Literature DB >> 31795081

Cellulose Nanopaper Cross-Linked Amino Graphene/Polyaniline Sensors to Detect CO2 Gas at Room Temperature.

Hanan Abdali1,2, Bentolhoda Heli1, Abdellah Ajji1.   

Abstract

A nanocomposite of cross-linked bacterial cellulose-amino graphene/polyaniline (CLBC-AmG/PANI) was synthesized by covalent interaction of amino-functionalized graphene (AmG) AmG and bacterial cellulose (BC) via one step esterification, and then the aniline monomer was grown on the surface of CLBC-AmG through in situ chemical polymerization. The morphological structure and properties of the samples were characterized by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and thermal gravimetric analyzer (TGA). The CLBC-AmG/PANI showed good electrical-resistance response toward carbon dioxide (CO2) at room temperature, compared to the BC/PANI nanopaper composites. The CLBC-AmG/PANI sensor possesses high sensitivity and fast response characteristics over CO2 concentrations ranging from 50 to 2000 ppm. This process presents an extremely suitable candidate for developing novel nanomaterials sensors owing to easy fabrication and efficient sensing performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO2 sensing; cellulose nanopaper; functionalized graphene; nanocomposites; polyaniline

Year:  2019        PMID: 31795081      PMCID: PMC6928613          DOI: 10.3390/s19235215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


1. Introduction

It is commonly regarded that high sensitivity, fast response and recovery times, as well as excellent selectivity and functionality at room temperature are important parameters for the evaluation of gas sensors [1,2]. Correspondingly, in the field of material sciences and chemical engineering, the quest to discover advanced materials with excellent performance is perpetual and immediate [3,4,5]. In the last few decades, research into functional materials with special nanoscale architecture has attracted great interest and has presented enhanced properties in numerous applications. These include energy storage application [6,7,8], catalysis application [9], medical applications [10], and gas sensing [3,11]. For gas sensing applications in particular, functionalized graphene-based, gas sensing materials have been prominent and, as a result, the subject of much research, because of its large surface area, unique mechanical, optical, thermal, magnetic, and electrochemical properties, and its variable conductivity, which makes it available for electron transport phenomena with very high electrical mobility, in the presence of oxidizing and reducing gases [5,11,12]. Polyaniline is commonly used in gas sensor materials due to its unique electrical conductivity, redox properties, low production cost, easy preparation in solution, and good stability at room temperature [13,14]. These properties are crucial in gas sensors as they lower the detection limit, decrease the response time, and improve sensitivity. PANI can be synthesized by the oxidation of the monomer aniline through the chemical oxidative polymerization method [15,16]. In in situ chemical oxidative polymerization, the aniline monomer is oxidized by utilizing ammonium persulfate as the redox initiator, which has been effectively used to deposit the conductive PANI on both conductive and nonconductive substrates [15]. Moreover, it is known that combined PANI with functionalized graphene is an effective way to improve the sensing performance, not only due to the unique properties of graphene but also the combined effect of both materials [17,18,19]. It is well accepted that the sensitivities of gas sensors are strongly affected by the specific surface of the sensing materials used, so that a higher specific surface area is directly proportional to the sensitivity and response times of the sensing material [20,21]. Bacterial cellulose (BC), as a special type of cellulose, could be a promising flexible substrate due to its good chemical stability, excellent mechanical strength, and biocompatibility [22,23,24,25]. Research indicates that BC is an excellent supporting material that can be used as deposit nanofillers needed to create advanced BC-based, functional nanomaterials for various technological applications, including gas sensors [25,26,27]. This is the first report on the nanopaper composites of cross-linked bacterial celluloseamino graphene/polyaniline (CLBC-AmG/PANI)-based carbon dioxide (CO2) gas sensors. As reported in our previous work, the graphene surfaces were functionalized by using ethylenediamine (NH2-(CH2)2-NH2), because it is well known that the amine groups are very sensitive and highly efficient at adsorbing CO2 gas [28]. In this work, we designed and fabricated a flexible, freestanding sensor using BC as the flexible substrate and AmG and PANI as active sensing materials. An easy procedure for synthesizing CLBC/AmG nanopaper by the esterification between the carboxyl groups of AmG and hydroxyl groups of BC was reported. In addition, the surface morphology and thermal stability of the CLBC/AmG nanopaper were tested. Then, the PANI was polymerized in situ at the surface of CLBC/AmG nanopaper and the CO2 sensing properties of the CLBC-AmG/PANI sensors were investigated and the mechanism of the sensor was discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Bacterial cellulose (BC) nanopaper was appropriated from Nanonovin Polymer Co. (Mazandaran, Iran). Amino-functionalized graphene (AmG) was synthesized in our lab. Graphene oxide (GO), aniline (ACS reagent, ≥99.5%), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 99.8%), ethylenediamine (EDA, ≥99%), N,N′-Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC, 99%), ammonium persulfate (APS, ≥98.0%), and 5-Sulfosalicylic acid dihydrate (SSA, ≥99%) were all received from Sigma-Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada). Deionized (DI) water was used for all the experiments.

