total

1.  Personality and reproductive success in a high-fertility human population.

Authors:  Alexandra Alvergne; Markus Jokela; Virpi Lummaa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ecological variation in wealth-fertility relationships in Mongolia: the 'central theoretical problem of sociobiology' not a problem after all?

Authors:  Alexandra Alvergne; Virpi Lummaa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Low fertility increases descendant socioeconomic position but reduces long-term fitness in a modern post-industrial society.

Authors:  Anna Goodman; Ilona Koupil; David W Lawson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  An evolutionary account of status, power, and career in modern societies.

Authors:  Martin Fieder; Susanne Huber
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-06

5.  The primary parental investment in children in the contemporary USA is education : Testing the Trivers-Willard hypothesis of parental investment.

Authors:  Rosemary L Hopcroft; David O Martin
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-06

6.  Y-chromosome descent clusters and male differential reproductive success: young lineage expansions dominate Asian pastoral nomadic populations.

Authors:  Patricia Balaresque; Nicolas Poulet; Sylvain Cussat-Blanc; Patrice Gerard; Lluis Quintana-Murci; Evelyne Heyer; Mark A Jobling
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Constraints on the coevolution of contemporary human males and females.

Authors:  Stephen C Stearns; Diddahally R Govindaraju; Douglas Ewbank; Sean G Byars
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies.

Authors:  Monique Borgerhoff Mulder; Samuel Bowles; Tom Hertz; Adrian Bell; Jan Beise; Greg Clark; Ila Fazzio; Michael Gurven; Kim Hill; Paul L Hooper; William Irons; Hillard Kaplan; Donna Leonetti; Bobbi Low; Frank Marlowe; Richard McElreath; Suresh Naidu; David Nolin; Patrizio Piraino; Rob Quinlan; Eric Schniter; Rebecca Sear; Mary Shenk; Eric Alden Smith; Christopher von Rueden; Polly Wiessner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Optimizing Modern Family Size: Trade-offs between Fertility and the Economic Costs of Reproduction.

Authors:  David W Lawson; Ruth Mace
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2010-03-09

10.  How humans differ from other animals in their levels of morphological variation.

Authors:  Ann E McKellar; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.