Literature DB >> 31792337

A Weighted Genetic Risk Score of Adult Glioma Susceptibility Loci Associated with Pediatric Brain Tumor Risk.

Maral Adel Fahmideh1,2, Catharina Lavebratt3, Giorgio Tettamanti4, Joachim Schüz5, Martin Röösli6,7, Kristina Kjaerheim8, Michael A Grotzer9, Christoffer Johansen10,11, Claudia E Kuehni12,13, Birgitta Lannering14, Lisbeth S Schmidt15, Hatef Darabi16, Maria Feychting4.   

Abstract

Genetic risk score (GRS) is used to demonstrate the genetic variants contributing to the polygenic architecture of complex diseases. By using a GRS, we have investigated the additive impact of the known adult glioma susceptibility loci on the pediatric brain tumor (PBT) risk and assessed the proportion of PBT heritability attributable to these susceptibility loci. A GRS was generated for PBTs based on the alleles and associated effect sizes derived from a previously published genome-wide association study on adult glioma. The GRS was calculated in CEFALO, a population-based case-control study of brain tumors in children and adolescents including saliva DNA of 245 cases and 489 controls. The unconditional logistic regression model was used to investigate the association between standardized GRS and risk of PBTs. To measure the variance explained by the effect of GRS, Nagelkerke pseudo-R2 was calculated. The GRS for adult brain tumors was associated with an increased risk of PBTs (OR 1.25 [95% CI 1.06-1.49], p = 0.009) and 0.3% of the variance in PBTs could be explained by the effect of GRS on the liability scale. This study provides evidence that heritable risks of PBTs are in-part attributable to some common genetic variants associated with adult glioma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31792337      PMCID: PMC6889151          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54701-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Genetic risk score (GRS), or polygenetic risk score, calculations are used to analyze the oligo- or polygenic architecture underlying complex genetic disorders. In such calculations, first, the alleles which are associated with a trait at a certain threshold and their effect sizes are identified in a discovery sample. Then, a GRS, being a composite score of the alleles identified in the discovery sample and weighted by the effect size (e.g. log odds ratio (OR)), is calculated for each individual in an independent target sample. Later, the regression model is applied to assess the association between the GRS and the phenotype in the target sample adjusting for covariates[1]. The current study aimed to examine whether the genetic risk score for adult brain tumors, taking into account the combined effect of five susceptibility loci, is associated with risk of pediatric brain tumors and to assess the proportion of pediatric brain tumor heritability attributable to these known adult glioma susceptibility loci.

Methods

We generated the GRS for pediatric brain tumors based on the alleles and associated effect sizes derived from a previously published genome-wide association study (GWAS) on adult glioma[2], which in turn was based on the meta-analysis of six previously published GWAS and also two new GWAS including in total 12496 cases and 18190 controls. Quality control procedures and the GWAS results were described in details in the original paper[2]. The CEFALO study was employed as the target sample. CEFALO is a population-based case-control study of brain tumors in children and adolescents aged 7–19 years conducted in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Switzerland. Details of the study methods, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) selection, genotyping, and the quality control procedures have been described previously[3-5]. Briefly, saliva DNA of 245 cases and 489 controls was included in the study and was satisfactorily genotyped for 92 SNPs. The study was approved by the national data protection boards and ethical committees in all participating countries, all research was performed in accordance with relevant guidelines/regulations and written informed consent was obtained from all participants and/or their parents. Table 1 summarizes demographic characteristics of included cases and controls and the distributions of diagnostic pediatric brain tumor types. We selected the discovery sample for these analyses based on its similarity with the target sample for ethnicity, as well as its large sample size leading to the more accurate reported estimates.
Table 1

Characteristics of cases and controls.