2.2. Synthesis of CLBC-AmG Nanopaper

As shown in Figure 1, the synthesis of AmG (10 mg) was as reported previously in [28], and BC (50 mg) in DMF (50 ml) were stirred for 1 h. Under vigorous stirring, DCC (100 mg) was added as a dehydration reagent. The esterification between the carboxyl group (-COOH) of AmG and hydroxyl group (-OH) of BC was conducted under N2 atmosphere at 80 °C for 48 h to create the crosslinked bacterial celluloseamino-functionalized graphene (CLBC-AmG). Then the CLBC-AmG fibers were washed several times with ethanol and DI water and then dried under vacuum at room temperature (RT) for 24 h.
Figure 1

Illustrates the schematic of the fabrication process of cross-linked bacterial cellulose–amino graphene (CLBC-AmG).

2.3. Fabrication of CLBC-AmG/PANI Nanopaper Electrodes

The PANI on the surface of CLBC/AmG nanopaper was grown by in situ polymerization. The two solutions were kept for 1 h in the refrigerator at 5 °C before immersing the CLBC/AmG and mixing. The CLBC-AmG nanopaper was immersed in 50 ml DI water of (2.45 g) SSA and (1.86 g) aniline (solution 1). Then 50 ml DI water of (4.45 g) APS (solution 2) was added dropwise into solution 1, which was stirred in an ice-water bath for different polymerization times: 30 min, 1 h, and 2 h. Finally, the period of 30 min was chosen for further studies because it reported more flexibility and good electrical conductivity for sensing purposes. Next, the flexible electrodes of CLBC-AmG/PANI were rinsed three times by DI water and ethanol until the residual oxidant was removed (see Figure 2). For comparison, the BC/PANI electrodes were prepared without AmG by a similar procedure. Finally, the samples were left to dry in air at room temperature (RT). All samples were cut into square pieces (20 × 20 mm) and fixed onto glass slides by applying copper tape to provide the appropriate electrical connection between the sensing substrate and measuring device. At the end, the electrodes were stored at RT under vacuum for two months until the sensing properties were investigated.
Figure 2

The schematic diagram of the process preparation of This is the first report on the nanopaper composites of cross-linked bacterial cellulose–amino graphene/polyaniline (CLBC-AmG/PANI) flexible electrodes.

2.4. Characterization Methods

A Raman microspectrometer was recorded on a Renishaw InVia Raman microscope (Renishaw, Mississauga, ON, Canada) at an excitation laser wavelength of 514 nm. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using Q5000 TGA (TA instruments, USA) under a nitrogen atmosphere in the temperature range 20–800 °C, with a heating ramp of 10 °C min−1. Images using a scanning electron microscope (SEM JSM-7600TFE, FEG-SEM, Calgary, AB, Canada) were collected to study the morphology of the nanocomposites with a very thin layer of (1 nm) gold coating.

