| Literature DB >> 31798349 |
Yun Wei1,2, Wan-Jie Yang1,2, Qi-Jun Wang3, Peng-Cheng Lin4, Jian-Yuan Zhao1,2, Wei Xu1,2, Shi-Min Zhao1,2,4, Xia-Di He1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lysine post-translational modifications are important regulators of protein function. Proteomic and biochemical approaches have resulted in identification of several lysine modifications, including acetylation, crotonylation, and succinylation. Here, we developed an approach for surveying amide-bonded lysine modifications in the proteome of human tissues/cells based on the observation that many lysine modifications are amide-bonded and that the Salmonella enterica deacetylase, CobB, is an amidase.Entities:
Keywords: CobB deacetylase; Lysine post-translational modification; Proteome
Year: 2019 PMID: 31798349 PMCID: PMC6885319 DOI: 10.1186/s12575-019-0109-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Proced Online ISSN: 1480-9222 Impact factor: 3.244
Fig. 1CobB is an amidase. The abilities of CobB to cleave synthetic propionylated, succinylated, crotonylated and acetylated peptides were tested. The M/Z values of synthetic (left each group) and cleaved (right each group) peptides were determined by mass spectrometry and marked
Fig. 2Flow chat of cell-wide survey for amide-bonded lysine modifications. Lysates were obtained and depleted for non-covalently bound metabolites, amide-bonded modifiers were released with CobB and detected with GC/UPLC-MS
Fig. 3An example flow chat of how a positive identification (asparagine) was obtained. A GC peak at certain retention time (19.498 min) is generated by CobB treatment (1), the MS/MS spectrum of the 19.498 min peak generated by CobB treatment (2), Searching against NIST library identified that the metabolite of 19.498 min peak was asparagine (3), the standard asparagine generate the same GC retention time and MS/MS spectrum as the metabolite generated by CobB treatment (4)
Comparison with other methods
| Advantage | Disadvantage | |
|---|---|---|
| Our method | 1. Multiple modifications identification 2. Known the demodification enzyme | 1. Only amide-bond lysine modifications 2. Higher false positive ratio 3. More expertise needed |
1. Lower false positive ratio 2. Less expertise needed | 1. Only amide-bond lysine modifications 2. One modification identification 3. Unkown the demodification enzyme | |
1. Lower false positive ratio 2. Less expertise needed | 1. Only amide-bond lysinemodifications 2. One modification identification 3. Unkown the demodification enzyme |
Quantification of targeted lysine modifications TIMING: 3–4 days for each run
| 1. Synthesize peptides containing targeted lysine modifications as internal calibrators. | |
| ▲CRITICAL The purity of the synthetic peptides should be greater than 98% to ensure accurate quantification. | |
| 2. Mix known concentrations of synthetic peptide into samples to be analyzed. | |
| 3. Run samples with known synthetic peptides and samples without synthetic peptides through steps 1–54. | |
| 4. Compare the areas of GC or LC peaks of the targeted modifiers in these samples. | |
| 5. Calculate the levels of modifications in these samples by comparing with the internal peptide calibrator. | |
| 6. Alternatively, obtain a working curve by running various levels of synthetic peptides through steps 1–54, and compare areas of GC or LC peaks of samples with the working curve. |
Reaction system for demodification by CobB TIMING: 0.5 h
| The demodification reactions were carried out in a 600 μl reaction mix contains: | |
|---|---|
| Reagent name | Amount |
| pH 7.5 HEPES buffer (500 mM) | 60 μl |
| DTT (100 mM) | 6 μl |
| MgCl2 (600 mM) | 6 μl |
| NAD+ (100 mM) | 6 μl |
| Substrate proteome (10 μg/ml) | 300 μl |
| CobB (5 mg/ml) | 50 μl |
| PMSF (100 mM) | 0.3 μl |
| ddH2O | Up to 600 μl |
Preparation of recombinant CobB TIMING: 2 days
| 1. Clone the | |
| 2. Introduce the constructed expression plasmid into | |
| 3. Grown the transformed cells at 37 °C in LB medium containing 50 μg/mL ampicillin. | |
| 4. Add IPTG to a final concentration of 1.0 mM when the optical density at 600 nm of the culture reaches 0.6–0.8. | |
| 5. Keep the IPTG-induced cells growing for 6 h. Then, harvest the cells by centrifugation at 800× | |
| ■PAUSE POINT The harvested cells can be stored at − 20 °C for weeks before further processing. | |
| 6. Disrupt the cells using an ultra-high pressure continuous flow cell disrupter in ice-cold 1× PBS containing 1 mM PMSF and 0.5 mM DTT. | |
| ! CAUTION PMSF is highly toxic; handle with caution. | |
| 7. Remove cell debris by centrifugation at 21,000× | |
| 8. Load the supernatant (10 mL) onto a Nickel resin column, and process the column with the | |
| 9. Wash the bound protein with 10 volumes of binding buffer, and elute the proteins using elution buffer. | |
| 10. Desalt the proteins using gel chromatography with desalination buffer. | |
| 11. Check the purity of the proteins using SDS-PAGE before storing at − 80 °C. |
LC/MS settings
| 1. HPLC elution solvents | |