CharacteristicsCasesControls
No. of participants245489
Sex
Males136 (56%)261 (53%)
Females109 (44%)228 (47%)
Age-group (at reference date)
7–9 years old48 (20%)112 (23%)
10–14 years old108 (44%)219 (45%)
15–19 years old89 (36%)158 (32%)
Country
Sweden106 (43%)174 (36%)
Norway24 (10%)62 (13%)
Denmark62 (25%)134 (27%)
Switzerland53 (22%)119(24%)
Type of tumor (ICCC-3 group III)a
Astrocytoma (IIIb)134 (55%)
Other gliomas (IIId)20 (8%)
Ependymoma (IIIa)19 (8%)
Intracranial embryonal tumors (IIIc)7 (3%)
Other specified intracranial neoplasms (IIIe)49 (20%)
Unspecified intracranial neoplasm (IIIf)16 (6%)

Restricted to ICD-O-3 location C71; patients with neurofibromatosis and tuberous sclerosis were excluded.

Characteristics of cases and controls. Restricted to ICD-O-3 location C71; patients with neurofibromatosis and tuberous sclerosis were excluded. SNPs which were associated with the adult glioma risk at the genome-wide significance level in all the discovery, validation and combined results of either all glioma or non-glioblastoma glioma in the discovery sample were selected for the GRS analyses. Thus, the GRS in the CEFALO study was based on 5 SNPs (rs6010620, rs2736100, rs4977756, rs498872, rs2297440) and corresponding to the number of the risk alleles weighted by the logarithm of the ORs from the discovery sample across this set of SNPs (Table 2). PLINK was used to perform the analyses[6].
Table 2

Summary results of the discovery sample for the SNPs included in genetic risk score analyses[2].

SNPChr.GeneLocation (bp)Risk alleleRef alleleOR95% CIP value
rs27361005TERT1339516CA1.291.25–1.342.34 × 10−45
rs49777569CDKN2A/B22058652GA1.281.23–1.321.46 × 10−41
rs49887211PHLDB1117982577AG1.141.10–1.184.09 × 10−11
rs601062020RTEL161780283GA1.341.29–1.402.81 × 10−40
rs29744020RTEL162312299CT1.361.30–1.421.60 × 10−42
Summary results of the discovery sample for the SNPs included in genetic risk score analyses[2]. The GRS was subsequently standardized using its mean value and standard deviation (SD); for which the OR associated with it can then be interpreted as the increased (or decreased) odds of pediatric brain tumors for a one SD change in GRS. The unconditional logistic regression model was applied to evaluate whether the standardized GRS is associated with the risk of pediatric brain tumors adjusted for age, sex and country as covariates (full model); unmatched analyses have been performed since not all CEFALO participants provided saliva sample. To measure the variance explained by the effect of GRS, Nagelkerke pseudo-R2 was calculated as the difference of R2 in the full model compared to the reduced model including the covariates but not the GRS. The analyses were conducted using R[7]. The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board in Stockholm, Sweden.

Results

The results indicated that the standardized genetic risk score for adult brain tumors was associated with increased risk of pediatric brain tumors (OR 1.25 [95% CI 1.06–1.49], p = 0.009). The identified OR of 1.25 can be interpreted as: one SD increase in GRS is associated with a 25% increased odds of pediatric brain tumors. Moreover, 1.2% of the variance in pediatric brain tumors could be explained by the effect of the GRS (R2 = 0.012). The estimated disease prevalence used to transform the estimated heritability to the liability scale was 0.04%. The SNP-heritability on the liability scale was estimated to be 0.003. The minimum detectable ORs for each individual SNPs rs6010620 (G), rs2736100 (C), rs4977756 (G), rs498872 (A), and rs2297440 (C) in this dataset of 245 cases and 489 controls were 1.61, 1.56, 1.56, 1.58, and 1.62, respectively.

