| Literature DB >> 31798641 |
Deyin Zhang1, Xiaoxue Zhang1,2, Fadi Li1,2,3, Chong Li1, Yongfu La1, Futao Mo1, Guoze Li1, Yukun Zhang1, Xiaolong Li1, Qizhi Song1, Yuan Zhao1, Weimin Wang1.
Abstract
In the genetic improvement of livestock and poultry, residual feed intake (RFI) is an important economic trait. However, in sheep, the genetic regulatory mechanisms of RFI are unclear. In the present study, we measured the feed efficiency (FE)-related phenotypes of 137 male Hu lambs, and selected six lambs with very high (n = 3) and very low (n = 3) RFI values and analyzed their liver transcriptomes. A total of 101 differentially expressed genes were identified, of which 40 were upregulated and 61 were downregulated in the low-RFI group compared with that in the high-RFI group. The downregulated genes were mainly concentrated in immune function pathways, while the upregulated genes were mainly involved in energy metabolism pathways. Two differentially expressed genes, ADRA2A (encoding adrenoceptor alpha 2A) and RYR2 (ryanodine receptor 2), were selected as candidate genes for FE and subjected to single nucleotide polymorphism scanning and association analysis. Two synonymous mutations, ADRA2A g.1429 C > A and RYR2 g.1117 A > C, were detected, which were both significantly associated with the feed conversion rate. These findings provide a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating FE, and reveal key genes and genetic variants that could be used to genetically improve FE in sheep.Entities:
Keywords: differentially expressed gene; feed efficiency; residual feed intake; sheep; single nucleotide polymorphism
Year: 2019 PMID: 31798641 PMCID: PMC6878960 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Performance of the male Hu lambs used in RNA sequencing.
| High-RFI | Low-RFI | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 3 | 3 | |
| FCR (kg of FI/kg of BW gain) | 5.62 ± 0.38 | 3.92 ± 0.25 | 0.004 |
| RFI (kg/day) | 0.20 ± 0.02 | -0.25 ± 0.05 | 0.001 |
| FI (kg/day) | 1.48 ± 0.14 | 1.05 ± 0.13 | 0.019 |
| ADG (kg/day) | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.827 |
| Initial BW (kg) | 25.43 ± 3.75 | 25.76 ± 2.09 | 0.900 |
| Final BW (kg) | 38.60 ± 4.35 | 39.10 ± 2.69 | 0.875 |
| Metabolic BW (kg0.75) | 13.44 ± 1.28 | 13.59 ± 0.74 | 0.878 |
| BW before slaughter (kg) | 41.18 ± 4.06 | 42.36 ± 1.98 | 0.678 |
RFI, residual feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio; FI, average daily feed intake over the assessed feeding period; ADG, average daily gain over the assessed feeding period; BW, body weight. P-value as calculated by a t-test.
Descriptive statistics of all the experimental animals.
| Trait | N | Min | Max | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCR (kg of FI/kg of BW gain) | 137 | 3.63 | 7.09 | 4.90 | 0.59 |
| RFI (kg/day) | 137 | -0.31 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.09 |
| FI (kg/day) | 137 | 0.72 | 1.72 | 1.22 | 0.18 |
| ADG (kg/day) | 137 | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 0.03 |
| Initial BW (kg) | 125 | 1.42 | 18.99 | 2.75 | 1.55 |
| Final BW (kg) | 137 | 15.15 | 36.70 | 24.72 | 3.95 |
| Metabolic BW (kg0.75) | 137 | 9.82 | 16.89 | 13.11 | 1.33 |
| BW before slaughter (kg) | 137 | 29.15 | 53.20 | 40.37 | 4.48 |
FCR, feed conversion ratio; RFI, residual feed intake; FI, average daily feed intake over the assessed feeding period; ADG, average daily gain over the assessed feeding period; BW, body weight.
Figure 1Chart of the expression correlation between samples. Data for six samples, comprising three samples with very high-RFI values and three samples with very low-RFI values, are presented. The horizontal coordinate of the correlation coefficient between samples is log10(FPKM+1) of sample 1, the ordinate is log10(FPKM+1) of sample 2, and R2 is the square of Pearson's correlation coefficient. FPKM—fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped.
