Toshimichi Tanaka1, Heita Ozawa2, Yusuke Nakagawa1, Akira Hirata1, Shin Fujita1, Kenichi Sugihara3. 1. Department of Surgery, Tochigi Cancer Center, 4-9-13 Yohnan, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, 320-0834, Japan. 2. Department of Surgery, Tochigi Cancer Center, 4-9-13 Yohnan, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, 320-0834, Japan. heiozawa@tochigi-cc.jp. 3. Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In the TNM classification 8th edition, colorectal cancer (CRC) with peritoneal metastasis, one of the most poor prognostic factors, is classified as M1c (stage IVC), regardless of the presence/absence of other distant metastasis. Several cases with peritoneal metastasis have been successfully managed by surgical treatment; therefore, there is need to give more consideration for uniform differentiation of peritoneal metastasis. This study was aimed at verifying the classification of M1c in CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from a multi-institutional retrospective cohort of 2929 CRC patients who were diagnosed as having stage IV CRC from 1997 to 2007 were analyzed. Peritoneal metastasis alone was defined as M1c1 and peritoneal metastasis with other organ metastasis was defined as M1c2. RESULTS: The 3-year OS of patients with M1c1 was significantly higher than that of patients with M1b (25.6% vs. 18.1%; HR 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.92; p = 0.005); in particular, the prognosis of patients with M1c1 with localized peritoneal metastasis and R0 resection was equivalent to that of patients with M1a (3-year OS 40.5% vs. 39.2%, p = 0.41). On the other hand, among the stage IV cases, patients with M1c2 had a low R0 resection rate (5.9%) and the worst prognosis (3-year OS, 9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of M1c1 with localized peritoneal metastasis is relatively good, and can be further improved by surgical intervention. Combined evaluation of the M1c1/2 classification with the peritoneal metastasis grade may help in establishing more individualized treatment strategies.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In the TNM classification 8th edition, colorectal cancer (CRC) with peritoneal metastasis, one of the most poor prognostic factors, is classified as M1c (stage IVC), regardless of the presence/absence of other distant metastasis. Several cases with peritoneal metastasis have been successfully managed by surgical treatment; therefore, there is need to give more consideration for uniform differentiation of peritoneal metastasis. This study was aimed at verifying the classification of M1c in CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from a multi-institutional retrospective cohort of 2929 CRCpatients who were diagnosed as having stage IV CRC from 1997 to 2007 were analyzed. Peritoneal metastasis alone was defined as M1c1 and peritoneal metastasis with other organ metastasis was defined as M1c2. RESULTS: The 3-year OS of patients with M1c1 was significantly higher than that of patients with M1b (25.6% vs. 18.1%; HR 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.92; p = 0.005); in particular, the prognosis of patients with M1c1 with localized peritoneal metastasis and R0 resection was equivalent to that of patients with M1a (3-year OS 40.5% vs. 39.2%, p = 0.41). On the other hand, among the stage IV cases, patients with M1c2 had a low R0 resection rate (5.9%) and the worst prognosis (3-year OS, 9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of M1c1 with localized peritoneal metastasis is relatively good, and can be further improved by surgical intervention. Combined evaluation of the M1c1/2 classification with the peritoneal metastasis grade may help in establishing more individualized treatment strategies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Colorectal cancer; Peritoneal metastasis; Stage IVC; TNM staging system
Authors: Al B Benson; Michael I D'Angelica; Daniel E Abbott; Thomas A Abrams; Steven R Alberts; Daniel Anaya Saenz; Chandrakanth Are; Daniel B Brown; Daniel T Chang; Anne M Covey; William Hawkins; Renuka Iyer; Rojymon Jacob; Andrea Karachristos; R Kate Kelley; Robin Kim; Manisha Palta; James O Park; Vaibhav Sahai; Tracey Schefter; Carl Schmidt; Jason K Sicklick; Gagandeep Singh; Davendra Sohal; Stacey Stein; G Gary Tian; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Alan P Venook; Andrew X Zhu; Karin G Hoffmann; Susan Darlow Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Fotios Loupakis; Dongyun Yang; Linda Yau; Shibao Feng; Chiara Cremolini; Wu Zhang; Martin K H Maus; Carlotta Antoniotti; Christiane Langer; Stefan J Scherer; Thomas Müller; Herbert I Hurwitz; Leonard Saltz; Alfredo Falcone; Heinz-Josef Lenz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Geert A Simkens; Thijs R van Oudheusden; Misha D Luyer; Simon W Nienhuijs; Grard A Nieuwenhuijzen; Harm J Rutten; Ignace H de Hingh Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 5.344