Faisal S Malik1, Jeanette M Stafford2, Beth A Reboussin2, Georgeanna J Klingensmith3, Dana Dabelea4, Jean M Lawrence5, Elizabeth Mayer-Davis6, Sharon Saydah7, Sarah Corathers8, Catherine Pihoker1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 3. Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado. 5. Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California. 6. Department of Nutrition and Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 7. Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Georgia. 8. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to: (a) assess the prevalence of diabetes complications and comorbidities screening as recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) for youth and young adults (YYAs) with type 1 diabetes (T1D), (b) examine the association of previously measured metabolic status related to diabetes complications with receipt of recommended clinical screening, and (c) examine the association of satisfaction with diabetes care with receipt of recommended clinical screening. METHODS: The study included 2172 SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth participants with T1D (>10 years old, diabetes duration >5 years). Mean participant age was 17.7 ± 4.3 years with a diabetes duration of 8.1 ± 1.9 years. Linear and multinomial regression models were used to evaluate associations. RESULTS: Sixty percent of participants reported having three or more hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurements in the past year. In terms of diabetes complications screening, 93% reported having blood pressure measured, 81% having an eye examination, 71% having lipid levels checked, 64% having a foot exam, and 63% completing albuminuria screening in accordance with ADA recommendations. Youth known to have worse glycemic control in the past had higher odds of not meeting HbA1c screening criteria (OR 1.11, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.17); however, after adjusting for race/ethnicity, this was no longer statistically significant. Greater satisfaction with diabetes care was associated with increased odds of meeting screening criteria for most of the ADA-recommended measures. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts should be made to improve diabetes complications screening efforts for YYAs with T1D, particularly for those at higher risk for diabetes complications.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to: (a) assess the prevalence of diabetes complications and comorbidities screening as recommended by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) for youth and young adults (YYAs) with type 1 diabetes (T1D), (b) examine the association of previously measured metabolic status related to diabetes complications with receipt of recommended clinical screening, and (c) examine the association of satisfaction with diabetes care with receipt of recommended clinical screening. METHODS: The study included 2172 SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth participants with T1D (>10 years old, diabetes duration >5 years). Mean participant age was 17.7 ± 4.3 years with a diabetes duration of 8.1 ± 1.9 years. Linear and multinomial regression models were used to evaluate associations. RESULTS: Sixty percent of participants reported having three or more hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurements in the past year. In terms of diabetes complications screening, 93% reported having blood pressure measured, 81% having an eye examination, 71% having lipid levels checked, 64% having a foot exam, and 63% completing albuminuria screening in accordance with ADA recommendations. Youth known to have worse glycemic control in the past had higher odds of not meeting HbA1c screening criteria (OR 1.11, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.17); however, after adjusting for race/ethnicity, this was no longer statistically significant. Greater satisfaction with diabetes care was associated with increased odds of meeting screening criteria for most of the ADA-recommended measures. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts should be made to improve diabetes complications screening efforts for YYAs with T1D, particularly for those at higher risk for diabetes complications.
Authors: Kellee M Miller; Nicole C Foster; Roy W Beck; Richard M Bergenstal; Stephanie N DuBose; Linda A DiMeglio; David M Maahs; William V Tamborlane Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Beth Waitzfelder; Catherine Pihoker; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Doug Case; Andrea Anderson; Ronny A Bell; Jean M Lawrence; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Giuseppina Imperatore; Debra Standiford; Beatriz L Rodriguez; Dana Dabelea; Michael Seid Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sarah D Corathers; Jessica C Kichler; Nora F Fino; Wei Lang; Jean M Lawrence; Jennifer K Raymond; Joyce P Yi-Frazier; Dana Dabelea; Angela D Liese; Sharon H Saydah; Michael Seid; Lawrence M Dolan Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Mamta Jaiswal; Abigail Lauer; Catherine L Martin; Ronny A Bell; Jasmin Divers; Dana Dabelea; David J Pettitt; Sharon Saydah; Catherine Pihoker; Debra A Standiford; Beatriz L Rodriguez; Rodica Pop-Busui; Eva L Feldman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-10-21 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: David J Pettitt; Jennifer Talton; Dana Dabelea; Jasmin Divers; Giuseppina Imperatore; Jean M Lawrence; Angela D Liese; Barbara Linder; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Catherine Pihoker; Sharon H Saydah; Debra A Standiford; Richard F Hamman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Katherine A Sauder; Jeanette M Stafford; Shelley Ehrlich; Jean M Lawrence; Angela D Liese; Santica Marcovina; Amy K Mottl; Catherine Pihoker; Sharon Saydah; Amy S Shah; Ralph B D'Agostino; Dana Dabelea Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-08-10 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Dana Dabelea; Katherine A Sauder; Elizabeth T Jensen; Amy K Mottl; Alyssa Huang; Catherine Pihoker; Richard F Hamman; Jean Lawrence; Lawrence M Dolan; Ralph D' Agostino; Lynne Wagenknecht; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Santica M Marcovina Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 6.499