Literature DB >> 31597972

Self-coalescing flows in microfluidics for pulse-shaped delivery of reagents.

Onur Gökçe1,2, Samuel Castonguay3, Yuksel Temiz1, Thomas Gervais4,5,6, Emmanuel Delamarche7.   

Abstract

Microfluidic systems can deliver portable point-of-care diagnostics without the need for external equipment or specialist operators, by integrating all reagents and manipulations required for a particular assay in one device1. A key approach is to deposit picogram quantities of dried reagents in microchannels with micrometre precision using specialized inkjet plotters2-5. This means that reagents can be stored for long periods of time and reconstituted spontaneously when adding a liquid sample. But it is challenging to carry out complex operations using multiple reagents, because shear flow enhances their dispersion and they tend to accumulate at moving liquid fronts, resulting in poor spatiotemporal control over the concentration profile of the reconstituted reagents6. One solution is to limit the rate of release of reagents into the liquid7-10. However, this requires the fine-tuning of different reagents, conditions and targeted operations, and cannot readily produce the complex, time-dependent multireagent concentration pulses required for sophisticated on-chip assays. Here we report and characterize a capillary flow phenomenon that we term self-coalescence, which is seen when a confined liquid with a stretched air-liquid interface is forced to 'zip' back onto itself in a microfluidic channel, thereby allowing reagent reconstitution with minimal dispersion. We provide a comprehensive framework that captures the physical underpinning of this effect. We also fabricate scalable, compact and passive microfluidic structures-'self-coalescence modules', or SCMs-that exploit and control this phenomenon in order to dissolve dried reagent deposits in aqueous solutions with precise spatiotemporal control. We show that SCMs can reconstitute multiple reagents so that they either undergo local reactions or are sequentially delivered in a flow of liquid. SCMs are easily fabricated in different materials, readily configured to enable different reagent manipulations, and readily combined with other microfluidic technologies, so should prove useful for assays, diagnostics, high-throughput screening and other technologies requiring efficient preparation and manipulation of small volumes of complex solutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31597972     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1635-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  1 in total

Review 1.  Spectral imaging and linear unmixing in light microscopy.

Authors:  Timo Zimmermann
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.635

  1 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Passive micropumping in microfluidics for point-of-care testing.

Authors:  Linfeng Xu; Anyang Wang; Xiangpeng Li; Kwang W Oh
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 2.  Lab-on-a-Chip Devices for Point-of-Care Medical Diagnostics.

Authors:  Sofia Arshavsky-Graham; Ester Segal
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.768

3.  Enzyme-Assisted Nucleic Acid Detection for Infectious Disease Diagnostics: Moving toward the Point-of-Care.

Authors:  Akkapol Suea-Ngam; Léonard Bezinge; Bogdan Mateescu; Philip D Howes; Andrew J deMello; Daniel A Richards
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 7.711

4.  Flattening of Diluted Species Profile via Passive Geometry in a Microfluidic Device.

Authors:  Michael Miles; Biddut Bhattacharjee; Nakul Sridhar; Apresio Kefin Fajrial; Kerri Ball; Yung Cheng Lee; Michael H B Stowell; William M Old; Xiaoyun Ding
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 5.  Simplifying the complex: accessible microfluidic solutions for contemporary processes within in vitro diagnostics.

Authors:  Nathan K Khosla; Jake M Lesinski; Monika Colombo; Léonard Bezinge; Andrew J deMello; Daniel A Richards
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 7.517

6.  Programmable hydraulic resistor for microfluidic chips using electrogate arrays.

Authors:  Marie L Salva; Yuksel Temiz; Marco Rocca; Yulieth C Arango; Christof M Niemeyer; Emmanuel Delamarche
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.