Discussion

This study was performed based on the hitherto largest series of pediatric brain tumor cases with the purpose to investigate the additive impact of the known adult glioma susceptibility loci on pediatric brain tumor risk and for the first time to investigate the similarity of SNP-heritability between adult and pediatric brain tumors. To our knowledge, to date, two studies have assessed the heritability of adult glioma based on the known glioma susceptibility loci. Sampson et al. assessed the adult glioma heritability based on 10 loci (rs1412829, rs2157719, rs2736100, rs2853676, rs4295627, rs4809324, rs4977756, rs498872, rs6010620, rs891835) and reported the estimated SNP-heritability of 1.7% (h2 = 0.017)[8]. Moreover, Kinnersley et al. investigated the proportion of glioma heritability attributable to known glioma susceptibility loci (rs2736100, rs11979158, rs2252586, rs4295627, rs4977756, rs498872, rs6010620) and the estimated proportion of genetic variance of adult glioma explained by these seven risk loci was 1.6%[9]. In the present study, we estimated that 0.3% of the variance in the pediatric brain tumors could be explained by the effect of the genetic risk score containing five known adult glioma susceptibility loci. This provides evidence that the heritable risks of pediatric brain tumors are in-part attributable to some common genetic variants associated with adult glioma. Also, previously, based on CEFALO study, we could show that adult and pediatric brain tumors have some genetic risk factors in common[4,5]. However, more polygenic analyses based on large sample sizes and big genotyping data for both adult and pediatric brain tumors are required to determine the similarity of genetic architecture in adult and pediatric brain tumors which is clinically relevant from a risk prediction and treatment perspective. In addition, this line of research provides the basis to develop comprehensive risk prediction models including both genetic and environmental factors for brain tumors that eventually may lead to brain tumor prediction and prevention. This can be achieved by incorporating large collaborative genetic association studies and high quality registration data and could be leveraged by refinement of molecular classification and development of somatic characteristics of brain tumors[10].
  9 in total

1.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Analysis of Heritability and Shared Heritability Based on Genome-Wide Association Studies for Thirteen Cancer Types.