Top 20 liver DEGs between male Hu lambs with low- and high-RFI values.
| Gene | FPKM | Log2(FC) | q-value | Full name | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-RFI | High-RFI | ||||
| SPP1 | 3.43 | 0.33 | 3.38 | 1.53E-02 | Secreted phosphoprotein 1 |
| WNT2B | 4.25 | 0.70 | 2.59 | 8.28E-03 | Wnt family member 2B |
| FCGBP | 1.19 | 0.25 | 2.22 | 8.28E-03 | Fc fragment of IgG binding protein |
| ACTG2 | 3.39 | 0.89 | 1.92 | 8.28E-03 | Actin, gamma 2, smooth muscle |
| SLITRK4 | 1.41 | 0.38 | 1.88 | 4.38E-02 | SLIT and NTRK-like family, member 4 |
| RUNDC3B | 8.73 | 2.41 | 1.86 | 8.28E-03 | RUN domain containing 3B |
| NEXN | 1.96 | 0.55 | 1.82 | 8.28E-03 | Nexilin |
| SHISA3 | 0.87 | 0.25 | 1.81 | 2.67E-02 | Shisa family member 3 |
| ME1 | 8.48 | 2.43 | 1.81 | 8.28E-03 | Malic enzyme 1 |
| PPARGC1A | 20.99 | 6.41 | 1.71 | 8.28E-03 | PPARG coactivator 1 alpha |
| ADRA2A | 0.65 | 5.21 | -2.99 | 8.28E-03 | Adrenoceptor alpha 2A |
| NRCAM | 0.59 | 3.06 | -2.38 | 8.28E-03 | Neuronal cell adhesion molecule |
| WWC1 | 11.02 | 57.49 | -2.38 | 8.28E-03 | WW and C2 domain containing 1 |
| TNC | 28.68 | 149.08 | -2.38 | 8.28E-03 | Tenascin C |
| RFC3 | 0.36 | 1.80 | -2.30 | 8.28E-03 | Replication factor C subunit 3 |
| DIRAS3 | 3.84 | 18.61 | -2.28 | 8.28E-03 | DIRAS family gtpase 3 |
| IL1R2 | 2.39 | 11.14 | -2.22 | 8.28E-03 | Interleukin 1 receptor |
| TCAF2 | 3.40 | 15.43 | -2.18 | 8.28E-03 | TRPM8 channel-associated factor 2 |
| PTGER3 | 1.29 | 5.47 | -2.08 | 2.16E-02 | Prostaglandin E receptor 3 |
| RIMS1 | 0.61 | 2.34 | -1.94 | 2.16E-02 | Regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis 1 |
DEG, differentially expressed gene; RFI, residual feed intake; Log2FC, log2(low-RFI/high-RFI); FPKM, fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped.
Figure 2Validation of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). The qRT-PCR measurements of the expression of RFC3, ADRA2A, WWC1, SPP1, and FCGBP mRNA transcripts were analyzed using the ΔΔCt method; *significant difference between the high-RFI and low-RFI groups (P < 0.05), **very significant difference between the high-RFI and low-RFI groups (P < 0.01).
Figure 3Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) classification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the high- and low-RFI groups. (A): Upregulated genes; (B): Downregulated genes.
Figure 4Sequencing peak images for ovine ADRA2A (A) and RYR2 (B) genes.
Figure 5Genotyping of ovine ADRA2A g.1429 C > A (A) and RYR2 g.1117 A > C (B) mutations using Kaspar technology. Note: The red, green, and blue dots represent the three genotypes, respectively; while the purple dots indicate genotyping failure.
Association analysis of ovine ADRA2A g.1429 C > A and RYR2 g.1117 A > C single nucleotide polymorphisms in the experimental population.
| Gene/loci | Genotype | No. | FCR |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| CC | 37 | 4.67 ± 0.69B |
| CA | 215 | 5.18 ± 0.92A | |
| AA | 309 | 5.14 ± 0.93A | |
|
| CC | 327 | 5.13 ± 0.56b |
| CA | 207 | 5.08 ± 0.65b | |
| AA | 27 | 5.46 ± 0.66a |
Feed conversion rate (FCR) is indicated by the mean + SD. In the same column, there were significant differences between numerical data labeled with different lowercase letters (P < 0.05), and between data labeled with different capital letters (P < 0.01).