Oyunchimeg Buyadaa1,2, Dianna J Magliano3,2, Agus Salim4,5, Digsu N Koye3,2, Jonathan E Shaw3,2. 1. Department of Clinical Diabetes and Epidemiology, Baker Heart & Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia oyunchimeg.buyadaa@baker.edu.au. 2. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Department of Clinical Diabetes and Epidemiology, Baker Heart & Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4. Baker Heart & Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 5. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the rate of progression of nonalbuminuric chronic kidney disease (CKD) to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) or death or major cardiovascular events (MACE) compared with albuminuric and nonalbuminuric phenotypes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We included 10,185 participants with type 2 diabetes enrolled in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study. Based on baseline albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), participants were classified as having no kidney disease (no CKD), albuminuria only (albuminuric non-CKD), reduced eGFR only (nonalbuminuric CKD), or both albuminuria and reduced eGFR (albuminuric CKD). The rate of eGFR decline and hazard ratios (HRs) for ESKD or death or MACE were calculated. RESULTS: For individuals with no CKD and those with nonalbuminuric CKD, the rates of eGFR decline were -1.31 and -0.60 mL/min/year, respectively (P < 0.001). In competing-risks analysis (no CKD as the reference), HRs for ESKD indicated no increased risk for nonalbuminuric CKD (0.76 [95% CI 0.34, 1.70]) and greatest risk for albuminuric CKD (4.52 [2.91, 7.01]). In adjusted Cox models, HRs for death and MACE were highest for albumuniuric CKD (2.38 [1.92, 2.90] and 2.37 [1.89, 2.97], respectively) and were higher for albuminuric non-CKD (1.82 [1.59, 2.08] and 1.88 [1.63, 2.16], respectively) than for those with nonalbuminuric CKD (1.42 [1.14, 1.78] and 1.44 [1.13, 1.84], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Those with nonalbuminuric CKD showed a slower rate of decline in eGFR than did any other group; however, these individuals still carry a greater risk for death and MACE than do those with no CKD.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the rate of progression of nonalbuminuric chronic kidney disease (CKD) to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) or death or major cardiovascular events (MACE) compared with albuminuric and nonalbuminuric phenotypes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We included 10,185 participants with type 2 diabetes enrolled in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study. Based on baseline albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), participants were classified as having no kidney disease (no CKD), albuminuria only (albuminuric non-CKD), reduced eGFR only (nonalbuminuric CKD), or both albuminuria and reduced eGFR (albuminuric CKD). The rate of eGFR decline and hazard ratios (HRs) for ESKD or death or MACE were calculated. RESULTS: For individuals with no CKD and those with nonalbuminuric CKD, the rates of eGFR decline were -1.31 and -0.60 mL/min/year, respectively (P < 0.001). In competing-risks analysis (no CKD as the reference), HRs for ESKD indicated no increased risk for nonalbuminuric CKD (0.76 [95% CI 0.34, 1.70]) and greatest risk for albuminuric CKD (4.52 [2.91, 7.01]). In adjusted Cox models, HRs for death and MACE were highest for albumuniuric CKD (2.38 [1.92, 2.90] and 2.37 [1.89, 2.97], respectively) and were higher for albuminuric non-CKD (1.82 [1.59, 2.08] and 1.88 [1.63, 2.16], respectively) than for those with nonalbuminuric CKD (1.42 [1.14, 1.78] and 1.44 [1.13, 1.84], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Those with nonalbuminuric CKD showed a slower rate of decline in eGFR than did any other group; however, these individuals still carry a greater risk for death and MACE than do those with no CKD.
Authors: Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Timothy Craven; Mary Ann Banerji; Jan Basile; Jorge Calles; Robert M Cohen; Robert Cuddihy; William C Cushman; Saul Genuth; Richard H Grimm; Bruce P Hamilton; Byron Hoogwerf; Diane Karl; Lois Katz; Armand Krikorian; Patrick O'Connor; Rodica Pop-Busui; Ulrich Schubart; Debra Simmons; Harris Taylor; Abraham Thomas; Daniel Weiss; Irene Hramiak Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: D E Bonds; T E Craven; J Buse; J R Crouse; R Cuddihy; M Elam; H N Ginsberg; K Kirchner; S Marcovina; J C Mychaleckyj; P J O'Connor; J-A Sperl-Hillen Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Digsu N Koye; Dianna J Magliano; Christopher M Reid; Christopher Jepson; Harold I Feldman; William H Herman; Jonathan E Shaw Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Merlin C Thomas; Richard J Macisaac; George Jerums; Andrew Weekes; John Moran; Jonathan E Shaw; Robert C Atkins Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: D Banerjee; P Winocour; T A Chowdhury; P De; M Wahba; R Montero; D Fogarty; A H Frankel; J Karalliedde; P B Mark; D C Patel; A Pokrajac; A Sharif; S Zac-Varghese; S Bain; I Dasgupta Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2022-01-03 Impact factor: 2.388