OBJECTIVE: This study assesses tobacco use norm misperceptions by distinguishing between perceived and actual peer norms for both tobacco use attitudes and behavior, and examines the association between perceived norms and personal use among U.S. students in Grades 6-12. METHOD: Anonymous self-report surveys were conducted with 28,070 students across 64 schools in 11 U.S. states between 1999 and 2017. RESULTS: Although 77% of students said tobacco use is never good, 64% of students thought that most students in their grade believed that use is acceptable. Similarly, although 79% of students reported never using tobacco, 85% of students perceived that most students in their grade typically use tobacco, with 66% thinking that peers use monthly or more often. Substantial norm misperception existed regardless of student and school factors, increasing by grade. Perceiving that most peers thought tobacco use is acceptable was highly predictive of personal attitude, and perceiving tobacco use as the norm among same-grade peers strongly predicted personal tobacco use, even after we adjusted for actual peer use prevalence and other factors. Males' perception of the male peer norm was a stronger predictor of personal use than was their perception of the female peer norm. Females' perceptions of sex-specific norms were associated with personal use, each at about the same magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: Norm misperceptions are pervasive across a diversity of students and schools, whereas perceptions of peer norms about tobacco use are highly associated with personal attitude and use. Results suggest that population-wide interventions correcting these misperceptions may help reduce tobacco use broadly among youth.
OBJECTIVE: This study assesses tobacco use norm misperceptions by distinguishing between perceived and actual peer norms for both tobacco use attitudes and behavior, and examines the association between perceived norms and personal use among U.S. students in Grades 6-12. METHOD: Anonymous self-report surveys were conducted with 28,070 students across 64 schools in 11 U.S. states between 1999 and 2017. RESULTS: Although 77% of students said tobacco use is never good, 64% of students thought that most students in their grade believed that use is acceptable. Similarly, although 79% of students reported never using tobacco, 85% of students perceived that most students in their grade typically use tobacco, with 66% thinking that peers use monthly or more often. Substantial norm misperception existed regardless of student and school factors, increasing by grade. Perceiving that most peers thought tobacco use is acceptable was highly predictive of personal attitude, and perceiving tobacco use as the norm among same-grade peers strongly predicted personal tobacco use, even after we adjusted for actual peer use prevalence and other factors. Males' perception of the male peer norm was a stronger predictor of personal use than was their perception of the female peer norm. Females' perceptions of sex-specific norms were associated with personal use, each at about the same magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: Norm misperceptions are pervasive across a diversity of students and schools, whereas perceptions of peer norms about tobacco use are highly associated with personal attitude and use. Results suggest that population-wide interventions correcting these misperceptions may help reduce tobacco use broadly among youth.
Authors: Claudia R Pischke; Stefanie M Helmer; John McAlaney; Bridgette M Bewick; Bart Vriesacker; Guido Van Hal; Rafael T Mikolajczyk; Yildiz Akvardar; Francisco Guillen-Grima; Ferdinand Salonna; Olga Orosova; Solveig Dohrmann; Robert C Dempsey; Hajo Zeeb Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2015-07-23 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: H-U Wittchen; S Behrendt; M Höfler; A Perkonigg; R Lieb; G Bühringer; K Beesdo Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Clayton Neighbors; Melissa A Lewis; Joseph LaBrie; Angelo M DiBello; Chelsie M Young; Dipali V Rinker; Dana Litt; Lindsey M Rodriguez; C Raymond Knee; Ezekiel Hamor; Jessica M Jerabeck; Mary E Larimer Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2016-01-04
Authors: Christopher L Edwards; Gary G Bennett; Kathleen Y Wolin; Stephanie Johnson; Sherrye Fowler; Keith E Whitfield; Sandy Askew; Dorene MacKinnon; Camela McDougald; Robert Hubbard; Chanté Wellington; Miriam Feliu; Elwood Robinson Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Jessica M Perkins; Bernard Kakuhikire; Charles Baguma; Justin D Rasmussen; Emily N Satinsky; Allen Kiconco; Justus Kananura; Carolyn M Audet; Mark J Siedner; Jessica E Haberer; David R Bangsberg; Alexander C Tsai Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2022-01-16
Authors: Jessica M Perkins; Bernard Kakuhikire; Charles Baguma; Claire Q Evans; Justin D Rasmussen; Emily N Satinsky; Viola Kyokunda; Mercy Juliet; Immaculate Ninsiima; David R Bangsberg; Alexander C Tsai Journal: Tob Control Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 6.953
Authors: Jessica M Perkins; Bernard Kakuhikire; Charles Baguma; Meredith Meadows; Claire Q Evans; Jordan Jurinsky; Justin D Rasmussen; Emily N Satinsky; Patience Ayebare; Viola Kyokunda; Mercy Juliet; David R Bangsberg; Alexander C Tsai Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2021-12-07
Authors: Baojiang Chen; Kymberle L Sterling; Meagan A Bluestein; Arnold E Kuk; Melissa B Harrell; Cheryl L Perry; Adriana Pérez Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexander C Tsai; Bernard Kakuhikire; Jessica M Perkins; Jordan M Downey; Charles Baguma; Emily N Satinsky; Patrick Gumisiriza; Justus Kananura; David R Bangsberg Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 4.413
Authors: Delvon T Mattingly; Jayesh Rai; Osayande Agbonlahor; Kandi L Walker; Joy L Hart Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 3.390