| Literature DB >> 31792332 |
Xiaoxiao Wang1, Lumin Yang1, Jiajia Wang1, Yafei Zhang2,3, Ruixia Dong4, Ximing Wu1, Chung S Yang5,6, Zhenhua Zhang7,8, Jinsong Zhang9,10.
Abstract
Acute liver failure is divided into hyperacute, acute and subacute liver failure. Ascites is a common complication of subacute liver failure. Although animal models of acute liver failure have been established, the study of the pathogenesis of subacute liver failure with ascites complication is hampered by the lack of experimental animal model. The present study aimed at providing a mouse model of subacute liver failure with ascites complication. Kunming mice were intraperitoneally injected with (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a redox-active polyphenol from green tea, for 32 consecutive days with step-wise increased dosage. The EGCG treatment resulted in liver failure as evidenced by extensive hepatocyte necrosis observed histologically along with significant elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin and direct bilirubin levels as well as significant reduction of serum albumin. Liver fibrosis was not observed by Masson staining and fibrosis-associated proteins were not increased. The mortality was less than 12% and the survival mice developed noticeable ascites. Hepatic thioredoxin and glutathione systems were activated by the EGCG. These adaptive responses might render most mice tolerable to the EGCG treatment. The EGCG treatment significantly up-regulated renal urea transporter A1 and promoted its trafficking to apical membrane. These alterations, known to increase water reabsorption, may be responsible, at least in part, for the formation of the ascites. Overall, the mice treated with gradually elevated doses of EGCG exhibits some of the features observed in patients with subacute liver failure, especially ascites. This mouse model is a useful tool for investigating the pathogenesis of subacute liver failure with ascites complication.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31792332 PMCID: PMC6888815 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54691-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1EGCG dosage schedule for preparing subacute liver failure with ascites complication. Mice were i.p. injected with saline (n = 6) as control or EGCG (n = 9) as indicated in a. (a) Body weight. (b) Mortality, incidence of ascites and weight of ascites. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM in a.
Figure 2Histopathological observation and fibrosis-associated protein expression. Mice were treated according to the method shown in Fig. 1a. (a) H&E staining. (b) Masson staining. (c) Fibrosis-associated proteins. Full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Figure 1. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM in c.
Figure 3Influence of EGCG on serum biomarkers. Mice were treated according to the method shown in Fig. 1a. (a) ALT. (b) AST. (c) TBIL. (d) DBIL. (e) ALB. (f) Ammonia. (g) BUN. (h) Cr. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 6 and 8 in control and EGCG group, respectively). ***P < 0.001, as compared to the control.
Hepatic cytokine levelsa.
| Control | EGCG | |
|---|---|---|
| IL-1β (pg/mg pro.) | 868.0 ± 91.6 | 752.9 ± 46.5 |
| IL-2 (pg/mg pro.) | 38.4 ± 4.0 | 33.2 ± 3.5 |
| IL-6 (ng/ mg pro.) | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.2 ± 0.3 |
| IL-10 (ng/mg pro.) | 19.1 ± 1.8 | 16.0 ± 1.5 |
| TNF-α (ng/mg pro.) | 10.3 ± 1.6 | 8.3 ± 0.7 |
| INF-γ (ng/mg pro.) | 37.4 ± 4.4 | 36.3 ± 3.1 |
aHepatic cytokine levels were measured using ELISA kits (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) according to manufacture’s instructions.
Figure 4Influence of EGCG on hepatic apoptosis-associated proteins and activities of hepatic TrxR, GR and Grx. Mice were treated according to the method shown in Fig. 1a. (a) Hepatic apoptosis-associated proteins. (b) Hepatic TrxR, GR and Grx activities. Full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Fig. 2. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 6 and 8 in control and EGCG group, respectively). **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001, as compared to the control.
Figure 5Influence of EGCG on renal UT-A1 and hepatic AQP2. Mice were treated according to the method shown in Fig. 1a. (a) Renal UT-A1. (b) Renal membrane UT-A1. (c) Hepatic AQP2. (d) Liver image. (e) Liver-to-body weight ratio. (f) Hepatic PCNA. All full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Fig. 3. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 6 in control group and n = 7 or 8 in EGCG group). **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001, as compared to the control.