Authors:  Joshua N Sampson; William A Wheeler; Meredith Yeager; Orestis Panagiotou; Zhaoming Wang; Sonja I Berndt; Qing Lan; Christian C Abnet; Laufey T Amundadottir; Jonine D Figueroa; Maria Teresa Landi; Lisa Mirabello; Sharon A Savage; Philip R Taylor; Immaculata De Vivo; Katherine A McGlynn; Mark P Purdue; Preetha Rajaraman; Hans-Olov Adami; Anders Ahlbom; Demetrius Albanes; Maria Fernanda Amary; She-Juan An; Ulrika Andersson; Gerald Andriole; Irene L Andrulis; Emanuele Angelucci; Stephen M Ansell; Cecilia Arici; Bruce K Armstrong; Alan A Arslan; Melissa A Austin; Dalsu Baris; Donald A Barkauskas; Bryan A Bassig; Nikolaus Becker; Yolanda Benavente; Simone Benhamou; Christine Berg; David Van Den Berg; Leslie Bernstein; Kimberly A Bertrand; Brenda M Birmann; Amanda Black; Heiner Boeing; Paolo Boffetta; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Paige M Bracci; Louise Brinton; Angela R Brooks-Wilson; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Laurie Burdett; Julie Buring; Mary Ann Butler; Qiuyin Cai; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Federico Canzian; Alfredo Carrato; Tania Carreon; Angela Carta; John K C Chan; Ellen T Chang; Gee-Chen Chang; I-Shou Chang; Jiang Chang; Jenny Chang-Claude; Chien-Jen Chen; Chih-Yi Chen; Chu Chen; Chung-Hsing Chen; Constance Chen; Hongyan Chen; Kexin Chen; Kuan-Yu Chen; Kun-Chieh Chen; Ying Chen; Ying-Hsiang Chen; Yi-Song Chen; Yuh-Min Chen; Li-Hsin Chien; María-Dolores Chirlaque; Jin Eun Choi; Yi Young Choi; Wong-Ho Chow; Charles C Chung; Jacqueline Clavel; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Pierluigi Cocco; Joanne S Colt; Eva Comperat; Lucia Conde; Joseph M Connors; David Conti; Victoria K Cortessis; Michelle Cotterchio; Wendy Cozen; Simon Crouch; Marta Crous-Bou; Olivier Cussenot; Faith G Davis; Ti Ding; W Ryan Diver; Miren Dorronsoro; Laure Dossus; Eric J Duell; Maria Grazia Ennas; Ralph L Erickson; Maria Feychting; Adrienne M Flanagan; Lenka Foretova; Joseph F Fraumeni; Neal D Freedman; Laura E Beane Freeman; Charles Fuchs; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Steven Gallinger; Yu-Tang Gao; Susan M Gapstur; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Reina García-Closas; Randy D Gascoyne; Julie Gastier-Foster; Mia M Gaudet; J Michael Gaziano; Carol Giffen; Graham G Giles; Edward Giovannucci; Bengt Glimelius; Michael Goggins; Nalan Gokgoz; Alisa M Goldstein; Richard Gorlick; Myron Gross; Robert Grubb; Jian Gu; Peng Guan; Marc Gunter; Huan Guo; Thomas M Habermann; Christopher A Haiman; Dina Halai; Goran Hallmans; Manal Hassan; Claudia Hattinger; Qincheng He; Xingzhou He; Kathy Helzlsouer; Brian Henderson; Roger Henriksson; Henrik Hjalgrim; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Chancellor Hohensee; Theodore R Holford; Elizabeth A Holly; Yun-Chul Hong; Robert N Hoover; Pamela L Horn-Ross; G M Monawar Hosain; H Dean Hosgood; Chin-Fu Hsiao; Nan Hu; Wei Hu; Zhibin Hu; Ming-Shyan Huang; Jose-Maria Huerta; Jen-Yu Hung; Amy Hutchinson; Peter D Inskip; Rebecca D Jackson; Eric J Jacobs; Mazda Jenab; Hyo-Sung Jeon; Bu-Tian Ji; Guangfu Jin; Li Jin; Christoffer Johansen; Alison Johnson; Yoo Jin Jung; Rudolph Kaaks; Aruna Kamineni; Eleanor Kane; Chang Hyun Kang; Margaret R Karagas; Rachel S Kelly; Kay-Tee Khaw; Christopher Kim; Hee Nam Kim; Jin Hee Kim; Jun Suk Kim; Yeul Hong Kim; Young Tae Kim; Young-Chul Kim; Cari M Kitahara; Alison P Klein; Robert J Klein; Manolis Kogevinas; Takashi Kohno; Laurence N Kolonel; Charles Kooperberg; Anne