| Literature DB >> 31801276 |
Michael Miles1, Biddut Bhattacharjee2, Nakul Sridhar1, Apresio Kefin Fajrial1, Kerri Ball2, Yung Cheng Lee1, Michael H B Stowell1,2, William M Old2, Xiaoyun Ding1.
Abstract
In recent years, microfluidic devices have become an important tool for use in lab-on-a-chip processes, including drug screening and delivery, bio-chemical reactions, sample preparation and analysis, chemotaxis, and separations. In many such processes, a flat cross-sectional concentration profile with uniform flow velocity across the channel is desired to achieve controlled and precise solute transport. This is often accommodated by the use of electroosmotic flow, however, it is not an ideal for many applications, particularly biomicrofluidics. Meanwhile, pressure-driven systems generally exhibit a parabolic cross-sectional concentration profile through a channel. We draw inspiration from finite element fluid dynamics simulations to design and fabricate a practical solution to achieving a flat solute concentration profile in a two-dimensional (2D) microfluidic channel. The channel possesses geometric features to passively flatten the solute profile before entering the defined region of interest in the microfluidic channel. An obviously flat solute profile across the channel is demonstrated in both simulation and experiment. This technology readily lends itself to many microfluidic applications which require controlled solute transport in pressure driven systems.Entities:
Keywords: flow control; flow profile; lab on a chip; microfluidics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31801276 PMCID: PMC6952922 DOI: 10.3390/mi10120839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1(a) Schematic of the microfluidic device—it shows dimensions and labels for the four primary regions: (1) Upstream region with varying depth (see the front view); (2) Midstream region with uniform cross-section (see the side view); (3) Downstream region; (4) Bonding region. (b) CAD rendering of the Curve microfluidic device. PDMS (Polydimethylsiloxane) = transparent; fluid domain = red; glass slide = grey. Scaled and labelled for illustrative purposes.
Figure 2(a) Schematic and (b) CAD rendering of the optical concentration measurement system. (c) Experimental setup. Photodiode array is right under the channel to detect the light from the top to measure phenol red concentration in upstream or downstream of the channel.
Figure 3(a) COMSOL Multiphysics simulations of Control (top) and Curve (bottom) channel designs, and (b) simulated z-averaged normalized concentration over time for both designs. Q = 460 µL/min.
Figure 4COMSOL Multiphysics simulations of Control (left) and Curve (right) channel designs at various time points. Q = 460 µL/min, z = 100 µm (mid-depth).
Figure 5(a) Flow experiments of Control (top) and Curve (bottom) channel designs, and (b) experimental z-averaged normalized concentration over time for both designs. (c) root-mean-square (RMS) deviation and flatness ratio for simulated and experimental data. Q = 460 µL/min.