Literature DB >> 31794057

Prostate cancer incidence across stage, NCCN risk groups, and age before and after USPSTF Grade D recommendations against prostate-specific antigen screening in 2012.

Santino S Butler1, Vinayak Muralidhar1, Shuang G Zhao2, Nina N Sanford3, Idalid Franco1, Zoe H Fullerton1, Janice Chavez1, Anthony V D'Amico1, Felix Y Feng4, Timothy R Rebbeck1,5, Paul L Nguyen1, Brandon A Mahal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the extent to which US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2012 Grade D recommendations against prostate-specific antigen screening may have impacted recent prostate cancer disease incidence patterns in the United States across stage, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk groups, and age groups.
METHODS: SEER*Stat version 8.3.4 was used to calculate annual prostate cancer incidence rates from 2010 to 2015 for men aged ≥50 years according to American Joint Committee on Cancer stage at diagnosis (localized vs metastatic), NCCN risk group (low vs unfavorable [intermediate or high-risk]), and age group (50-74 years vs ≥75 years). Age-adjusted incidences per 100,000 persons with corresponding year-by-year incidence ratios (IRs) were calculated using the 2000 US Census population.
RESULTS: From 2010 to 2015, the incidence (per 100,000 persons) of localized prostate cancer decreased from 195.4 to 131.9 (Ptrend  < .001) and from 189.0 to 123.4 (Ptrend  < .001) among men aged 50-74 and ≥75 years, respectively. The largest relative year-by-year decline occurred between 2011 and 2012 in NCCN low-risk disease (IR, 0.77 [0.75-0.79, P < .0001] and IR 0.68 [0.62-0.74, P < .0001] for men aged 50-74 and ≥75 years, respectively). From 2010-2015, the incidence of metastatic disease increased from 6.2 to 7.1 (Ptrend  < .001) and from 16.8 to 22.6 (Ptrend  < .001) among men aged 50-74 and ≥75 years, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This report illustrates recent prostate cancer "reverse migration" away from indolent disease and toward more aggressive disease beginning in 2012. The incidence of localized disease declined across age groups from 2012 to 2015, with the greatest relative declines occurring in low-risk disease. Additionally, the incidence of distant metastatic disease increased gradually throughout the study period.
© 2019 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PSA screening; incidence; prostate cancer; prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31794057     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  17 in total

1.  Associations of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Testing in the US Population: Results from a National Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Jarrett A Johnson; Richard P Moser; Gary L Ellison; Damali N Martin
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2020-10-16

2.  Changes in prostate cancer survival among insured patients in relation to USPSTF screening recommendations.

Authors:  Isaac E Kim; Daniel D Kim; Sinae Kim; Shuangge Ma; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer; Saum Ghodoussipour; Isaac Yi Kim
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.090

Review 3.  Prostate cancer in transgender women: considerations for screening, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Fionnuala Crowley; Meredith Mihalopoulos; Simita Gaglani; Ashutosh K Tewari; Che-Kai Tsao; Miroslav Djordjevic; Natasha Kyprianou; Rajveer S Purohit; Dara J Lundon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 9.075

4.  Trends in treatments for prostate cancer in the United States, 2010-2015.

Authors:  Jianwei Wang; Harry Hua-Xiang Xia; Yuanyuan Zhang; Lanjing Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  PSA Screening: a Kind of Russian Roulette?

Authors:  Takeshi Takahashi
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.473

Review 6.  Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: Current Perspective on the Evolving Therapeutic Landscape.

Authors:  Mary E Hall; Heather L Huelster; Amy N Luckenbaugh; Aaron A Laviana; Kirk A Keegan; Zachary Klaassen; Kelvin A Moses; Christopher J D Wallis
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Prognosis of prostate cancer and bone metastasis pattern of patients: a SEER-based study and a local hospital based study from China.

Authors:  Dongyu Liu; Yue Kuai; Ruohui Zhu; Chenhe Zhou; Yiqing Tao; Weidong Han; Qixin Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Analysis of Radiation Facility Volume and Survival in Men With Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiation and Androgen Deprivation Therapy.

Authors:  Sagar A Patel; Subir Goyal; Yuan Liu; Drew Moghanaki; Pretesh R Patel; Sheela Hanasoge; Vishal R Dhere; Jay W Shelton; Karen D Godette; Ashesh B Jani; Bruce Hershatter; Benjamin W Fischer-Valuck
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-12-01

9.  MRI-derived radiomics model for baseline prediction of prostate cancer progression on active surveillance.

Authors:  Nikita Sushentsev; Leonardo Rundo; Oleg Blyuss; Vincent J Gnanapragasam; Evis Sala; Tristan Barrett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Trends in mortality among Black and White men with prostate cancer in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania: Race and neighborhood socioeconomic position.

Authors:  Hari S Iyer; Scarlett L Gomez; Jarvis T Chen; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 6.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.