Kricker; Vittorio Krogh; Hideo Kunitoh; Robert C Kurtz; Sun-Seog Kweon; Andrea LaCroix; Charles Lawrence; Fernando Lecanda; Victor Ho Fun Lee; Donghui Li; Haixin Li; Jihua Li; Yao-Jen Li; Yuqing Li; Linda M Liao; Mark Liebow; Tracy Lightfoot; Wei-Yen Lim; Chien-Chung Lin; Dongxin Lin; Sara Lindstrom; Martha S Linet; Brian K Link; Chenwei Liu; Jianjun Liu; Li Liu; Börje Ljungberg; Josep Lloreta; Simonetta Di Lollo; Daru Lu; Eiluv Lund; Nuria Malats; Satu Mannisto; Loic Le Marchand; Neyssa Marina; Giovanna Masala; Giuseppe Mastrangelo; Keitaro Matsuo; Marc Maynadie; James McKay; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Mads Melbye; Beatrice S Melin; Dominique S Michaud; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Alain Monnereau; Rebecca Montalvan; Lee E Moore; Lotte Maxild Mortensen; Alexandra Nieters; Kari E North; Anne J Novak; Ann L Oberg; Kenneth Offit; In-Jae Oh; Sara H Olson; Domenico Palli; William Pao; In Kyu Park; Jae Yong Park; Kyong Hwa Park; Ana Patiño-Garcia; Sofia Pavanello; Petra H M Peeters; Reury-Perng Perng; Ulrike Peters; Gloria M Petersen; Piero Picci; Malcolm C Pike; Stefano Porru; Jennifer Prescott; Ludmila Prokunina-Olsson; Biyun Qian; You-Lin Qiao; Marco Rais; Elio Riboli; Jacques Riby; Harvey A Risch; Cosmeri Rizzato; Rebecca Rodabough; Eve Roman; Morgan Roupret; Avima M Ruder; Silvia de Sanjose; Ghislaine Scelo; Alan Schned; Fredrick Schumacher; Kendra Schwartz; Molly Schwenn; Katia Scotlandi; Adeline Seow; Consol Serra; Massimo Serra; Howard D Sesso; Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Gianluca Severi; Richard K Severson; Tait D Shanafelt; Hongbing Shen; Wei Shen; Min-Ho Shin; Kouya Shiraishi; Xiao-Ou Shu; Afshan Siddiq; Luis Sierrasesúmaga; Alan Dart Loon Sihoe; Christine F Skibola; Alex Smith; Martyn T Smith; Melissa C Southey; John J Spinelli; Anthony Staines; Meir Stampfer; Marianna C Stern; Victoria L Stevens; Rachael S Stolzenberg-Solomon; Jian Su; Wu-Chou Su; Malin Sund; Jae Sook Sung; Sook Whan Sung; Wen Tan; Wei Tang; Adonina Tardón; David Thomas; Carrie A Thompson; Lesley F Tinker; Roberto Tirabosco; Anne Tjønneland; Ruth C Travis; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Fang-Yu Tsai; Ying-Huang Tsai; Margaret Tucker; Jenny Turner; Claire M Vajdic; Roel C H Vermeulen; Danylo J Villano; Paolo Vineis; Jarmo Virtamo; Kala Visvanathan; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Chaoyu Wang; Chih-Liang Wang; Jiu-Cun Wang; Junwen Wang; Fusheng Wei; Elisabete Weiderpass; George J Weiner; Stephanie Weinstein; Nicolas Wentzensen; Emily White; Thomas E Witzig; Brian M Wolpin; Maria Pik Wong; Chen Wu; Guoping Wu; Junjie Wu; Tangchun Wu; Wei Wu; Xifeng Wu; Yi-Long Wu; Jay S Wunder; Yong-Bing Xiang; Jun Xu; Ping Xu; Pan-Chyr Yang; Tsung-Ying Yang; Yuanqing Ye; Zhihua Yin; Jun Yokota; Ho-Il Yoon; Chong-Jen Yu; Herbert Yu; Kai Yu; Jian-Min Yuan; Andrew Zelenetz; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Xu-Chao Zhang; Yawei Zhang; Xueying Zhao; Zhenhong Zhao; Hong Zheng; Tongzhang Zheng; Wei Zheng; Baosen Zhou; Meng Zhu; Mariagrazia Zucca; Simina M Boca; James R Cerhan; Giovanni M Ferri; Patricia Hartge; Chao Agnes Hsiung; Corrado Magnani; Lucia Miligi; Lindsay M Morton; Karin E Smedby; Lauren R Teras; Joseph Vijai; Sophia S Wang; Paul Brennan; Neil E Caporaso; David J Hunter; Peter Kraft; Nathaniel Rothman; Debra T Silverman; Susan L Slager; Stephen J Chanock; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: a multicenter case-control study.

