Fotios Loupakis1, Dongyun Yang1, Linda Yau1, Shibao Feng1, Chiara Cremolini1, Wu Zhang1, Martin K H Maus1, Carlotta Antoniotti1, Christiane Langer1, Stefan J Scherer1, Thomas Müller1, Herbert I Hurwitz1, Leonard Saltz1, Alfredo Falcone1, Heinz-Josef Lenz2. 1. University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (FL, DY, WZ, HJL); U.O. Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy (FL, CC, CA, AF); Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA (LY, SF, CL, SJS, TM); Department of General, Visceral, and Tumor Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (MKHM); Response Genetics, Inc., Los Angeles, CA (MKHM); Department of Medical Oncology and Transplantation, Duke University, Durham, NC (HIH); Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (LS) Current Affiliations: Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. South San Francisco, CA (SF); Biocenter, Physiological Chemistry 1, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany (SJS); Biomarker, Translational and Predictive Medicine Consulting, San Francisco, CA (TM). 2. University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA (FL, DY, WZ, HJL); U.O. Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy (FL, CC, CA, AF); Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA (LY, SF, CL, SJS, TM); Department of General, Visceral, and Tumor Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (MKHM); Response Genetics, Inc., Los Angeles, CA (MKHM); Department of Medical Oncology and Transplantation, Duke University, Durham, NC (HIH); Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (LS) Current Affiliations: Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. South San Francisco, CA (SF); Biocenter, Physiological Chemistry 1, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany (SJS); Biomarker, Translational and Predictive Medicine Consulting, San Francisco, CA (TM). lenz@med.usc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to clarify the prognostic impact of primary tumor location in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: We evaluated the association between tumor location and survival parameters in patients with previously untreated mCRC receiving first-line chemotherapy ± bevacizumab in three independent cohorts: a prospective pharmacogenetic study (PROVETTA) and two randomized phase III trials, AVF2107g and NO16966. Cancers proximal or distal of the splenic flexure were classified as right-sided or left-sided, respectively. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Data were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Among evaluable patients in the PROVETTA (n = 200), AVF2107g (n = 559), and NO16966 (n = 1268) studies, 72.0%, 63.1%, and 73.7% had left-sided tumors, respectively. In PROVETTA, patients with left-sided tumors had superior OS (left-sided vs right-sided: hazard ratio [HR] = .44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .28 to .70, P < .001) and progression-free survival (HR = .52, 95% CI = .36 to .75, P < .001) outcomes. Multivariable analyses confirmed right-sided location as a negative prognostic variable, independent of mucinous histology and BRAF mutational status. Data from the AVF2107g (HR for OS = .55, 95% CI = .43 to .70) and NO16966 trials (HR for OS = .71, 95% CI = .62 to .82 both P < .001) also showed favorable outcomes in patients with left-sided tumors. In both randomized studies, the efficacy of bevacizumab was independent of tumor location. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that primary tumor location is an important prognostic factor in previously untreated mCRC. Given the consistency across an exploratory set and two confirmatory phase III studies, side of tumor origin should be considered for stratification in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: We sought to clarify the prognostic impact of primary tumor location in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: We evaluated the association between tumor location and survival parameters in patients with previously untreated mCRC receiving first-line chemotherapy ± bevacizumab in three independent cohorts: a prospective pharmacogenetic study (PROVETTA) and two randomized phase III trials, AVF2107g and NO16966. Cancers proximal or distal of the splenic flexure were classified as right-sided or left-sided, respectively. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Data were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Among evaluable patients in the PROVETTA (n = 200), AVF2107g (n = 559), and NO16966 (n = 1268) studies, 72.0%, 63.1%, and 73.7% had left-sided tumors, respectively. In PROVETTA, patients with left-sided tumors had superior OS (left-sided vs right-sided: hazard ratio [HR] = .44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .28 to .70, P < .001) and progression-free survival (HR = .52, 95% CI = .36 to .75, P < .001) outcomes. Multivariable analyses confirmed right-sided location as a negative prognostic variable, independent of mucinous histology and BRAF mutational status. Data from the AVF2107g (HR for OS = .55, 95% CI = .43 to .70) and NO16966 trials (HR for OS = .71, 95% CI = .62 to .82 both P < .001) also showed favorable outcomes in patients with left-sided tumors. In both randomized studies, the efficacy of bevacizumab was independent of tumor location. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that primary tumor location is an important prognostic factor in previously untreated mCRC. Given the consistency across an exploratory set and two confirmatory phase III studies, side of tumor origin should be considered for stratification in randomized trials.
Authors: Sandra Van Schaeybroeck; Wendy L Allen; Richard C Turkington; Patrick G Johnston Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Gordon Hutchins; Katie Southward; Kelly Handley; Laura Magill; Claire Beaumont; Jens Stahlschmidt; Susan Richman; Philip Chambers; Matthew Seymour; David Kerr; Richard Gray; Philip Quirke Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-03-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Frank A Sinicrope; Nathan R Foster; Stephen N Thibodeau; Silvia Marsoni; Genevieve Monges; Roberto Labianca; George P Kim; Greg Yothers; Carmen Allegra; Malcolm J Moore; Steven Gallinger; Daniel J Sargent Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Robert A Meguid; Mark B Slidell; Christopher L Wolfgang; David C Chang; Nita Ahuja Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2008-07-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Leonard B Saltz; Stephen Clarke; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Werner Scheithauer; Arie Figer; Ralph Wong; Sheryl Koski; Mikhail Lichinitser; Tsai-Shen Yang; Fernando Rivera; Felix Couture; Florin Sirzén; Jim Cassidy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Cassidy; S Clarke; E Díaz-Rubio; W Scheithauer; A Figer; R Wong; S Koski; K Rittweger; F Gilberg; L Saltz Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: J Souglakos; J Philips; R Wang; S Marwah; M Silver; M Tzardi; J Silver; S Ogino; S Hooshmand; E Kwak; E Freed; J A Meyerhardt; Z Saridaki; V Georgoulias; D Finkelstein; C S Fuchs; M H Kulke; R A Shivdasani Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-07-14 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Felice N van Erning; Marloes A Elferink; Amanda C R K Bos; Valery E P P Lemmens Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: George Papaxoinis; Vassiliki Kotoula; Eleni Giannoulatou; Georgia-Angeliki Koliou; Vasilios Karavasilis; Sotirios Lakis; Andreas Koureas; Mattheos Bobos; Elpida Chalaralambous; Emily Daskalaki; Kyriakos Chatzopoulos; George Tsironis; Elisavet Pazarli; Sofia Chrisafi; Epaminontas Samantas; Ioannis G Kaklamanos; Ioannis Varthalitis; Athina Konstantara; Konstantinos N Syrigos; George Pentheroudakis; Dimitrios Pectasides; George Fountzilas Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Michael Levi; Gintang Prayogi; Farid Sastranagara; Edi Sudianto; Grace Widjajahakim; Winiarti Gani; Albert Mahanadi; Jocelyn Agnes; Bela Haifa Khairunisa; Ahmad R Utomo Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2018-06