Literature DB >> 3179627

The use of a pharmacological indicator to investigate compliance in patients with a poor response to antirheumatic therapy.

T Pullar1, S Peaker, M F Martin, H A Bird, M P Feely.   

Abstract

Twenty-six patients with rheumatoid arthritis which was poorly controlled despite high dose D-penicillamine were studied. Compliance was assessed by standard methods (return tablet count and interview). In addition low-dose phenobarbitone was included in the penicillamine formulation as a pharmacological indicator of compliance. Using these techniques incomplete compliance was apparent in 11 patients (42%). All such patients were identified by the pharmacological marker. Only one admitted poor compliance at interview and only six returned more than a few tablets too many. The reason for the high incidence of poor compliance in this selected group is not apparent but it may represent a significant cause of failure with D-penicillamine therapy. The use of low-dose phenobarbitone may have wider applications in the investigation of patients with other conditions who fail to respond adequately to treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3179627     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/27.5.381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0263-7103


  23 in total

1.  A comparison of a short half-life marker (low-dose isoniazid), a long half-life pharmacological indicator (low-dose phenobarbitone) and measurements of a controlled release 'therapeutic drug' (metoprolol, Metoros) in reflecting incomplete compliance by volunteers.

Authors:  E Hardy; S Kumar; S Peaker; M Feely; T Pullar
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  In rheumatoid arthritis is compliance in physicians more of a problem than compliance in patients?

Authors:  R J Rooney; W W Buchanan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Compliance in clinical trials.

Authors:  T Pullar; S Kumar; M Feely
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Slow drugs: slow progress? Use of slow acting antirheumatic drugs (SAARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  H A Capell; M Brzeski
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  [Adherence to neurologic treatment. Lessons from multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  S Kern; H Reichmann; T Ziemssen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Measurement of patient compliance and the interpretation of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  R Vander Stichele
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Disease modifying drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: yesterday's treatment today or today's treatment tomorrow?

Authors:  T Pullar
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  The prediction of steady-state plasma phenobarbitone concentrations (following low-dose phenobarbitone) to refine its use as an indicator of compliance.

Authors:  T Pullar; S Kumar; H Chrystyn; P Rice; S Peaker; M Feely
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Compliance with treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Raili Müller; Riina Kallikorm; Kaja Põlluste; Margus Lember
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Depression, medication adherence, and service utilization in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Laura J Julian; Edward Yelin; Jinoos Yazdany; Pantelis Panopalis; Laura Trupin; Lindsey A Criswell; Patricia Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.