Authors:  Denis Aydin; Maria Feychting; Joachim Schüz; Tore Tynes; Tina Veje Andersen; Lisbeth Samsø Schmidt; Aslak Harbo Poulsen; Christoffer Johansen; Michaela Prochazka; Birgitta Lannering; Lars Klæboe; Tone Eggen; Daniela Jenni; Michael Grotzer; Nicolas Von der Weid; Claudia E Kuehni; Martin Röösli
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Risk factors for childhood and adult primary brain tumors.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Maral Adel Fahmideh; David J Cote; Ivo S Muskens; Jeremy M Schraw; Michael E Scheurer; Melissa L Bondy
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  CCDC26, CDKN2BAS, RTEL1 and TERT Polymorphisms in pediatric brain tumor susceptibility.

Authors:  Maral Adel Fahmideh; Catharina Lavebratt; Joachim Schüz; Martin Röösli; Tore Tynes; Michael A Grotzer; Christoffer Johansen; Claudia E Kuehni; Birgitta Lannering; Michaela Prochazka; Lisbeth S Schmidt; Maria Feychting
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 6.  Research review: Polygenic methods and their application to psychiatric traits.

Authors:  Naomi R Wray; Sang Hong Lee; Divya Mehta; Anna A E Vinkhuyzen; Frank Dudbridge; Christel M Middeldorp
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 8.982

7.  Genome-wide association study of glioma subtypes identifies specific differences in genetic susceptibility to glioblastoma and non-glioblastoma tumors.

Authors:  Beatrice S Melin; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Margaret R Wrensch; Christoffer Johansen; Dora Il'yasova; Ben Kinnersley; Quinn T Ostrom; Karim Labreche; Yanwen Chen; Georgina Armstrong; Yanhong Liu; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Paul A Decker; Marianne Labussière; Ahmed Idbaih; Khe Hoang-Xuan; Anna-Luisa Di Stefano; Karima Mokhtari; Jean-Yves Delattre; Peter Broderick; Pilar Galan; Konstantinos Gousias; Johannes Schramm; Minouk J Schoemaker; Sarah J Fleming; Stefan Herms; Stefanie Heilmann; Markus M Nöthen; Heinz-Erich Wichmann; Stefan Schreiber; Anthony Swerdlow; Mark Lathrop; Matthias Simon; Marc Sanson; Ulrika Andersson; Preetha Rajaraman; Stephen Chanock; Martha Linet; Zhaoming Wang; Meredith Yeager; John K Wiencke; Helen Hansen; Lucie McCoy; Terri Rice; Matthew L Kosel; Hugues Sicotte; Christopher I Amos; Jonine L Bernstein; Faith Davis; Dan Lachance; Ching Lau; Ryan T Merrell; Joellen Shildkraut; Francis Ali-Osman; Siegal Sadetzki; Michael Scheurer; Sanjay Shete; Rose K Lai; Elizabeth B Claus; Sara H Olson; Robert B Jenkins; Richard S Houlston; Melissa L Bondy
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 41.307

8.  Quantifying the heritability of glioma using genome-wide complex trait analysis.

Authors:  Ben Kinnersley; Jonathan S Mitchell; Konstantinos Gousias; Johannes Schramm; Ahmed Idbaih; Marianne Labussière; Yannick Marie; Amithys Rahimian; H-Erich Wichmann; Stefan Schreiber; Khe Hoang-Xuan; Jean-Yves Delattre; Markus M Nöthen; Karima Mokhtari; Mark Lathrop; Melissa Bondy; Matthias Simon; Marc Sanson; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Common genetic variations in cell cycle and DNA repair pathways associated with pediatric brain tumor susceptibility.

Authors:  Maral Adel Fahmideh; Catharina Lavebratt; Joachim Schüz; Martin Röösli; Tore Tynes; Michael A Grotzer; Christoffer Johansen; Claudia E Kuehni; Birgitta Lannering; Michaela Prochazka; Lisbeth S Schmidt; Maria Feychting
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-27
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Assessing the quality of deliberative stakeholder consultations involving allied health professionals in pediatric palliative care and hematology/oncology in Canada.

Authors:  Vasiliki Rahimzadeh; Cristina Longo; Justin Gagnon; Conrad Fernandez; Gillian Bartlett
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.234

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.