| The anionic ion-pair reagent HFBA was added to the mobile phase to improve analyte interactions with the stationary phase. An aqueous solution of HFBA (approximately 0.5 M) was diluted in water (mobile phase A) and methanol (mobile phase B) to a final concentration of 0.5 mM. | |
| 2. Gradient system (pair of two alternating columns) | |
| The gradient system used two identical columns (Agilent Zorbax SB-C18; 2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.8 μm; Waldbronn, Germany) connected to a 10-port two-position switching valve. Using the column switching valve and a second binary pump, the two columns were applied alternately. When one column was used for the analytical gradient, the other column was cleaned and re-equilibrated. From the prepared samples, 5 μL was injected into the HPLC system. The analytical gradient (pump 1; flow rate: 0.5 mL/min) increased linearly from 10% B to 50% B within 11 min. After isocratic elution for 0.5 min, the gradient returned to starting conditions until 11.6 min, and isocratic flow was performed for 10% B from 11.6 to 12.5 min at 0.5 mL/min. This short return of pump 1 to starting conditions was necessary for flushing the tubing from the pump to switching valve before the freshly equilibrated second column was switched in for the next injection. Parallel to the analytical gradient, the other column was cleaned and equilibrated by pump 2; within 1.0 min, the gradient was increased from 10% B to 95% B. The isocratic flow of 95% B was held for 4.5 min. From 5.5 to 6.5 min, initial conditions of the analytical gradient (10% B) were achieved and retained at isocratic flow until 12.5 min for flushing and equilibrating the column. Total time from injection to injection was 13.3 min (including the autosampler operation time of 0.8 min). |
GC/MS settings
| ▲CRITICAL Prior to GC-MS analysis, ensure that the instrument has been optimized. Details for our GC/MS workflow are listed below. Please be aware that other GC/MS methods with sufficient sensitivity, reproducibility, and linearity for the metabolites of interest can be used. | |
| 1. Connect an Agilent 5977B Mass Spectrometer to an Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph. Use 5977MS/Enhanced MassHunter software to control the GC/MS system. | |
| GC settings: | |
| Column: Agilent 19091S-433HP-5MS 5% Phenyl Methyl Silox 325 °C: 29.8 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm | |
| Carrier gas: helium (> 99.999% purity) | |
| Carrier gas flow rate: 1 mL/min | |
| Oven temperature program: 100 °C for 3 min, increase the temperature by 10 °C/min to 140 °C, increase the temperature by 8 °C/min to 260 °C, increase the temperature by 10 °C/min to 310 °C, and hold at this temperature for 5 min. | |
| Injection port temperature: 280 °C | |
| Transfer line temperature: 250 °C | |
| Injection volume: 1 μL | |
| Mode: splitless | |
| MS settings: | |
| Ionization mode: electron ionization (EI) mode | |
| Electron energy: 70 eV | |
| Ion source temperature: 250 °C | |
| Scan frequency: 2.7/s | |
| Mass range: 50.00–600.00 | |
| 2. Place the samples in the auto sampler tray for GC/MS analysis. | |
| 3. Create a sample list (or sequence list) that includes the metabolomic sample details. | |
| 4. Inject the pyridine standard at the beginning and the end of the sample analysis sequence. |
| Step | Problem | Possible reason | solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | Tight pellet forming | High centrifugation speed or sticky pellet | Vortex to disperse pellet before further washing |
| 33 | Mild turbidity | Incomplete dissolving of denatured proteins | Centrifuge to remove |
| 45 | Unsteady ion response | Ion source parameters not optimized; unstable liquid flow | Optimize ion source parameters; check UPLC and connected systems for leaks |
| 45 | High noise levels (chemical/electronic) | Detector damaged and producing discharges | Arrange engineer visit |
| 45, 50 | Poor chromatographic peak shape | Column degradation or contamination | Replace the GC/UPLC column |
| 45, 50 | Carryover | The sample is too concentrated | Optimize injection volume and concentrate components in sample |
| 45, 50 | High mass spectrometer pressure | Gas infusion room atmosphere | Work through connections on MS for gas-tight seals; arrange engineer visit |
| 50 | Unstable GC gas flow or pressure | Leak in GC system | Work through connections on GC to check for gas-tight seals |
| 50 | Unsteady baseline | Detector or electronics fault | Arrange engineer visit |
| 50 | Absence or low number of peaks in all samples | Incomplete vacuum drying in step 40; failed injection | Ensure that the samples have been completely dried in step 40; re-inject the sample |
| 53 | Low number of positive hits | Low purity and activity of CobB | Preparation of recombinant CobB with high purity and activity |
| 53 | High amino acid intensity detected in the untreated samples (cell lysates alone/CobB alone) | Incomplete removing of non-covalently bonded small molecules from cell proteome/CobB | Repeat steps 29–30 more times; preparation of recombinant CobB with high purity |