| Literature DB >> 31792298 |
Huan Zhou1, Jun Dong2, Liyi Guo3, Xicheng Wang1, Kailin Wang1, Xiuyu Cai4, Shu Yang5.
Abstract
B7-H6, a member of the B7 family molecules, participates in the clearance of tumor cells by binding to NKp30 on NK cells. B7-H6 expression level in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and the clinical value remain unknown. The goal of this study was to determine the expression of B7-H6 in ESCC and further explore its clinical significance. We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 145 patients diagnosed with ESCC between January 2007 and December 2008. The expression of B7-H6 of the pathological tissue samples was detected by immunohistochemistry. The chi-square (χ2) test was used to analyse the relationships of B7-H6 and clinicopathological characteristics. Survival and hazard functions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival between groups was compared using the two-sided log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to adjust for the risk factors related to overall survival (OS). 133/145 (91.72%) of the ESCC tissue samples exhibited B7-H6 expression. The expression level of B7-H6 was correlated with T stage (P = 0.036) and lymphatic metastasis status (P = 0.044). High B7-H6 expression (P = 0.003) was associated with a significantly worse OS than low B7-H6 expression. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that tumour size (P = 0.021), B7-H6 expression (P = 0.025) and lymphatic metastasis status (P = 0.049) were independent prognostic factors of OS for ESCC. Collectively, our findings suggest that B7-H6 is widely expressed in ESCC samples. And B7-H6 may represent a predictor of poor prognosis for ESCC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31792298 PMCID: PMC6889130 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54731-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical characteristics of 145 patients.
| Characteristic | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Age(Years) | |
| Median | 60 |
| Range | 34–88 |
| <60 | 71(49.0) |
| ≥60 | 74(51.0) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 107(73.8) |
| Female | 38(26.2) |
| Tumour size (cm) | |
| <3.0 | 69(47.6) |
| ≥3.0 | 75(51.7) |
| Tumour location | |
| Upper third | 14(9.7) |
| Middle third | 90(62.1) |
| Lower third | 41(28.3) |
| Differentiation grade | |
| Low | 29(20.0) |
| Middle | 60(41.4) |
| High | 32(22.1) |
| Low-middle | 13(9.0) |
| Middle-high | 11(7.6) |
| T stage | |
| T1 | 13(9.0) |
| T2 | 23(15.9) |
| T3 | 96(66.2) |
| T4 | 13(9.0) |
| Lymphatic metastasis | |
| Yes | 64(44.1) |
| No | 81(55.9) |
| TNM stages | |
| I + II | 82(56.6) |
| III + IV | 63(43.4) |
| Death | |
| Yes | 79(54.5) |
| No | 66(45.5) |
Figure 1Immunohistochemical staining (magnification: left, 5×; right, 100×). Results: B7-H6 expression (brown) in ESCC tissue samples and adjacent normal tissue samples. Negative B7-H6 expression (A); Low B7-H6 expression (B); High B7-H6 expression in ESCC tissue samples(C). Low B7-H6 expression in adjacent normal tissue samples(D).
The clinical significance of B7-H6 expression.
| Clinical parameters | Cases | B7-H6 expression level | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H-score < 40 | H-score ≥ 40 | χ2 | |||
| Gender | 0.096 | 0.756 | |||
| Male | 107 | 51 | 56 | ||
| Female | 38 | 17 | 21 | ||
| Age (Years) | 0.055 | 0.815 | |||
| <60 | 71 | 34 | 37 | ||
| ≥60 | 74 | 34 | 40 | ||
| Tumour size,cm | 0.652 | 0.419 | |||
| <3.0 | 69 | 35 | 34 | ||
| ≥3.0 | 75 | 33 | 42 | ||
| Tumour location | 0.66 | 0.719 | |||
| Upper third | 14 | 8 | 6 | ||
| Middle third | 90 | 41 | 49 | ||
| Lower third | 41 | 19 | 22 | ||
| Differentiation grade | 1.389 | 0.846 | |||
| Low | 29 | 14 | 15 | ||
| Middle | 60 | 30 | 30 | ||
| High | 32 | 13 | 19 | ||
| Low-middle | 13 | 5 | 8 | ||
| Middle-high | 11 | 6 | 5 | ||
| T stage | 8.526 | 0.036a | |||
| T1 | 13 | 11 | 2 | ||
| T2 | 23 | 9 | 14 | ||
| T3 | 96 | 43 | 53 | ||
| T4 | 13 | 5 | 8 | ||
| Lymphatic metastasis | 4.062 | 0.044a | |||
| Yes | 64 | 24 | 40 | ||
| No | 81 | 44 | 37 | ||
| TNM stages | 0.73 | 0.393 | |||
| I + II | 82 | 41 | 41 | ||
| III + IV | 63 | 27 | 36 | ||
| Local recurrence or metastasis | 2.794 | 0.095 | |||
| Yes | 30 | 10 | 20 | ||
| No | 115 | 58 | 57 | ||
Note: aP < 0.05.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the associations between overall survival and tumour size (A, P = 0.001), lymphatic metastasis status (B, P < 0.001) or B7-H6 expression (C, P = 0.003) in ESCC patients.
Cox regression model analysis of prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
| Univariable | Multivariable | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Age, years (<60 vs ≥60) | 1.043 (0.670–1.621) | 0.853 | ||
| Gender (male vs female) | 0.814 (0.503–1.315) | 0.400 | ||
Upper third vs Lower third Middle third vs Lower third | 1.192(0.528–2.693) 0.891(0.535–1.484) | 0.673 0.658 | ||
| Tumour size, cm (<3.0 vs ≥3.0) | 2.095(1.323–3.316) | 0.002a | 1.749(1.089–2.807) | 0.021a |
| T1 vs T4 | 0.161 (0.044–0.587) | 0.006a | 0.400(0.092–1.745) | 0.223 |
| T2 vs T4 | 0.400 (0.169–0.948) | 0.037a | 0.507(0.140–1.842) | 0.302 |
| T3 vs T4 | 0.567(0.288–1.118) | 0.101 | 0.580(0.258–1.305) | 0.188 |
| Lymphatic metastasis (yes vs no) | 2.914(1.856–4.577) | <0.001a | 2.157(1.002–4.644) | 0.049a |
| TNM stages (I-II vs III-IV) | 2.912 (1.849–4.586) | <0.001a | 1.186 (0.474–2.969) | 0.715 |
| B7-H6 expression level (low vs high) | 2.053(1.266–3.329) | 0.004a | 1.751(1.071–2.861) | 0.025a |
Note: aP < 0.05.
Abbreviations: HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval.