Lorenza Rimassa1, Tiziana Pressiani1, Philippe Merle2. 1. Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy. 2. Hepatology Unit, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Groupement Hospitalier Lyon Nord, Lyon, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) typically have poor survival outcomes. Until recently, sorafenib was the only systemic therapy option available and no agents were approved after sorafenib failure. However, rapid changes are beginning to emerge in the treatment landscape of advanced HCC, with approvals of regorafenib, nivolu-mab, lenvatinib, pembrolizumab, and cabozantinib and positive phase II/III clinical trial results with other agents. SUMMARY: Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical trial data of systemic agents that are currently approved for advanced HCC (sorafenib, regorafenib, and nivolumab), including agents recently approved in 2018 (lenvatinib, pembrolizumab, and cabozantinib) and those with recent positive phase II/III results (ramucirumab). Key features of the clinical trial design, including patient selection criteria, the use of biomarkers in HCC, and criteria for efficacy assessment, and their implications in real-world practice are discussed. Important ongoing and planned trials in advanced HCC are summarized to provide a glimpse into the future of advanced HCC treatment. From a physician's viewpoint, the treatment algorithms for advanced HCC are undergoing significant changes, as additional and imminent approvals impact the choices of first- and second-line treatment and decisions regarding the timing of therapy initiation. With these additional choices at hand, treatment sequencing remains a complex task and should take patient selection and tolerance profiles into account. KEY MESSAGES: The treatment of advanced HCC remains challenging and complex. The rapid developments in systemic therapy for advanced HCC should be considered when determining the best choice and sequence of treatment for patients with advanced HCC.
BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) typically have poor survival outcomes. Until recently, sorafenib was the only systemic therapy option available and no agents were approved after sorafenib failure. However, rapid changes are beginning to emerge in the treatment landscape of advanced HCC, with approvals of regorafenib, nivolu-mab, lenvatinib, pembrolizumab, and cabozantinib and positive phase II/III clinical trial results with other agents. SUMMARY: Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical trial data of systemic agents that are currently approved for advanced HCC (sorafenib, regorafenib, and nivolumab), including agents recently approved in 2018 (lenvatinib, pembrolizumab, and cabozantinib) and those with recent positive phase II/III results (ramucirumab). Key features of the clinical trial design, including patient selection criteria, the use of biomarkers in HCC, and criteria for efficacy assessment, and their implications in real-world practice are discussed. Important ongoing and planned trials in advanced HCC are summarized to provide a glimpse into the future of advanced HCC treatment. From a physician's viewpoint, the treatment algorithms for advanced HCC are undergoing significant changes, as additional and imminent approvals impact the choices of first- and second-line treatment and decisions regarding the timing of therapy initiation. With these additional choices at hand, treatment sequencing remains a complex task and should take patient selection and tolerance profiles into account. KEY MESSAGES: The treatment of advanced HCC remains challenging and complex. The rapid developments in systemic therapy for advanced HCC should be considered when determining the best choice and sequence of treatment for patients with advanced HCC.
Authors: Richard Jackson; Eftychia-Eirini Psarelli; Sarah Berhane; Harun Khan; Philip Johnson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jennifer L Spratlin; Roger B Cohen; Matthew Eadens; Lia Gore; D Ross Camidge; Sami Diab; Stephen Leong; Cindy O'Bryant; Laura Q M Chow; Natalie J Serkova; Neal J Meropol; Nancy L Lewis; E Gabriela Chiorean; Floyd Fox; Hagop Youssoufian; Eric K Rowinsky; S Gail Eckhardt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Josep M Llovet; Sergio Ricci; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Philip Hilgard; Edward Gane; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Andre Cosme de Oliveira; Armando Santoro; Jean-Luc Raoul; Alejandro Forner; Myron Schwartz; Camillo Porta; Stefan Zeuzem; Luigi Bolondi; Tim F Greten; Peter R Galle; Jean-François Seitz; Ivan Borbath; Dieter Häussinger; Tom Giannaris; Minghua Shan; Marius Moscovici; Dimitris Voliotis; Jordi Bruix Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrew X Zhu; Yoon-Koo Kang; Chia-Jui Yen; Richard S Finn; Peter R Galle; Josep M Llovet; Eric Assenat; Giovanni Brandi; Marc Pracht; Ho Yeong Lim; Kun-Ming Rau; Kenta Motomura; Izumi Ohno; Philippe Merle; Bruno Daniele; Dong Bok Shin; Guido Gerken; Christophe Borg; Jean-Baptiste Hiriart; Takuji Okusaka; Manabu Morimoto; Yanzhi Hsu; Paolo B Abada; Masatoshi Kudo Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Francesco Tovoli; Vincenzo Dadduzio; Stefania De Lorenzo; Lorenza Rimassa; Gianluca Masi; Massimo Iavarone; Fabio Marra; Ingrid Garajova; Maria Pia Brizzi; Bruno Daniele; Franco Trevisani; Carlo Messina; Francesco Di Clemente; Sara Pini; Giuseppe Cabibbo; Alessandro Granito; Mario Domenico Rizzato; Vittorina Zagonel; Giovanni Brandi; Tiziana Pressiani; Piera Federico; Caterina Vivaldi; Irene Bergna; Claudia Campani; Fabio Piscaglia Journal: Liver Cancer Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 11.740