2.5. Measurement of Gas Sensors

The performance measurements of the fabricated CLBC-AmG/PANI electrodes as a CO2 sensor was similar to that which was described in our previous paper. The measurements of the gas sensing properties were tested under laboratory conditions (35–40% relative humidity, RT) using a PalmSens3 (PalmSens EmStat+Potentiostat w/Bluetooth, Compact Electrochemical interfaces, BASi®, West Lafayette, IN, USA) and the mass flow controllers (MFCs) (MKS instruments Inc., 1179C mass-flow®, Kanata, ON, Canada) were used to control the flow rates of the injected gases. The measurements were obtained using a static process: Initially, the sensor was put into a glass chamber with an inlet and an outlet for gas along with electrical connections. The chamber was first injected with N2 via a micro-injector through a rubber plug to measure the initial resistance of the sensor. Then a CO2 gas (50–2000 ppm) was injected into the chamber. When the response reaches a constant value, the sensor was exposed to N2 to remove CO2 and the recovery behavior of the sensor was investigated.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of CLBC-AmG and CLBC-AmG/PANI Nanopaper

The structure of AmG and CLBC-AmG were studied by using Raman spectra, both the AmG and CLBC-AmG nanopaper have two characteristic peaks at 1595 and 1349 cm−1 corresponding to the G and D bands, respectively (see Figure 3a) [29,30]. The G band indicates the graphitic structure or whiskers like carbon, whereas the D band refers to the disorder in chemically-functionalized graphene sheets. The intensity ratio of D and G bands (ID/IG) is used to infer the degree of chemical functionalization in the carbon materials. The CLBC-AmG showed a higher ID/IG intensity ratio (1.1) than the AmG (0.97), which is ascribed to BC nanopaper intercalating between the AmG sheets which resulted in increased disorder in the graphene sheets.
Figure 3

(a) Raman spectra of amino-functionalized graphene (AmG) and cross-linked bacterial cellulose–amino graphene (CLBC-AmG) nanopaper. (b) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of bacterial cellulose (BC), AmG, and CLBC-AmG nanopaper.

A TGA was conducted to observe the thermal stability of the AmG, BC, and CLBC-AmG. As shown in Figure 3b, the AmG exhibited good thermal stability and large weight loss starts at temperatures of about 449 °C, as the result of the decomposition of amino-carbons, corresponding to previously reported results for the functionalization of graphene with amino groups [28]. The three stages of weight loss can be observed for BC at an initial stage of 35–310 °C, which could be mostly attributed to the moisture evaporation. The major weight loss occurred at the second stage 310–410 °C, and a final weight loss 410–800 °C as the result of degradation and decomposition of the cellulose backbone [29]. In the CLBC-AmG samples, the AmG can considerably improve the thermal stability of BC nanopaper, as shown in Figure 3b. The morphology and structure of BC, CLBC-AmG, and CLBC-AmG/PANI nanopaper are presented in Figure 4a–e. In Figure 4a, the SEM image of BC shows an interconnected, three-dimensional (3D), nanoporous network structure. After the crosslinked BC/AmG via one step esterification, the AmG sheets are clearly interlocked within the 3D web-like arrangement of the BC nanopaper by covalent bonds, as covalent bonding occurs between the reactive groups of both BC and AmG (see Figure 4b). After in situ polymerization, the surfaces of CLBC-AmG are fully covered by hierarchical PANI, which indicates that the PANI are uniformly grown on the surfaces of CLBC-AmG (Figure 4c) [31]. Moreover, the PANI and AmG can be distributed into the BC and forms many channels to provide effective electrolyte transport and active site accessibility, as shown in the cross-section of CLBC-AmG/PANI compared with BC/PANI (see Figure 4d,e) [31]. It should be noted that the freestanding electrode of CLBC-AmG/PANI has good flexibility and can be easily bent, as shown in Figure 4f.
Figure 4

(a–c) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrograph of bacterial cellulose (BC), cross-linked bacterial cellulose–amino graphene (CLBC-AmG), and cross-linked bacterial cellulose–amino graphene/polyaniline (CLBC-AmG/PANI). (d,e) Cross-sectional SEM images of bacterial cellulose/polyaniline (BC/PANI) and CLBC-AmG/PANI. (f) Photograph of CLBC-AmG/PANI nanopaper.

3.2. Evaluation and Discussion of Sensor Behavior

We investigated the sensing performance of the CLBC-AmG/PANI for CO2 in terms of percentage response, which is defined by the percentile resistance change when the sensors are exposed to CO2 as follows: Percentage response = (Rg − R0)/Rg × 100, where R0 and Rg are the resistances of the sensor before and after exposure to CO2, respectively. The response and recovery times of the sensor was defined as the time required to reach 90% of the final resistance. The performance of the CLBC-AmG/PANI and BC/PANI were studied to verify whether the fabricated CLBC-AmG/PANI have any enhanced CO2 sensing properties compared with BC/PANI. Figure 5a shows the response of the sensors to 50, 150, and 250 ppm of CO2. It was indicated that the sensors based on CLBC-AmG/PANI nanopaper exhibit resistance increasing, fast and stable response to CO2 at RT. It was reported that, upon CO2 molecule adsorption, the electrons are released at the p–n junction, which might increase the thickness of the depletion layer [32,33]. Thus, when the thickness of the depletion layer at the interface, between the p-type PANI and n-type AmG in AmG/PANI sensors increased, the resistance also increased [33,34]. Besides, the resistance can be increased due to the reaction between the CO2 and primary amine functional groups to form carbamate, where the number of free amines are reduced and subsequently the proton mobility is reduced, which in turn increases the resistance [34]. Furthermore, the CLBC-AmG/PANI sensors were then exposed to various concentrations of CO2 gas (50, 150, 250, 550, 1500, and 2000 ppm) and the corresponding response of the sensors were recorded. The sensitivity of the CLBC-AmG/PANI-based CO2 sensor was the maximum at 2000 ppm with good response times (~20 s), as shown in Figure 5b. Figure 5c exhibits the sensitivity of the sensor as a function of CO2 concentration from 50 to 2000 ppm. The sensor has a wide detection range towards CO2 gas: The response greatly increases with the CO2 concentration, and is nearly linear with the correlation coefficient close to 0.9867. The limit of quantification (LOQ) of the sensor is defined as the lowest concentration of CO2 that can be detected, LOQ = 10 × standard deviation (SD)/slope [35,36]. The detection limit was repeated three times with SD = 2.62. The calculation of LOQ for the CLBC-AmG/PANI sensor is ~26.55 ppm. It was noted that the sensing properties of the CLBC-AmG/PANI sensor toward 550 ppm CO2 gas at RT and under humidity levels of 0%, 40%, and 80% relative humidity (RH) were tested (see Figure 6a). No remarkable change in the sensitivity of the CLBC-AmG/PANI sensor with the increase in the relative humidity was observed, yet the response time slightly increased as the relative humidity increased. Moreover, the selectivity is another key factor for the evaluation of a gas sensor, and the results are shown in Figure 6b. The CLBC-AmG/PANI sensors were exposed to various gases of ammonia (NH3), hydrogen (H2), and carbon monoxide (CO) at 550 ppm. We observed that the response to CO2 gas displayed more than thrice the magnitude in comparison with the other analytes. It clearly demonstrates that the sensor CLBC-AmG/PANI nanopaper show an excellent selectivity and can be used as a viable candidate for the detection of CO2 gas.
Figure 5

(a) Displays the comparison of the dynamic response of the resultant sensors based on bacterial cellulose/polyaniline (BC/PANI) and cross-linked bacterial cellulose–amino graphene/polyaniline (CLBC-AmG/PANI) toward CO2 at 50, 150, and 250 ppm concentrations. (b) Percentage response of CLBC-AmG/PANI under various concentrations of CO2 gas. (c) Percentage responses of CLBC-AmG/PANI as a function of CO2 concentrations.

Figure 6

(a) Percentage response of cross-linked bacterial cellulose–amino graphene/polyaniline (CLBC-AmG/PANI) exposure to CO2 (550 ppm) under different relative humidity (RH) ranges at room temperature (RT). (b) Selectivity study of CLBC-AmG/PANI at 550 ppm against other gases.

In our previous publication, we introduced AmG/PANI electrospun nanofiber composites for detecting CO2 gas. The device features a chemoresistive sensor that can detect the concentration of CO2 accurately. In this sensor, the functionalized graphene with polyaniline as the active material was deposited onto the surface of the electrospun nanofiber substrate of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Despite the success, the sensor exhibited less flexibility. In this work, we present a freestanding CO2 sensor with excellent flexibility and manageability, a high response and high selectivity to CO2 at RT. In addition, it should be noted that the sensing performance of the CLBC-AmG/PANI nanopaper exhibited better sensitivity and fast response time at RT compared with the previously reported CO2 sensors, as shown in Table 1. However, the sensor is irreversible and non-reusable at RT. In conclusion, the CO2 sensor based on the CLBC-AmG/PANI shows superior flexibility, high selectivity, and accurate detection of CO2 concentrations ranging from 50 to 2000 ppm, and this concentration range sufficiently covers the need for CO2 detection for many environmental and industrial applications.
Table 1

Comparison of sensing performance of our proposed CO2 sensor with other published CO2 sensors.

Materials.Range of CO2 Concentration (ppm)Response Time (s)Temp. (°C)Ref.
La2O2CO3 nanorods100–300015325[37]
La-loaded ZnO500–500090400[38]
LaOCL-doped SnO2 nanofibers100–20,00024300[39]
ZnO nanoflakes200–1025<20250[40]
CLBC-AmG/PANI nanopaper50–2000>20RTThis work
Lanthanum dioxide carbonate (La2O2CO3), lanthanum (La), stannic oxide (SnO2), zinc oxide (ZnO), and cross-linked bacterial cellulose–amino graphene/polyaniline (CLBC-AmG/PANI).

4. Conclusions

We have developed a sensitive room-temperature CO2 gas sensor based on the CLBC-AmG/PANI nanopaper, which was formed by crosslinked BC and AmG via covalent interaction and the PANI was deposited onto the CLBC-AmG surfaces. The CLBC-AmG nanopaper was characterized using SEM, Raman, and TGA techniques. The sensor exhibited a high sensitivity (50 ppm) and selectivity for CO2 gas, including superior flexibility and manageability. The sensor responses showed a nearly linear relationship with CO2 concentration. Since the preparation process for the CLBC-AmG/PANI sensors was easy and the sensing performance reliable, we believe it has great potential for the sensitive detection of CO2 gas in different fields.
  10 in total

1.  Electrically conductive nano graphite-filled bacterial cellulose composites.

Authors:  Esra Erbas Kiziltas; Alper Kiziltas; Kevin Rhodes; Nuri W Emanetoglu; Melanie Blumentritt; Douglas J Gardner
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 9.381

2.  Sensing approaches on paper-based devices: a review.

Authors:  Emilia W Nery; Lauro T Kubota
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 3.  Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites.

Authors:  Robert J Moon; Ashlie Martini; John Nairn; John Simonsen; Jeff Youngblood
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 4.  Hollow-structured mesoporous materials: chemical synthesis, functionalization and applications.

Authors:  Yongsheng Li; Jianlin Shi
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  Modulation of population density and size of silver nanoparticles embedded in bacterial cellulose via ammonia exposure: visual detection of volatile compounds in a piece of plasmonic nanopaper.

Authors:  B Heli; E Morales-Narváez; H Golmohammadi; A Ajji; A Merkoçi
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 7.790

6.  Recent advances in three-dimensional graphene based materials for catalysis applications.

Authors:  Bocheng Qiu; Mingyang Xing; Jinlong Zhang
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 7.  Graphene Hybrid Materials in Gas Sensing Applications.

Authors:  Usman Latif; Franz L Dickert
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Recent Advances in Electrochemical Sensors for Detecting Toxic Gases: NO₂, SO₂ and H₂S.

Authors:  Md Ashfaque Hossain Khan; Mulpuri V Rao; Qiliang Li
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Preparation of Electrospun Nanocomposite Nanofibers of Polyaniline/Poly(methyl methacrylate) with Amino-Functionalized Graphene.

Authors:  Hanan Abdali; Abdellah Ajji
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 10.  Approaches to Enhancing Gas Sensing Properties: A Review.

Authors:  Zhenyu Yuan; Rui Li; Fanli Meng; Junjie Zhang; Kaiyuan Zuo; Erchou Han
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.